Originally posted by: FingerFetish
*Bangs head against the wall*. Can you please re-read my message and interpret it correctly? I felt like I said A B C D and you retaliated with Uno Dos Tres. Her bottom was an example! Gosh why do I even bother? You are going to sit there and justify Madhu being rightfully slapped back and that is just sickening. I feel like I have entered the Pratigya forums. Hero's physical and mental abuse was tolerated and encouraged because fanatics found it hot. I suppose that is the justification for your opinion. Oh my he roughly grabbed her arms despite her saying no - how hot hot hot!
This is a public forum. Don't expect that everyone is going to have the same tone or form of expressing their views like you. I was initially enraged at RK's justification. Now I'm simply sickened by the opinions presented. To think that a woman should be slapped back because she fought and struggled against her tormentor is possibly the reason why domestic violence still continues to occur.
Oh please don't give the 'man and wife' examples. That is a poor attempt to justify everything. In fact it just makes the relationship of a husband and wife look disgusting. Be it husband or wife, if the other spouse does not want to be touched, he or she still has no right to do so. Do I have to spell it out for you to understand? S H E D I D N O T W A N T TO BE T O U C H E D. What did he do? Like a raving puppy continued to G R A B O N T O H E R. He could be her husband, father or son. When someone says no, than take it as that. Whatever she did was her business. If she wanted to be humiliated by going to the set than so be it. That does not mean she was asking to be touched. Lord I feel like I'm speaking in jibberish!
RK didn't want to harm her? 🤣🤣🤣 I assume mental and emotional abuse counts to nothing right? It just has to be physical.
Go on the address bar and type up 'www.google.com'. Than search the term 'abuse'. You will find emotional and mental abuse being a part of it. If RK didn't want to harm her physically, he already done the deed by hurling mental and emotional abuses.
I feel like we are riding on a merry go round. So according to you it's not a major hype that it was just her back being exposed? It's not about us complaining. It is about the character - C H A R A C T E R of Madhu being uncomfortable to expose her body to a bunch of randoms. I see the issue here. The audience drools over Drashti's back. Drashti is an actress, Madhubala is the character. Please learn to differentiate between the two. How on earth does the audience liking DD's back got anything to do with Madhubala the character feeling violated for having revealed certain parts of her body that she does not feel comfortable exposing. I literally hope you read this paragraph and understand that your message just did not make sense whatsoever. 👏👏👏
It's not like RK would be like to Madhubala 'Hush don't worry, the DDians all love your back anyway'. Madhubala will look at RK and say 'Who the hell is DD?'. See the difference between real and reel?