Feedback to CVs thread- Story distortion#1 - Page 110

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ

Logical as ⭐️BHARAT: the Pandavas were not dumb enough to spend a year in a house of lac, etc... Certainly not the astute Arjuna and the Bukhaad Bheem who located the kitchen with his nose. Besides like the architect the writers had no solution for Aamavas... so ek sal had to become kuch din. Now stop questioning the CVs logic!😡🤣

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

😭 am not questioning CVs logic.. My question is from where these were interpreted? how 1 year can become 2-3 days? zero casualties in the whole incident is interpreted from where?

Confused Balika - have you not heard about "Apad Dharma"... must I explain it to you again? Apply it to the process of interpretation keeping in mind its more dramatic if the Panadavas dig themselves and TRP's depend on Arjuna doing heroic acts like leaping over fire. And you will know how 1 yr becomes 2-3 days😆 ⭐️Bharat CVs r ISHMART and practice what they preach...i mean show😡🤣

No why zero casaulties? Because missing minions would have caused suspicion... beside Dharmaraj surely knew it is not right to kill/punish citizens without trial😛😆 What am applying 21st century logic to dwapar yug like ⭐️BHARAT CVs😆

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

😭 am not questioning CVs logic.. My question is from where these were interpreted? how 1 year can become 2-3 days? zero casualties in the whole incident is interpreted from where?

No no please spare me from Apad Dharma.. Am ok with this Apad Drama 🤣

SPatel and Anjana.. just tell me one thing I will not trouble you two with my boring question again.. I dont think this can be called interpretation.. Fictionalisation is the closest word I can think of.. you 2 agree or disagree 😔

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

No no please spare me from Apad Dharma.. Am ok with this Apad Drama 🤣

I will, but will the CVs spare us from it this week? Bheesma n King Dhrit may get a lesson in it from Pandavas n their Princess Panchali.
,
==
All jokes apart - I think they are taking "creative liberties" with Mahabharat ka epic...but, that is not necessarily bad/good.

Originally posted by: spatel23

Agree fully, but to play devil's advocate (since that itself is extremely fun) ...

Interpretation is the action of explaining the meaning of something. Now, we all agree that this serial is labeled under Mythological Drama, hence religion cannot be stated as a factor (mythology vs. religion -- two totally different things; mythology can be part of a religion, but religion isn't a part of mythology).

The actions are all there in the text and I will, in the course of this hearing, use your examples against you 😛

Let's start with the arjun and subhadra meeting before the swayamvar. Ship!! Subhadra is a child ... okay, good argument. (apparently Arjun was 50 when he married Subhadra and 33 when he married Draupadi... source: http://www.drpvvartak.com/publishings/Birthdate_of_Krishna.pdf))🤣 But to uphold to honor of my client, spatel23, I shall show you that Subhadra was far from a child.

Subhadra was not born when Arjun was in Hastinapura, after completing his gurukul. So it must be logical to say that Subhadra used to visit Arjun in the form of a spirit (not like a ghost or anything, but you know how gods and goddess appear but don't appear... something like that). Either that, OR the subhadra who we see here is NOT the subhadra who married Arjun.

...

...

...

I give up. I quit. You win, spatel23 loses. Your Honor, I surrender my case and plead my client is insane and was not in a stable state of mind when he made this argument 🤣

(DISCLAIMER: HUMOR PURPOSES.. )

... seriously, I highly would expect that Arjun's age when he married Subhadra, as well as Subhadra's age when she married Arjun probably came up during the "research phase," which implies and supports Sabhayata fully...

My original intention was to say that interpretation can be taken in many ways. For example, with the Pandavas punching a hole. In the original, there was probably something about a miner. Now what SP did was they interpreted (see what I did there 😉) the miner as not an actual character, and they interpreted the hole that was dug, as not actually being there... with all these interpretations, they simply added one of their own - a super panch pandavas packed punch

Ok - I have 2 ask... what were these people consuming such that they could be so "active" in their old age? Did people back then really have such long life spans?

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ

Ok - I have 2 ask... what were these people consuming such that they could be so "active" in their old age? Did people back then really have such long life spans?

Originally posted by: medha00

The "Balya" stage ended after 40 years.

People were considered young adults till 120 years ... after that, it was middle age.

Source -MB Chrono., Hindu net 😆

So bheeshma was a young man when he died? Good GOD please tell me their diet😆