my take on RKs religiousness or lack of it

i somehow identify RK with myself on this one.

i was and am a born hindu. i loved my faith as a child and i still do.

i love and respect all gods of hindus and all others.

but here comes a contradiction, even though i respect them, i dont have much faith in their powers.

i have carefully observed in my surroundings , belief in god is not a cover of immunity to anything.

otherwise why people die in bomb blasts in temples?

if god s there why cant he protect his devotees?

why cant the god protect itself from being demolished?

i observe all fasts on hindus and wish well for my family, becuase that belief has been wired into me.

but i see no major difference in the life expectency of hindus and others who dont observe such rituals.

i dont see ANY tangible evidence of god's presence except few miracles we tend to find after a lot of wait lie a baby beign born with a quran in hand or idols suddenly drinking milk!

in the position i am in, that of skepticism , i find the efforts of madhu very childish and misguided.

i for one am willing to believe in god IF i get some conclusive evidence. what madhu is doing is definitely not somethign which would ever convince me to believe again.

i dont think th ekind fo evidences i want , would come by in my life time. i love hinduism and i love all its fables,dieties and mythologies. but while i regard them with love and respect, god itself is a matter of great mystery to me. im a disbeliever afte careful observation. i dotn knwo where i stand.

i am a strict moralist but i am not a devout thiest.

if RK is an athiest i guess he has arrieved at that conclusion by himself. i think he should be left to figure out his belief on his own.

if he plans to believe again, it should be on his own experiences.