Prachi started of as a beautiful character, full of love, concern and sacrifice for all the people associated with her. She seemed to have abundant capacity to love and forgive even the people who wish her the worst. She had tremendous patience which literally wore down her adversaries. Of late, however, all her virtues seem to have the opposite effect not only on the characters in the show but also the viewers. Now why is that?
I always maintained that the writers have stuck to Prachi's characterisation and she was acting as she was expected to. But of late I get the feeling that her character is slowly but surely being butchered. This is why I feel so.
Do you remember Prachi very self righteously telling Neev that she will always stand by the truth when he tried to get Suki and Saket marry clandestinely? She was right in doing so and probably averted a huge catastrophe which would have errupted had the wedding taken place. But in this baby raaz case where is her sense of righteousness, her support for truth? She should have asked Suki to confide in Milsi long back when she found out about the baby. She allowed the baby to languish in an orphanage. Lets forgive her for her folly because ultimately she brought him into the house, though for not the right reasons.
Later when things came to a head and Ayesha exposed her version of the raaz she herself could not tell Milsi anything because it was Suki's raaz. She put Milsi through torture by claiming that the baby was hers, all to protect Suki. Lets give her a margin for that too since as I said earlier it was not her raaz to reveal.
But now that so much has happened and her plans to give a home to Ritwik is now in jeopardy since with baba hearing the 'truth' she knows that she will surely be thrown out with the kid, why is she still bent on protecting the raaz? Who is benefitting from it? Not herself, nor her husband, nor Neev who has wrongly been accused (and here her support for truth rings really hollow. Why should an innocent man take the blame? And the deeds he is up to, to avenge his reputation loss, is doing her husband no good either). And I am sure Suki is not benefitting from it either. The girl could not even grieve properly for the supposed loss of her son. And living this lie all her life, she will feel all the more guilty, especially if she realises that she was the cause for her brother and sis-in-law breaking up and her son will be languishing some where, with Prachi raising him single handedly (mostly in poverty I guess since she does not appear smart enough to make a living).
The short point I want to make is what is the 'truth' that Prachi stand for as far as this secret goes?
The next big statement she had made in another context which again rings hollow in this case is what she told Milsi in the waterfall scene, that she considers her marriage as her life . Now all that she has been doing so far raises serious doubts as to what marriage means to her. If the respect she shows for it through her actions is anything to go by, then all I can say is that she does not respect her life very much, does she? I would have tolerated her silence and acceptance of blame so far because Suki was not there and in her absence she cannot take the liberty of revealing the truth. Now that she is back why is she still insisting that Suki should maintain the same silence? Is Suki's marriage more important than hers? If she still wants to protect Suki from Alaap's black mail, Baba's scorn and pain and Saket's rejection if the truth comes out, what is the argument for protecting the raaz from Milsi, especially if by doing so her marriage and his peace and happiness are at stake?
For me the creatives are butchering the beautiful character called Prachi, all with the intention of heightening the drama element and portraying the extent of her sacrifice. Instead of invoking sympathy for her, this is only making her character more repulsive by the day.