Posted:
I am trying to understand what the CV's have in mind...
First the Blue Gown and Now the Black Gown...the only major difference between the gown other than the color is that the the Blue one was Halter Neck, and the Black one is an off shoulder with a one sided sliver-black strap...The Skin Show in both the Gowns is to the same extent.
You guys maybe wondering where I am headed to with this Post...Well here it is we all saw how Uncomfy Madhu was in the Blue Gown with the Stole etc While the Backlessness was something she could cover with her hair, the makers chose to not opt that route use a stole and then make a scene out of it...Today Madhu once again is in an almost similar attire and looks damn comfortable in it too...
My question is why make RK looks like some guy who had no regard for woman, her Izzat an stuff at that point of time??? First of all there is nothing Vulgar about these dresses, the only point has to be the comfort quotient, back then she used a stole, today she looks damn comfortable...Toh uss din hungama karne ki kya zaroorat thi?????
Something i didn't quite understand. Cinematic Liberty apni jagah, Logic aur relaistic touch apni jagah...Well maybe when RK gifts her this gown she may show hesitation, but from what was shown in E24 what i gauged is that us din baat ko kuch zyada keencha tha...Just my POV.
Did the Cv's forget what they showed? Were they plain confused? or Is this what one calls heights of Hypocrisy?
PS: I LOVE DD, She looks gorgeous in every single attire she's adorned on screen...The post is about MADHU the character, and what CV's have tried to portray at 2 different instances.
