Well, No offence but I happen to think that Sam's attitude is wrong so is Bajaj. And I don't htink that Prerna and Anu ever neglected their spouses. It's not their fault that they have two worlds...literally they'll always be connected coz they share children!! But Bajaj and Sam have only one world...so obviously they have nothing to do with anyone else. Does that make them rite and AP wrong? I don't think so!! How can they demand that A/P stop seeing someone they had a kid with? Any thing happens to Prem or Sneha obviously they have to solve together....Do they have to schedule days on which to meet their kids so they don't bump into each-other? Have two Prem samaadi's? Thatz just silly.... 😕
I am not saying it is wrong in keeping their friendship! Agreed both of them have 2 worlds where as sam and bajaj only has 1, but if they want to keep these 2 worlds, they should know how to maintain both of them!! If they dont know how to give required priority to both of them, dont u think it is better they dont maintain them! Spouse commands more priority than friendship, but if it happens the other way round, then i dont think that friendship is right (this i am talkng about anu-sam). Ok agreed in prerna's case it is a misunderstanding as bajaj thought prerna told anurag that she still loves him, and he thought she only told anurag about sneha killing kamini! Ok i do agree that bajaj asking anurag to cut off from prerna for ever is wrong, but it is prerna-anurag who brought situations to this extent! What is the need for both of them to go on talking about their past and their past love, and that also so loudly that both their respective spouses heard!! Bajaj had never opposed prerna-anurag's relation, neither had sam! It is just now when things crossed limits that they have a problem!
All i am saying is keep both friendship and love, there is no harm, but see to it that both sides are happy, especially the side which requires higher priority! Thats all 😊 !!