Valid marriage - Page 3

How does that matter

Future is evident one will claim I am your wife other will claim wife plus would be mother

Husband are main Hoon kaun 🤣

Welcome to gol gol circus

Thanks to ekta and star plus and ksg I am out of it ❤️

Keep enjoying 🤗

Originally posted by: NoraSM

No. My point was generally when they show marriage rituals on television, these marriage rituals are not complete. They don't recite correct mantras, they don't do pheras in correct order, Hindu Marriage is way more than Sindoor and mangalsutra.

But according to the TM, all it takes is a man filling hairline of a woman in front of Devi ma, then all this happened between Parth and Erica too, I am not saying that they are married or KSG married Erica etc. I am saying that it is more than sindoor in head and therefore these people are not married like AnuPre are not married

Lolworthy.. thats quite obvious unless ppl want to be delusional..

just imagine if Men would walk around on the street and filing women’s hairline.. that means marriage done?

See they never showed RB and PRB signing any papers, but they were legally married.. and the same apply for AB and Komolika Chaubey Basu..

Ppl who consider AP married based on exchanging dhaaga and flying sindur should go back and watch the epi where pandit did say their wedding was incomplete, thats why they were facing problem.. Thus AB wiped Pre’s sindur and broke the dhaaga with the intentions of ending this incomplete marriage.. unlike when kukki unintentionally broke the mangulsutra..

Originally posted by: mithilalovesksg

How does that matter

Future is evident one will claim I am your wife other will claim wife plus would be mother

Husband are main Hoon kaun 🤣

Welcome to gol gol circus

Thanks to ekta and star plus and ksg I am out of it ❤️

Keep enjoying 🤗

I doubt if Pre will fight again.. I mean perhaps it will be like you cant put pressure on his brain etc etc

Originally posted by: nailah_AnuPre

I doubt if Pre will fight again.. I mean perhaps it will be like you cant put pressure on his brain etc etc

Don't know may be

Anyways I am least interested now

They can do whatever they want 😆

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Two people in love don't need marriage to bind them, they don't marry for themselves, they are already together, marriage is done for society and law.

When Anurag put that sindoor in her head, he didn't say that he is marrying her, they were getting married the next day, it takes more than Sindoor for a marriage to take place, people who run away are intelligent enough to do complete marriage rituals according to their religion or they get married in court. It's not a joke like putting sindoor in head, that too before Prerna and Bajaj's divorce papers are filed in a court.

To prove their marriage they need a witness, proof of wedding day (Pictures) etc.

First of all, marriage shouldn't be binding u, it should be setting u free. See, how a wilful half marriage and forced full marriage makes a difference...seeing prerna in last two episodes can prove that.

Secondly, there's something called gandharva marriage where u get married to eachother secretly, nobody being a witness to it. I m not sure if it is valid in the eyes of law or not. But that exists too since the same era from when this social marriage exists. Last time too, Anupre believed in their dhaga shaadi, those who mattered to them believed in it, society believed in it eventually. Well, those who don't want to believe it, won't believe it even after u r legally married...like mohini n the likes.

Thirdly, this time, Anurag put sindhoor consciously n he believed the marriage is done. It is prerna's wish to get married in all taam jhaam because she is that fairy tale believer girl and just to make her happy, he was ready to get married with all other rituals the next day. This is not my theory, this was shown in the episode.

And it's better if we don't talk about divorce of prerna and bajaj because if we have to get into the legalities, just pulling off the wedding dhaaga can't nullify the marriage, so Anupre's divorce too was pending when bajaj got married to prerna which again makes bajaj's marriage invalid too. Like how just putting dhaaga and sindhoor doesn't make people married, pulling off the dhaaga and wiping off the sindhoor too shouldn't make them divorced.

Both attempts of Anupre's social marriage were just like the renewal of vows...just done for prerna's happiness because she loves rituals wali shaadi. Like how ur remarriage doesn't nullify Ur original marriage, rituals wali shaadi doesn't nullify ur dhaaga or sindhoor Shaadi too.

And if u still want to tell me about law and society, I have clearly mentioned in the first line of my post itself that I m not going into how marriages work in real life, it is all based on what they r showing us in the episodes. Because one thing I m sure every viewer of kzk agrees upon is kzk is way too far from reality.

Originally posted by: mithilalovesksg

Don't know may be

Anyways I am least interested now

They can do whatever they want 😆

Me too.. just waiting to see couple of scenes for my satisfaction 😝

Originally posted by: nailah_AnuPre

Me too.. just waiting to see couple of scenes for my satisfaction 😝

I can imagine what you refer to Dil ko sukuun mile wale that type we can watch on insta clips that scenes insta will be flooded 🤣

Originally posted by: NoraSM

No. My point was generally when they show marriage rituals on television, these marriage rituals are not complete. They don't recite correct mantras, they don't do pheras in correct order, Hindu Marriage is way more than Sindoor and mangalsutra.

But according to the TM, all it takes is a man filling hairline of a woman in front of Devi ma, then all this happened between Parth and Erica too, I am not saying that they are married or KSG married Erica etc. I am saying that it is more than sindoor in head and therefore these people are not married like AnuPre are not married

I think u should say according to the kzk writers reading the first line of my topic itself.

I have nowhere given my opinion in the main post. If I have to give my opinion on anything, I don't accept Pre-Bajaj marriage. But from what the makers have shown, I have said it was totally legal and valid.

Originally posted by: nailah_AnuPre

Lolworthy.. thats quite obvious unless ppl want to be delusional..

just imagine if Men would walk around on the street and filing women’s hairline.. that means marriage done?

See they never showed RB and PRB signing any papers, but they were legally married.. and the same apply for AB and Komolika Chaubey Basu..

Ppl who consider AP married based on exchanging dhaaga and flying sindur should go back and watch the epi where pandit did say their wedding was incomplete, thats why they were facing problem.. Thus AB wiped Pre’s sindur and broke the dhaaga with the intentions of ending this incomplete marriage.. unlike when kukki unintentionally broke the mangulsutra..

I don't think people here understand the basic concept of marriage 🤔 it's just something entirely different.

If I go in KZK world, then Anurag himself broke the dhaga and wiped Prerna's sindoor, he did this to end his marriage, his marriage was not registered so they can't get divorced in court.

Cookie is a child who broke the mangalsutra but marriage is more than sindoor and mangalsutra, Bajaj married Prerna in front of the society and they did every ritual, there was no intention from him to end the marriage when Cookie broke it, when there was an intention to end the marriage, he got divorce papers ready because his marriage was a registered one

Originally posted by: Aarohi2009

Yes you are right marriage doesn't become nullified if it's not registered but from 2014 registration of marriage is compulsory acc. to hindu marriage Act.

But shadi ka kuch to proof ya witness hona hi chahiye chahe shadi mandir mein hi kyon na hui ho.

Otherwise to live in relation ko bhi shadi hi bola jata.

Aur agar anupree shadi valid thi toh bajaj ne kaise prerna se shadi kar li😂🤣woh bhi toh nullified honi chahiye.anurag ko bolna chahiye tha prerna meri biwi hai😂Aur usse divorce tum kyon de rahe ho???

My head is spinning 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

U haven't watched the episodes since day 1, so u have all these doubts, I can understand 😂

Well, Anupre Shaadi had a witness...mandir Ka pandit ji...he only had attested Anupre marriage.

Well, this show is driven by ekta's ego and viewers' love for Anupre. Ekta had to bring her iconic characters komo and bajaj by hook or crook. And in her ego trip, she fails to understand that this time, she herself has established Anupre so beautifully that viewers are invested in them, and this is not 2001 era too where forced marriage of leads will be accepted. Viewers accept any kasauti and separation of the leads as long as they r not showed to be married to someone else. And while balancing her own ego and viewers' choice, she has to play with marriages to make and break the pairs. She got Anu married to komo but in a fear of loosing the viewership and gradually establishing komo, showed Anupre married first thus nullifying the anukomo marriage. Komo could never get established as Anu's wife, not even for few days, and exited the show. There came the next product of ekta's ego trip at a wrong timing...Mr Bajaj. Had she given some time to Anupre and parted them due to some not so lame reason and then brought in bajaj, the characters could have been established and accepted better. But he arrived when Anupre were much in love, were loved by audience and married as per their own writing. The anupre marriage which they themselves desperately established for last 3-4 months became a hurdle in way of bringing bajaj. So conveniently, ekta made any pull off that dhaga and wipe off the sindhoor saying let's get married socially...and with pulling off the dhaaga, the marriage got nullified and bajaj got to marry prerna. Thus, for their convenience, makers have never kept any legality between Anupre marriage, it has always been gandharva style divine marriage, done with belief and blessed by Durga maa...that is the premise of this show since day 1.