Is this even possible...

Originally posted by: kaly07

Hi friends! I am so happy that today was Monday and it was sad to see Dutta like that...last in his own thoughts. 😭 But, my question is that is this even possible to break a relationship without any divorce? If Dutta wants to let her go and start a new life then shouldn't he be giving her a divorce? Would he give her or not? Guys, if this post is already posted then please close this topic.

I too was wondering about the same thing.

Originally posted by: bookworm2

I too was wondering about the same thing.

Yea, same here. It is not possible, right? If you want to break a relationship then the married couple get divorce and then move on to their individual lives.

😭I think Dattu is classing this marriage as VOID so i think no divorce in required....................

Originally posted by: Chaudhrytm

😭I think Dattu is classing this marriage as VOID so i think no divorce in required....................

Really.....that's weird though. I mean, everyone was there at their marriage day when Dutta married her by force. Everyone saw that. How can he declare invalid about their marry? I thought that he goes by rules.

Firstly the marrige was forced and they didnt consummate the marriage thus making it void😭

Actually Naku can claim her rights as Dutta's wife since there were many witnesses to their marriage. But Naku wont do it. Plus the idea of sending Naku to a new place is to ensure she can start life with a clean slate as Naku and her family can get lost in the anonymity a city provides. The arrangement wud be perfect for naku to erase any gossip abt her past. But Dutta continues to live in a small town among the same set of friends and family...so he cannot really erase his past. but since he's feared i am sure no one will question him.

Originally posted by: Chaudhrytm

Firstly the marrige was forced and they didnt consummate the marriage thus making it void😭

I agree that the marriage was forced nor consummate the marriage either, but it is still considered as marriage. Does it matter whether the marriage was consummate or not?

Originally posted by: kaly07

I agree that the marriage was forced nor consummate the marriage either, but it is still considered as marriage. Does it matter whether the marriage was consummate or not?

A marriage can be annulled on grounds of lack of consummation. but lets not forget naku has never refused to consummate. so again the weaker party here wud be dutta and not naku. 😉

No, it doesn't matter if the marriage was consummated or not. Here's the gray area. We have Dutta, who essentially lives under his own rules. The laws of society may not necessarily apply to him as with others. Yes, the marriage counts though. But as far as he is considered and his family, it was never VALID for a couple of reasons: it was forced upon Naku, Dutta did "not know" what he was doing, the pandit was forced with physical violence...it's not the stuff Hindu or any marriages are made of. But it counts, and I'm surprised he did not mention divorce per se...maybe it can be inferred, I don't know. I'm so confused on this one, personally. Marriage to me is as much based on intention as the act itself--both have to be there on both sides. Like if someone holds a gun to someone's head and forces them to do the pheras, is it a marriage? Or is it an act of violence? Dutta causes so much confusion...but he's worth it!