eKLAVYA-ANSH GOOD BLOOD BAD BLOOD?

poppyrs thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1

Ansh was bad because of his Parvarish but his blood is supposed to be good, (Its Tulsi's Blood) people say upbringing can have a strong effect on people so we understand why Ansh was a villain, Eklavya has Ansh blood, (which is Tulsis blood therefore a good blood line) his upbringing has been good so why would his characteristic become a bad/dark/viallainous I really dont understand, he has good blood in him as well as parvarish, it is just not logical for Nandani tanya to say he will become like his dad, Ansh. Eklavya did not spend time with Ansh to pick up on the characteristic so when they blame Eklavya thay are saying the badness is in the blood, hence Tulsi and Mihirs blood, please tell me where the logic is?????????? 😕

Created

Last reply

Replies

4

Views

888

Users

4

Frequent Posters

bhaveshavani thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#2

Originally posted by: poppyrs

Ansh was bad because of his Parvarish but his blood is supposed to be good, (Its Tulsi's Blood) people say upbringing can have a strong effect on people so we understand why Ansh was a villain, Eklavya has Ansh blood, (which is Tulsis blood therefore a good blood line) his upbringing has been good so why would his characteristic become a bad/dark/viallainous I really dont understand, he has good blood in him as well as parvarish, it is just not logical for Nandani tanya to say he will become like his dad, Ansh. Eklavya did not spend time with Ansh to pick up on the characteristic so when they blame Eklavya thay are saying the badness is in the blood, hence Tulsi and Mihirs blood, please tell me where the logic is?????????? 😕

exactly he was raised by mother like damini , and was in shantiniketan under baa's supervision,... he was introduced as very opposite character of ansh,,,,, so i think he is good.. i hope this trauma doesnt turn him evil.... plz ekta dont do that plz plz😭
poppyrs thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#3
but thats exactly my point, why should he turn evil if he has good blood and good parvarish. it would be stupid if the writers decide to do that 😆 As a character from a good family who had high morals always forgives and forgets does not turn evil
Edited by poppyrs - 18 years ago
Khushi11 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#4
I agree... its unfair of people to think 'like father like son'... does that mean all the criminals have their son as criminals too ... if that was the case the whole world wud be criminal ... no one should judge Eklavya without even knowing him... I do support KT pointing fingers at Eklavya cuz he was with her till she was unconsious and he was in the room with her and all and thats wat she can remember and anyone wud do that at in place...but Shaninaketan people should support Eklavya knowing how he has been all his life ...not cuz his father wat like that so he wud be the same... its very sad!!!....
Posted: 18 years ago
#5
tyeaah
i just thinkk it wouldnt be right if the writers decide to do tht

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".