Originally posted by: KavitaDR
I have been one of the staunchest believers right from the day Seema came back that she is dubious, not in the sense that she is out to do harm necessarily, but rather, that she set out on this journey seeking redemption and forgiveness with an ulterior motive which she finally admitted to Dutta today, that is to be given a place in the latter's life.
Indeed. She did. This is something that is clear from the very moment that she returns on the show. Despite her prayers and the support that she gives Naku, the presence of that ulterior motive was that of an elephant in a room. It couldn't be ignored. It is also what made me hesitate so much in trying in all honesty to feel some level of sympathy for her character. In the scene where Dutta finds out that she is, in fact, Seema - she jumped right into telling him her tragic story. It irked me, because here you're meeting the man whose life you ruined completely after ten years, and still you're focusing on your own pain and tragedy? I felt that she should've apologized for what she'd done instantaneously. That she should've focused solely on that rather than putting herself, her own "punishment/past" in focus.
There is nothing wrong in the pursuit of happiness as all human beings err and should be given a chance to reform. The only difference being that her pursuit of happiness should not have been limited to a selfish need where it is once again a question of ME, ME, ME all over again.
True. There's nothing wrong in the pursuit of happiness. Human beings do err and, yes, they should be given a chance to reform. But like you said, what motivates Seema is her own selfish needs. This is bound to break her at some point. If her intentions were as selfish as they seem, then upon losing the thing that she has struggled to gain (not that she ever had it in the first place), the possibility of her remaining positive is slim. Had it not been selfishness that drove her, then she might've been able to turn Dutta words around and be happy for him. The man whose life she destroyed has found happiness in its entirety. He had regained his humanity. Shouldn't that matter more to her than her own happiness, her own needs?
Seema's meeting with a grievously injured and unconscious Dutta was pure FATE but it was too late for her as she had succumbed her persona to a lifestyle which has over the years pervaded her understanding of reality and her own aspirations to the point that she cannot see beyond herself. Yet, another narcissistic character we could have done without. We kept shouting on the forum ever since she was crash-landed in LTL 5 weeks back as to the reasons why CVs needed to bring her back in Dutta's life.
I think that Seema is the typical femme fatale. She might've matured over the past ten years, but she's still - in a sense - where Dutta left her. Like you said, she has adopted a lifestyle that only calls for those characteristics in her that became her fall in the first place. Manipulating men with her beauty, seducing them for money, being bold and simply living a life that shouldn't be lived by any woman. The problem, I think, is that we don't get to see how much of it was her own choice and how much of it was the consequence of her actions (betraying Dutta).
We would have been more amenable and ready for some form of empathy towards her if she had taken steps to inform Dutta's family of his whereabouts straight away as she was not at that point aware of the dangers that Dutta faced and would have earned brownie points. And as soon as she was made aware of the tragic circumstances of Dutta's accident, she chose to latch on the opportunity to lay claim to a place in the latter's life. I would hate to be so uncharitable as to say that all that was mere calculations, but let it suffice that she did not come clear. She could sense Dutta's revulsion towards her; she could make out the presence of another person in Dutta's life through his phone calls and yet did not stop to think for even one second that she may be treading No-Man's land.
Indeed. In all this, it was obvious that Dutta didn't trust her completely. He told her what was necessary to tell her about his "special someone", but he made it very clear that he couldn't trust her entirely. I think that alone speaks for the possibility of her turning negative sometime in the future. Not alone didn't she regain the man that she once loved, she also hasn't regained his trust entirely.
Something that I cannot seem to believe is that she truly loves Dutta. I still believe that she is in love with the idea of him, of the love and adoration that he once showered her with. Having lived a life where men used her (and she used them in return), the idea of regaining the kind of love Dutta had for her becomes naturally desirable. Seema's character is the personification of some of the most raw human conditions or traits, I think. Greediness, selfishness, the desire to have back what was once hers...
In the end, if any of those traits are allowed to dominate, then she is surely to fall once again. I think that a woman like Seema is easily overpowered by such conditions.
And now time for the accolades....Brillant, brillant, brillant Mishal Raheja again👏👏👏. What more epithets to add to this actor's perfect timing and sensitivity for a character that he makes us pine for every hour of the day, seven days a week.
When does Mishal ever disappoint us? 😉 😃