Posted:
Originally posted by: JyotiBThakur
Deepak, as you have your own set of assumptions "Dev must be sleeping with his girlfriends and all" and by adding "Some people" you are saying you are not targeting anyone, but these "Some people" belong to the same forum. And as much as they use these words "Some People" can make others think they are being targeted, they can think the same if it is written in your post too.
Now coming back to your POV, you have the right to have your own and i and other people have the right to have a different pov too. And according to me having girlfriends doesn't prove that the man is sleeping with them. This is the same man, who had a girlfriend 7 years back too. And he loved her the most, he still does. But he never even kissed the girl till the day they got married. So, why do you think "Some People" will believe that he must be sleeping with those girlfriends. Now, coming back to Dev, he was into alcohol for these 7 years. The first time when he was shown in the hotel room with Shruti he entered and started drinking and i remember Shruti's words "Now it'll be you and your bottle". I guess as we dissect every single dialogue of the show, this can be dissected too. What did she mean by that? Atleast i am clear about the fact that Dev used to spend his nights drinking. And let the episodes progress and lets see what exactly was in the past, whether it is about Dev or Sona. We don't know what all they have gone through in these 7 years.Again it is said that CVs will show that Dev didn't sleep with any of his girlfriends to glorify the character. Kyu bhai? They have given us enough reasons to be angry at him, at that time nobody said it was to butcher his character. But if at all something will be shown to prove he was not involved with any of his girlfriends, it'll be to glorify his character. Ye kaisa logic hai.Aise to ye bhi kaha ja sakta hai that CVs are glorifying Jatin's character to butcher Dev's character. If you can have your theories others too can have one. Right?This theory comes only when Dev is shown doing something good or is not shown at fault. Why? Is there a rule Dev Dixit cannot behave reasonable and can be correct too? Or is it a universal fact that he can only make mistakes? 😆😆 If he is not doing any mistakes CVs are glorifying the character. 😆😆 Insaan hai... Insaan correct bhi hote hai kabhi kabhi. 😆😆You have said CVs can do anything to glorify Dev's character. I can say they can do anything to prove Dev wrong and make him feel guilty. 😆 If they were to glorify one of the characters and butcher the other, they would have already shown both the leads absolutely correct never making mistakes but getting trapped in other's plans. 😆
@Bold-Brilliant point.
I respect everyone's POV who criticises Dev because there are reasons to criticise him.But the most ridiculous logic I hear is that if Dev does something good,then it's done to glorify him.I mean the CV's have left no opportunity to butcher Dev,where the hell do they glorify him?
When Dev does something wrong he is bashed left,right and centre.That is fine.If he does something wrong he should be bashed.
But if Dev does something good,he is being glorified.That's pure hypocrisy.
If we can have the anger to criticise a character for his mistakes,we should also have the heart to praise him when he does something good rather than exhibiting hypocrisy by making excuses that he is being glorified,etc etc.
That makes us neutral and unbiased viewers.
Fan Fictions
Anupamaa
