Silence!!! - Page 2

Originally posted by: tia.o

I know. Why is Dev's inability to handle his own temper somewhat becomes Sonakshi or for that matter Shruti's fault? As you said, if our previous generation of women stood up for every female victim and defended them instead of justifying the men, we'd be living in a world of equality.

Originally posted by: mily_mathew

Agree with u tia what dev did was not pardonable.It was wrong and how.But I don't want to bash him on the grounds of creative liberty.Its a show.But before saying what I want to say a small disclaimer.I am someone who believes in taking a stand.Spna was not at all empathetic or concerned towards Shruti.She clearly told her that this s d consequence of going after someone's money and charm.The old Sona would have been nurturing and caring towards shruti.But Sona yesterday Sona was cold ,manipulative(I think she did that in a subtle way)and vindictive.But I like this Sona.The one that lashes back,no nonsense kick ass one.But still I feel she was venting through Shruti.

Originally posted by: Tinkerfairy

Because fans have different yardstick to measure their standard.They want female to be ever understanding who is not human ,if she chose to ignore ,dare to go against male lead MCP behaviour ,their mind will go "how dare she ,can't she understand how much he "lou"her ,ya I know he insulted her ,threw her out ,manhandle her ,putting her down,but still how can you ignore his romance.Its your responsibility to understand him .he's poor guy in this don't you know.why Female lead doing So much ataychar on him,dont worry we will protect him." You know that's why indian television has barely any male lead character whom we can truly root for.all are made of same template male lead having major issues with forever understanding mahanta ki murat heroine.

Originally posted by: mily_mathew

Agree with u tia what dev did was not pardonable.It was wrong and how.But I don't want to bash him on the grounds of creative liberty.Its a show.But before saying what I want to say a small disclaimer.I am someone who believes in taking a stand.Spna was not at all empathetic or concerned towards Shruti.She clearly told her that this s d consequence of going after someone's money and charm.The old Sona would have been nurturing and caring towards shruti.But Sona yesterday Sona was cold ,manipulative(I think she did that in a subtle way)and vindictive.But I like this Sona.The one that lashes back,no nonsense kick ass one.But still I feel she was venting through Shruti.

Originally posted by: AngelsFlyAlone

She was clearly and quite obviously moved at everything. She's a woman, a human being. Doesn't she have any rights to have any emotions when her past comes tumbling before her eyes? She was also very uninterested to listen to Dev's business and asked to inform the receptionist for Shruti. That's hella classy. Also, there was no manipulation at all! She only used her experiences to tell Shruti to lash back! Did she hold her at gunpoint to mouth it all word for word to Dev? Isn't it common sense to use it in the correct context? Shruti is actually fantastic at ratta baazi so👏👏But man she forgot the logic quotient.

Originally posted by: flat_everest

Well!! Politicizing an issue ain't a good deed dear...With no harm to your repute in dis forum let m bring in a different pov here:

1.sorry dev threw dat ' I am what my name is gal out'.. that too without her shoes..Yes! He was wrong as a gentleman.But since leap he doesn't claim himself to b one. so I give him my benefit of doubt..That seems to b a posh hotel and d gal too must hav been chauffeur driven so she would hav been escorted back home safer..

2. Sonakshi by no means helped d other female.infact she led dar poor soul into d lion's den..Dev threw her out without harming her, Sona assured Sruti gets shown her place..U call dis help?? I don't think so

Lastly this show no where comes with a disclaimer dat it teaches u morality and female empowerment..Till date dey have lived in fiction with a slight touch of facts here and Dere..So rather Dan trying to finding an idealistic dev for your super feminist sonakshi bose, let's try to enjoy the new chapters of love n d names of suha and golu..

No harm no offense..

And tia I hav seen u praising sajedari show in one f your previous posts..I would suggest u try ek rishta swabhimaan in colors ..U might align well with the character s Dere esp Meghna and kunal..

Let dis not b treated as personal criticism..It's each one der own types!! I like dev and I like Sona too...I dislike ish but lov gkb no matter how money minded she s...I hav been watching TV since I was 5 and my serial experience says enjoy what's shown..

Originally posted by: tia.o

I didn't call you anything Sajni. Why are you thinking I am talking about you? I wrote a general post because I was shocked to see just how many people are ready to blame Sonakshi for being a human.

Tia being human is not the question here,our concern here is sona being judgemental and prejudiced. As i already said, i have no issues in her trying to help out, even willing to call the help desk for assistance so far so good. but the minute sona starts advising, that is where we feel the element of crass krept in. Being judgemental / prejudiced does not go well with any gender. this quality has to be abhorred irrespective of the gender.

I was surprised that other than Lavanya, not a single person opened a post talking about what Dev did. But every single person is talking about what Sonakshi didn't do or should have done.

What dev did with Shruthi earlier, is his reaction to her claims of love . shruti has every right to give it back to him in a way she feels fit. What sona did was fed her the necessary words which is not right. is that what shruti really wants to vent out at Dev or not no one knows. may be left to herself , either she might have pleaded her way around him ( like how sona came back to him inspite of being dumped earlier) or she would have bashed at him.

This is where sona over stepped her border. any thing between people going through a rough relationship should be said or done only by them. NO ONE needs to spoonfeed or preach the worthiness factor.

Why? My question is why should a woman has to be held in such a high standard?

Isn't she allowed to be human?

If her advice is coloured by her past, aren't our advice/comments/responses coloured by our past?

True our advises /comments/responses are always coloured by our own experiences and that is what makes them skewed. like you said in one of your own posts, the advise that asha gives to sona is skewed. similarly here, the advise that sona gave to shruti is skewed.

There are people here who is more concerned with how Sonakshi hurt Dev instead of thinking how Dev threw out a woman.

As is said in one of my earlier posts, i dont see any reason why we need to feel shruthi as a victim here. she has rattled a sore spot in her partner knowing very well that there is bound to be repercussions. to what extend and how derogative the retaliation will be, solely depends on the rawness of the sore spot. let's not oversee that she knew that Dev despises serious relationships. This fact is not hidden from her and if they were having a sexual relationship, the act was upon mutual consent.

This applies to both the genders, had it been that sona was in dev's place and her partner walks up to her and says she was ditched because she deserves it and if sona threw him out, i will still support sona as the other person had touched upon the sore spot.

So I am putting in my view.

I am sorry if my post felt personal to you. My post is against a thought process which always puts a man's pain over a woman's heartbreak.

I keep reading women are stronger than men. Are they? Or they have to be because no one empathize with their weaknesses?

Again as I said, it's not directed to any person in particular.