what i understood from his reply is that if he would have not given those"pathetic " dialogues,it would not have done justice to his revenge mode..he is taking revenge so why should his dialogues have any boundaries..they should be out and out blunt so it hurts bad..because that is why he has done this drama..to hurt Madhu..to take revenge and break her.. also he said that if RK would not have been so rude/harsh/evil yesterday than Padmini's strong dialogues would look out of place and not touched us so much because obviously he wants the audience to connect..if we are not outraged at RK's dialogues we would also not feel strongly about Padmini's words and behavior..LIKE we were so angry on RK after his dialogues that we wanted to give him many baduas to him ourselves,,
well thats my interpretation of what he said..could be wrong..but I think RK did all this to take revenge only..but now he will realize that in his method of taking revenge he actually came close to Madhu..he thinks he was acting all along but I am sure he does not realize till now that he started slowly living the character he was pretending!..and bam that is what will hit him bad..!!..now no matter what RK cannot undo what he did to Madhu when she blindly trusted him..now he will deny that he has feelings for her but than when he lately accepts also it wont be a smooth ride..that is why MADHUBALA is a dark love story!..hate you and love you at the same time!!
i agree with ur explanation thats make some sense arnav dont mind but urs bit confusing