Madhu ne kaisa socha that RK is going to hurt mallik

sree.gattu thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#1

Madhu to RK ' mujhe tumhari saari sharatein manzoor hai . mein tumse shaadi karne ke liye tayyar hun . mallik ki operation ke liye paise de do . tum jo kahogi mein woh karoongi , bas '.

RK se accident hua mukku ka . Madhu filed case on RK . Madhu went to RK set gave lecture and got BBBed by RK . RK went to jail for 4nights and 4 days . RK played God Madhu . RK engagement karwane ke natak karke jhoota sagai toot gayi because of photos of Rishbala and Madhu been laila of RK . agar RK chahtha he would have done anything to mallik's family RK called Madhu to end .shamsher entered and got beaten by RK's security guards and bittuji . Madhu slapped RK 4 times infront of whole set .RK gave a deal to Madhu . Madhu ready to be Madhubala Rishabh Kundra and RK giving 40lakhs for mallik's medication .

RK never made bittuji interfere in between RK and Madhu . only RK tackled as kahin na kahin Madhu is RK's love . kya hota mallik family ka aur Madhu agar RK bittuji ko chuut de detha . RK did all kameenapan in his classy way as our RK's other name is Right kameena .

coming to RK , Madhu just said ready to marry and listen to him , RK apna waada nibhathe hue operation ke liye paise diya aur poora illazmallik ke liye paise dene ke liye ready hogaya . Madhu operation mallik ka start hua aur Madhu RK se kiya hua waada thodna shuru kiya . Madhu shaadi ki place par ayi poori tayyar ho kar because of dress designer who is been wither . RK khud Madhu ko shaadi karne ke jagah par laya . abtak it's ok . mana for Madhu yeh shaadi majboori ka hai but not zabardarsti ka . Madhu didn't sit till RK made her to . Madhu didn't do pooja and stood for phere's . Madhu behaved as if RK kidnapped aur zabardasti se shaadi kar raha hai .

Madhu ka gripravesh ke waqt , Madhu ki aarti coal se kiya tha . Madhu ko tikka lagane ke liye pehle RK ne apni ungli jalayi tab Madhu ko kala theeka lagaya . saare servants ke samne Madhu ko insult kiya yeh kehkar she is 9th servant and at the same time he tells all servants to say Namaste to Madhu and leave . so much respect to a servant , kaun kartha hain . special room to her and her surname is Mrs Madhubala Rishabh Kundra .

RK forcely Madhu ko bangles pehnatha hai which were given by Madhu . Rishbala ki first Suhaag raat , bed decorated with cactus and dry red chilli . RK Madhu ki zindagi mein theekapan lane ke liye woh khud mirchi khatha . when Madhu went to hospital to see mallik without RK's consent , RK brings Madhu home and gets name janwar and gave lecture . RK broke the bottles on ground and warned next time he is going break bottle on Madhu's head if again she lecture lifts bottle top and later breaks down . RK insults padmini on set , Madhu challenges that within 24 hrs she make RK say sorry . Madhu got photos from Bhatia gang and RK got blacked by Madhu . RK broke down but didn't harm Madhu but said sorry to padmini . again RK saw his photos got published in newspaper again RK breakdown but didn't hurt Madhu physically .

it's true RK is short tempered and gets angry so soon . RK very angry on Madhu wanted. to hurt Madhu as she hurted RK [ as according to RK , Madhu blackmailed that she is going to publish ] . RK went to hospital to say truth of Rishbala's relation . RK took knife and Madhu thought RK is going to hurt mallik . Madhu ki chehre par dar as if RK is going to hurt mallik with knife .how can she think , is RK khooni ya goonda to hurt or kill people .

so , strange itna waqt rehne ke baad bhi RK ke saath , she didn't understand RK . later jo insaan apni bache ko haath pairon ko bandkar use kiya as pawn . another day he kidnapped Madhu as his son wants her to take medicines from her and understood , sultan is very good person and good father who loves his son . hume bagut confuse kiya .

Edited by sree.gattu - 10 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

5

Views

946

Users

4

Likes

14

Frequent Posters

RIMO9013 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
dont get so confused dear kuch log hote hi aise ki apni sabse karibi insan ko chod ke dunia bhar ki paraya logon ko achchadekhna pasand karte hay madhu kuch aise hi hay nehi to socho usse ekbaar soach na chahie tha ki uss cheeze ki kia keemat ho sakta hay jis ke lie rk jaisa swabhimani igoistic insan jhukne ke lie majboor ho sakta hai wo ek baar bhi nehi socha ki wo tasveer kisne dia aur kyon rk me lakh budai sahi par wo khud ke siba kisike samne vi madhu ko jhukne nehi dia apne ma baap ke saamne vi nehi ussne jo bhi kia jaise vi wo un dono ke beech ki baat thi par madhu ne sabke samne rk ko jhukne par majboor kia to wo kaise na sochegi ki rk will hurt malik ussme rk jaisa complecated insaanko samajh ne ki akkal hi nehi hai isilie ussne rk ki hath knife dekhi aur soach lia ki he is gonna hurt malik hamesha zid ya iradon ki pakka hone se hi kam nehi chalta kuch brain ki vi jarurat hoti hai
ps no bashing completely my pov
bokul thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Master Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#3
this mentality of madhu was so confusing and offensive
she never felt bad for rk but she always felt bad for a gangster
sree.gattu thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: RIMO9013

dont get so confused dear kuch log hote hi aise ki apni sabse karibi insan ko chod ke dunia bhar ki paraya logon ko achchadekhna pasand karte hay madhu kuch aise hi hay nehi to socho usse ekbaar soach na chahie tha ki uss cheeze ki kia keemat ho sakta hay jis ke lie rk jaisa swabhimani igoistic insan jhukne ke lie majboor ho sakta hai wo ek baar bhi nehi socha ki wo tasveer kisne dia aur kyon rk me lakh budai sahi par wo khud ke siba kisike samne vi madhu ko jhukne nehi dia apne ma baap ke saamne vi nehi ussne jo bhi kia jaise vi wo un dono ke beech ki baat thi par madhu ne sabke samne rk ko jhukne par majboor kia to wo kaise na sochegi ki rk will hurt malik ussme rk jaisa complecated insaanko samajh ne ki akkal hi nehi hai isilie ussne rk ki hath knife dekhi aur soach lia ki he is gonna hurt malik hamesha zid ya iradon ki pakka hone se hi kam nehi chalta kuch brain ki vi jarurat hoti hai

ps no bashing completely my pov

that's true .
it's not bashing Madhu or anyone . it's just analysis which kahin na kahin cv's failed to show what they started and how they progressing scenes . sorry for hurting anyone .
leelaa9 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#5
Excellent post, Sree. :)

I always found RK and Madhu to be equally fiercely egoistic and obdurate, but on different points.😳 The main difference was that RK considered himself egoistic and obdurate, and the extent of Madhu's egotism and obduracy were never openly admitted to by anyone except as a supposedly wrong claim.
Madhu was naively idealistic. And though Shamsher and Padmini knew that the world could be nasty, they both went along with the flow of Madhu's righteous crusades, supporting her most unwise actions - and then being as shocked and upset as her at the reactions and consequences not being pleasant for her/them.
It was an unbelievably childish belief that she could attack someone and win and gloat hugely, and that person would not retaliate. If there was retaliation, then Madhu-Padmini-Shamsher would all react as if they were being tortured by someone they had done nothing to provoke terribly.

It was actually very interesting writing, precisely because Madhu's considering right and wrong only as per her like or dislike for a person was properly embodied in her prioritizing RK after she grew to love him.

The writing started to slide when the CVs decided to do the unwedding, for which they needed to make freshly shot flashback explanations. It was similar to any wretchedly written Hindi detective film, where the ending usually has a bizarre conclusion with 'explanation' of scenes/clues that were not there in the actual film until that point.
But even after the imprudent 'unwedding' point, the CVs still managed to keep the leads characterizations reasonable for a few weeks.
But when they decided to forcefeed a new male lead to the audience, and tried to villainize RK, they blundered hugely to Madhu's and Padmini's detriment.
They seemed to assume that Madhu and Padmini liking or disliking a character would make that character more or less popular with the crucial majority-audience whose preferences can terminate characters and/or tracks in a serial.
It was a faulty assumption since RK's popularity had consolidated just fine even while Madhu and Padmini had detested him for a considerable duration at the start of his role.

But the CVs insistently for months showed Madhu (completely uncharacteristically) and Padmini supporting the other guy as better than RK, backfiringly ensuring that RK's mass-popularity with majority-audience increased at Madhu's expense, and Padmini became an easily dispensable and vanishable supporting character.

If a lead pairing in a series is hugely more popular than any supporting character in the series, then any supporting character trying to separate that pairing has to accept the error of opposing it and become very apologetically supportive, or the role ends up drastically curbed.
A positive supporting character crusading for something against majority-audience's preferences can either become vamp/villain or disappear mostly or totally from the story.

I don't regret Padmini and later Roma disappearing, after their being used as ploys in two separate situations for Rishbala's estrangement backfired, with the couple remaining and the female-lead's 'supportive' relative dispensable.
But it is bitter that the CVs, willfully and repeatedly misunderstanding the massive millions of mostly conservative majority-audience's sensibilities so crucial to a track/serial's continuing, placed Madhu - both senior and junior - in tracks guaranteed to gain her mass-disapprobation, with the mass-audience's condoning support foreseeably switched to the male lead, instead of for both in the lead-pairing as they did when Madhu's characterization was mass-appreciable.
And a track showcasing what the majority-audience does not want to see can insistently start but must necessarily close, with the prospect of pinching losses for going against the huge primetime India viewership which can switch channels when they don't like what they see in a series.
Edited by leelaa9 - 10 years ago
sree.gattu thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: leelaa9

Excellent post, Sree. :)

I always found RK and Madhu to be equally fiercely egoistic and obdurate, but on different points.😳 The main difference was that RK considered himself egoistic and obdurate, and the extent of Madhu's egotism and obduracy were never openly admitted to by anyone except as a supposedly wrong claim.
Madhu was naively idealistic. And though Shamsher and Padmini knew that the world could be nasty, they both went along with the flow of Madhu's righteous crusades, supporting her most unwise actions - and then being as shocked and upset as her at the reactions and consequences not being pleasant for her/them.
It was an unbelievably childish belief that she could attack someone and win and gloat hugely, and that person would not retaliate. If there was retaliation, then Madhu-Padmini-Shamsher would all react as if they were being tortured by someone they had done nothing to provoke terribly.

It was actually very interesting writing, precisely because Madhu's considering right and wrong only as per her like or dislike for a person was properly embodied in her prioritizing RK after she grew to love him.

The writing started to slide when the CVs decided to do the unwedding, for which they needed to make freshly shot flashback explanations. It was similar to any wretchedly written Hindi detective film, where the ending usually has a bizarre conclusion with 'explanation' of scenes/clues that were not there in the actual film until that point.
But even after the imprudent 'unwedding' point, the CVs still managed to keep the leads characterizations reasonable for a few weeks.
But when they decided to forcefeed a new male lead to the audience, and tried to villainize RK, they blundered hugely to Madhu's and Padmini's detriment.
They seemed to assume that Madhu and Padmini liking or disliking a character would make that character more or less popular with the crucial majority-audience whose preferences can terminate characters and/or tracks in a serial.
It was a faulty assumption since RK's popularity had consolidated just fine even while Madhu and Padmini had detested him for a considerable duration at the start of his role.

But the CVs insistently for months showed Madhu (completely uncharacteristically) and Padmini supporting the other guy as better than RK, backfiringly ensuring that RK's mass-popularity with majority-audience increased at Madhu's expense, and Padmini became an easily dispensable and vanishable supporting character.

If a lead pairing in a series is hugely more popular than any supporting character in the series, then any supporting character trying to separate that pairing has to accept the error of opposing it and become very apologetically supportive, or the role ends up drastically curbed.
A positive supporting character crusading for something against majority-audience's preferences can either become vamp/villain or disappear mostly or totally from the story.

I don't regret Padmini and later Roma disappearing, after their being used as ploys in two separate situations for Rishbala's estrangement backfired, with the couple remaining and the female-lead's 'supportive' relative dispensable.
But it is bitter that the CVs, willfully and repeatedly misunderstanding the massive millions of mostly conservative majority-audience's sensibilities so crucial to a track/serial's continuing, placed Madhu - both senior and junior - in tracks guaranteed to gain her mass-disapprobation, with the mass-audience's condoning support foreseeably switched to the male lead, instead of for both in the lead-pairing as they did when Madhu's characterization was mass-appreciable.
And a track showcasing what the majority-audience does not want to see can insistently start but must necessarily close, with the prospect of pinching losses for going against the huge primetime India viewership which can switch channels when they don't like what they see in a series.

beautiful explanation loved it . leela I love your explanations a lot . I hated when roma entered in Madhu's heroine track . I hated roma , how easily she forget trishna . roma is the person who entered heroine ka bhoot into trishna's bhoot . Ione time she didn't talked about trishna . roma after Madhu and created problems . padmini talking about vishwaas on RK is like joke to me as she had trust on only sultan . nice that both padmini and roma vanished and padmini again appeared in KRK's track .

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".