What is this show proving?

i am finding it hard to believe that this show is showing/telling us that "nature" (biological parents) is more important than "nuture" (adoptive parents). bhumi who hated everyone in her family including eku has found it her stone of a heart to luv eku cuz their have the same father the same father who she did not respect bcuz she thought the father was her uncle .... anyone outside of her immediate family (karan, tanya, man) is not fit for her etc etc...now that she has found out about her ansh daddy she is hell bent on revenge n she doesn't even bloody know jack S***T..I AM SORRY but how can someone have a change of heart just like that??? y isn't she tryin to find out what happened instead of just thinkin o tulsi killed ma dad i am gonna get revenge by killin her...(i luved da scene where she gets slapped!!😃👏) n i wish karan would have slapped tanya 😡😡😡 n said some stuff bout what kinda upbringing did she give bhumi like o my god i don't care if my own child did what bhumi did i would not defend that devil of a child no matter how much i luv him/her...human life whether its someone i luv o don't even know is should not be taken...a human does not have the right to take another human's life just bcuz they hate that person...bhumi does not have dat rite....!!! now u might be saying tulsi killed ansh...well there are 2 expections i think or believe... in self defense/or protecting someone when that is da only option but killing someon outta anger/hate/revenge whateva is not acceptable...what fumes me is how can they show that tanya doesn't find any fault of bhumi but instead goes and consoles her 😡 i would not do that heck i think i would kick that sorry excuse of a child outta ma life throw em in prison n throw away the keys but thats just me ....I DONT KNOW y i keep watching these stupid tv serials...they make such far fetch stories it pisses me rite off like come on don't make stories that are like really hard to believe make something close to reality mayb then most of the viewers wont' complain as much ..wow what a rant eh?? lol ... so here is my question people..what is more important "nature" or "nuture"...ekta really should think bout the story lines twice maybe thrice but think bout it more than once cuz from what i am seein it seems like its like a half @$$ job of story writing throw anything n everything together n see what we get eh ...

this show along with kahani and kasauti tries to prove that if you are a good person and have a big heart , life is gonna screw you over.

Originally posted by: ladyvenom

i luved da scene where she gets slapped!!😃👏) n i wish karan would have slapped tanya 😡😡😡 n said some stuff bout what kinda upbringing did she give bhumi like o my god i don't care if my own child did what bhumi did i would not defend that devil of a child no matter how much i luv him/her...human life whether its someone i luv o don't even know is should not be taken...a human does not have the right to take another human's life just bcuz they hate that person...bhumi does not have dat rite....!!! now u might be saying tulsi killed ansh...well there are 2 expections i think or believe... in self defense/or protecting someone when that is da only option but killing someon outta anger/hate/revenge whateva is not acceptable...

I'm going to say this before people bash me left, right and center:

Slapping your son/daughter doesn't make one a better parent. If Karan was truly angry at Bhoomi, he should've done something other than slap her because slapping just makes the person more stubborn, things are usually left unclear because the person who's been slapped garners hatred towards the one who slapped him/her. If only Karan had told Bhoomi the truth about his father - that would've hit her harder than a slap and tighter than a belt. Abuse is not the way to express anger - you are simply putting the matters off till later by which time they'd probably be worst than before.

To just blame Tanya for Bhoomi's ill upbringing is wrong. Karan is just as much as fault as Tanya, if not more. Karan's lenience towards Bhoomi let money get to her head, blood-knit relations mean more to her than nurture relations and freedom became a need rather than a privilege. To add more, whenever Tanya tried to interfere in his ways, he kept hitting her with "You're not her mom. Nandini is" attitude. That I felt was low from Karan, who himself considers Tulsi his mother over Mandira who gave birth to him. Tanya is to be blamed as well. She stood by Bhoomi when she was wrong and that I feel is her only mistake in Bhoomi's upbringing but then again, if she didn't stand by her, Karan made sure to taunt her with "See, Nandini would've done this and that" attitude.

Self-defense, given. Protecting someone, sadly not given. Tulsi could have hit Ansh on his knees – it would've caused him just the same amount of pain but why did she hit him in the chest, right above his heart? She could've hit him in the shin, in the leg or on the knee and Nandini'd have got enough time to run away but why the heart? Wasn't Tulsi the one who believed that Gautam (who was truly rotten before Tulsi made a gentleman out of him) would reform? Why couldn't Tulsi do the same to Ansh? Ok. Ansh raped Nandini but Nandini never gave him enough attention to begin with. She married him, not by any force, she had her say. So it's implicated that Ansh wants attention from her but she had that saved for Karan – so why not marry him instead? Had she told Tulsi, Tulsi would've surely got the two married. And till this day, Tulsi believes it was "mukti". I'd like to see someone give HER "mukti" and see how she likes it.

As for your question, I think Ekta's portraying that the biological parents mean more than the nurturing parents. However, I think otherwise.

i agree i lil bit with both of u!!
slapping doesnt mean u r a better parent but come on u come to know ur daughter shot ur mom then obviosly u r not gonna think rationally!! u will be angry but tanya was like oh ur dad was wrong in being angry with u..thats the kinda expression she was giving..
i guess now after wat has happened karan will finally tell bhoomi the truth

Originally posted by: mz.seductive

As for your question, I think Ekta's portraying that the biological parents mean more than the nurturing parents. However, I think otherwise.

I agree! 😊 Completly...

I got in a fight with my mom today,haha! Ok,that was tottaly besides the point! 😳

i agree with both...in the end i can only say ekta is mad

Yea ekta is verrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyy mad n this serial is proving bad example on viewers on marriages, rivalry in the same house, social n family life, behaviour n respects for each other...this serial doesnt make sense ...it's stupid n digusting 🤢 😡

Slapping is a kekta- speciality to emhasize the dramatics in TV serials.
In real life, when chidren are grown-up they are not slapped.
Do not bring in real-life logic to judge TV serials. Each belong to different world.
just enjoy !

''Wasn't Tulsi the one who believed that Gautam (who was truly rotten before Tulsi made a gentleman out of him) would reform? Why couldn't Tulsi do the same to Ansh? Ok. Ansh raped Nandini but Nandini never gave him enough attention to begin with. She married him, not by any force, she had her say. So it's implicated that Ansh wants attention from her but she had that saved for Karan – so why not marry him instead? Had she told Tulsi, Tulsi would've surely got the two married. And till this day, Tulsi believes it was "mukti". I'd like to see someone give HER "mukti" and see how she likes it.''

I dont know what you talking about, Gautam was a spoilt brat he was not a killer, so for him to become good wasn't that difficult, he didn't commit any big crime.

As for ANSH, for to reform was out of the question, first he is killer, 2nd he raped NANDINI, and he treid to kill nandini as well, so for him to be shot on the chest was the best option.

Originally posted by: Mitun

''Wasn't Tulsi the one who believed that Gautam (who was truly rotten before Tulsi made a gentleman out of him) would reform? Why couldn't Tulsi do the same to Ansh? Ok. Ansh raped Nandini but Nandini never gave him enough attention to begin with. She married him, not by any force, she had her say. So it's implicated that Ansh wants attention from her but she had that saved for Karan – so why not marry him instead? Had she told Tulsi, Tulsi would've surely got the two married. And till this day, Tulsi believes it was "mukti". I'd like to see someone give HER "mukti" and see how she likes it.''

I dont know what you talking about, Gautam was a spoilt brat he was not a killer, so for him to become good wasn't that difficult, he didn't commit any big crime.

As for ANSH, for to reform was out of the question, first he is killer, 2nd he raped NANDINI, and he treid to kill nandini as well, so for him to be shot on the chest was the best option.

Yes he didn't commit any big crime. But don't you see? Nandini didn't give Ansh what a wife would've. Had she done that, surely Ansh wouldn't be so bad.

Sorry but I don't think that's a good enough reason to murder someone. What right does Tulsi have to decide who lives and who dies? She isn't God. Therefore, she must decide if she wants to end her OWN life rather than going around killing people. Tulsi does not have the right to take someone's life - unless self defense and in which case, she could have hit him on the knee instead of the heart. Everyone has the right to life as stated by the US Charter of Rights 2006-07. And even if Ansh is a killer - he is a human and therfore has the right to life - it's the police's job to hit him with a bullet (if need be) and term the case as an "encounter" not Tulsi's.