Is this marriage valid ? - Page 2

Originally posted by: sumaiya0151

😕 Am i the only one who feels that both of this marriage is invalid.As 1st one was done secetly & 2nd one was done when perna was pregnant cj as far as i know pregnant women is not allowed to get married.

That's not the case. If a woman is pregnant with another man's child at the time of her wedding with a different person and has not told him about the baby, that person can claim the marriage null and void. But as Mr Bajaj knew about the baby and still married, the marriage remains legal.

Originally posted by: najma123

Well, I need to be seriously studying Company Law but I decided to read the Hindu Marriage Act instead, my general frustration towards life is at its peak. 😆

Okay, so I am not quoting the bare act, but it bottles down to this, if Bajaj goes to court saying at the time of marriage, he did not know P was pregnant with someone else's kid (person other than petitioner), then the marriage can be considered null or void. Only if HE petitions. Which means it is voidable. Not void. Which also means, if he does not make a petition, the marriage is valid. [Section 12(1)(d)]

The next one is interesting actually.

As per Section 12(1)(c), if Prerna petitions that at the time of the marriage, she did not know about RB's kid (a material fact about him and the circumstance) OR

her consent was obtained by force or fraud (coercion)

then the marriage can be annulled, which means it is voidABLE. Not Void.

HOWEVER, Prerna cannot do either of those NOW, because, reading the above with 12(2)(a)(ii), she chose to live with him despite being aware of the force and after discovering the fraud (material fact about his daughter).

So, yeah, the marriage is pretty much valid. So sorry if I bored you guys with provisions, I am too bored for life, and was attempting to read law. 😆 Btw, I have ignored that dhaaga marriage or whatever they showed coz I never watched it and I can't go back and watch now, so idk if something else applies.

You actually took so much of pain to read about the laws , that too, to find logic in this show where writers take weed before writing stuff?😆

Originally posted by: SnehaDoll

You actually took so much of pain to read about the laws , that too, to find logic in this show where writers take weed before writing stuff?😆

Sneha one question

Don't you think you are here insulting weed? Just curious to know. 🤣

Originally posted by: najma123

Well, I need to be seriously studying Company Law but I decided to read the Hindu Marriage Act instead, my general frustration towards life is at its peak. 😆

Okay, so I am not quoting the bare act, but it bottles down to this, if Bajaj goes to court saying at the time of marriage, he did not know P was pregnant with someone else's kid (person other than petitioner), then the marriage can be considered null or void. Only if HE petitions. Which means it is voidable. Not void. Which also means, if he does not make a petition, the marriage is valid. [Section 12(1)(d)]

The next one is interesting actually.

As per Section 12(1)(c), if Prerna petitions that at the time of the marriage, she did not know about RB's kid (a material fact about him and the circumstance) OR

her consent was obtained by force or fraud (coercion)

then the marriage can be annulled, which means it is voidABLE. Not Void.

HOWEVER, Prerna cannot do either of those NOW, because, reading the above with 12(2)(a)(ii), she chose to live with him despite being aware of the force and after discovering the fraud (material fact about his daughter).

So, yeah, the marriage is pretty much valid. So sorry if I bored you guys with provisions, I am too bored for life, and was attempting to read law. 😆 Btw, I have ignored that dhaaga marriage or whatever they showed coz I never watched it and I can't go back and watch now, so idk if something else applies.

Kudos to you and your patience, for checking the facts for this show.

Facts and ekta shows are two different sides of a coin.

Not just facts

Even logics too.

But still thanks for letting us know the Law.

i have seen a lot of shows where girl gets married while pregnant.In such shows, marriages were pretty legal..i don't think tv makers follow actual rituals...they follow as per their convenience...firstly they showed temple marriage of anupre as legal...like the pandit said prerna is the first wife of anurag...but when bajaj entered the show...prerna was supposed to marry bajaj...so makers made anupre temple marriage adhi adhuri...they did a pooja to annul the marriage...which was weird...🐷

Originally posted by: sumaiya0151

Perna & Anurag didn't get married officially but, they didn't divorce either. And when perna was pregnant that time she married Bajaj . Is it allowed in Hindu religion to get married while a woman is pregnant ?

Its a big joke. They went by track convenience thats it!

Ideally, prerna was the one who proved that she and anu were married. She got mahila mukti involved and proclaimed to be mrs anurag basu.

So ys, considering tht, bajaj and prerna marriage is nt valid even if the rituals were carried out in front of the society just like anukom marriage.

since when anupre got married,that dhaaga marriage was not a marriage in my eyes...marriage is not a game,put sindoor and dhaaga than marriage is done....it has proper rituals...saat phere vows and vachan that husband-wife takes together

anu-komo marriage is a real one,they had proper rituals and promises taken together as husband-wife

fandom might call it a marriage,normal viewer like me will never accept it as a marriage...they were not married but they did had pre-marital consummation that leads to them being soon-to-be parents

who says that pregnant women can't marry...pregnant women can marry

so what divorce people are talking abt

if this dhaaga marriage is a marriage instead of marrying bajaj whatever deal he made,being anurag's wife prerna would have slap bajaj for that deal he made...no married women would have tolerate such deal,its an insult. If prerna herself accept the proposal it means whatever happen in the temple is not a marriage in her eyes too

coming to komo track and she claims being anu's wife,she just wanted to teach basus...anu...komo a big fat lesson especially anu for destroying her life

marriage is what happened b/w bajaj-prerna with proper rituals...vows and promises and if prerna wants to leave this marriage and have made a firm decision to go back to anurag and wants to spend her life with him than prerna has to go through proper divorce procedure with bajaj and i am sure the shrwed..sharp n smart businessman he definitely must have registered the marriage

Originally posted by: prb4eva

Sneha one question

Don't you think you are here insulting weed? Just curious to know. 🤣

True 😆

God knows what they eat before writing such illogical things . And the best part is they have Ghajini memory .

Originally posted by: SnehaDoll

True 😆

God knows what they eat before writing such illogical things . And the best part is they have Ghajini memory .

Yes this I fully agree. If you really think from story point of view, there is no progress post prerish marriage till now.

They are clueless what to show next.

So they are just forming a circle and doing round and round.

Originally posted by: prb4eva

Yes this I fully agree. If you really think from story point of view, there is no progress post prerish marriage till now.

They are clueless what to show next.

So they are just forming a circle and doing round and round.

Honestly I m not supporting PreRish or AnuPre this season. Nothing makes sense anymore :(

But everytime I see your dp and siggy 😭, I miss RR/PRB so much ❤️