Originally posted by: whynot
Hi spian... you asked for this, ab bhugto 😆 😆
While i agree with you that there are many narratives that question army regulations (my fav film version is A Few Good Men while in lit it has to be Catch-22), i do not think this is happening in Left Right Left... in many ways what is happening in Left Right Left is more adolescent.... friendship, love, identity, discovering your own identity, jealousy etc. I'm not saying that these narratives are less real or less painful but i do not think that the story is questioning the army the way Arms and the Man and Catch-22 did.
Hey Shevs I havent said that LRL does that. I know Arms & the Man and Catch 22 are great works by the authors. what I implied was there are limitations by virtue of systems/procedures in Army and sometimes these are illogical.
2ndly, sweetheart, in my post i did not make any claims for the 'real Gaurav'... when i said real life, i meant me and people like me.... and yes i keep forgetting that i should not take everything back to Samay! 😊
Tum shabdo ke maayajaal mein phaas rahi ho!😆
To come back to the two texts you mention, even their criticism of the army has more layers to it.
Arms and the Man/Bluntshcli: Shaw knew the pulse of his audience well and was at the same time engaged with social issues.... thus while criticising the army, Arms and the man is also a popular comedy of its time.... what i mean is it is as much a romantic comedy as a criticism of war. Bluntschli is not ideologically anti-war, he is not even an anti-hero, he is the hero.... he may be comic.... he may mock conventional notions of courage and carry choclate in his pockets instead of ammunition, but the focus of the play is on him from scene one.... the audience, like the heroine (i've forgotten her name, Romana was it?), discovers Bluntschli through the course of the play and respond to him... he is the one whose lines they laugh at, he is the one they want the heroine with, he is the one they learn to laugh at the war with, though neither he nor they can escape the war.. whereas Abhimanyu is ideologically anti-violence.... and now he is questioning everything his life has been so far and turning his back on it.... which i think makes him different from Bluntschli.
well Bluntschli does believe in avoiding wars and conflict - he runs away from war to survive and doesnt contest Raina's beliefs/opinions but defends his. He believes in being alive and practical aspect. I wish instead of showing an absurd charac the Lrl makers can model Abhi's charac on Bluntschli😳 ....I for one would love that.
Catch-22: I still have to make up my mind whether to forgive you or not for comparing this classic to Left Right Left. 😉 😆.... Catch-22 is written in the Absurd tradition.... its a crazy, mad book.... and it does not question only war or army regulations.... it also questions concepts like society, bravery, nationhood, sanity..... what is a nation?.... why does one kill others or kill oneself for the sake of it? what makes it ok, legal and even brave to go on killing people at one point of time in history because the government wants you to while the same thing done by a person not in uniform is homicide and punishable by law? what is sane? what is insane? if a soldier goes mad after killing so many people, who is responsible for that lapse of sanity?.... if someone fakes insanity to avoid killing people, is that ethically a better choice to make?.... what is war?... who takes the decision to fight it? and who are the people who live that decision out?.... who profits from it monetarily?.... what is the self and how much can a sensitive self take of the continuous horrors of war before it loses its sense of reality?
These are some of the questions that Catch-22 asks.... and it asks them crazily, using black humour, because that is the only way Yossarian can understand the world around him, make some sense of it....
Left Right Left.... even to mention it after such a text is sacrilege.... all i'll say is that it is not doing any of the above things.
Quoting "Catch-22 is a general critique of bureaucratic operation and reasoning.... "Catch-22" is a military rule, the self-contradictory circular logic of which, for example, prevents anyone from avoiding combat missions."
Why I mentioned was just becoz I was reminded Catch -22 from the absurd scenes shown😆 . Vaguely relating Doc Daneeka=Naveen 😆 and Milo Mindbender-Nair😆 and thoroughly enjoyed Ex-PFC Wintergreen. I wont relate others you can make your ownlist😆
But its nice to know that people still read books 😊
yes books are nice but I read these when once upon a time😆 I was in school so.....😉