Posted:
Prerna and Anurag's Double Standards:
Shravan is being negative because he has aparna-debu's bad blood. Shravan is being negative in spite of the righteous upbringing Anurag gave him.
But in case of Udi, Udi is being negative because of the wrong upbringing that Aparna gave him.
So- Shravan is bad because BLOOD is thicker than PARVARISH.
But UDI is bad because PARVARISH is thicker than BLOOD.
How convenient na ! If ur parvarish goes wrong, blame it on his blood. If your blood is doing horrible crimes, blame it on his parvarish !!!
Aparna's blood and her parvarish, both are bad. Anurag's blood and parvarish both are good. He is not to be blamed for Shravan and UDI's wrong behaviour, because he is Anurag Basu.
During the kasak-shravan affair, they run away from home. Prerna, Anurag and Bajaj go to police station. I clearly remember that Prerna spoke about Shravan's blood. She said Shravan is like this because of his blood- his mother.
Last week, Anurag also spoke about Shravan's blood.
When Prerna and Anurag talk about Shravan's blood, it is justified because Shravan's behaviour is wrong, hence they are compelled to say all that.
Now when Bajaj spoke about Sneha's blood, he was drunk, and hurt. Sneha had supported her real parents in the court case. From Bajaj's point of view, Sneha was supporting her real father(anurag)- the man who tried to kill her foster father(bajaj). In spite of all the love that Bajaj gave her, she had chosen to support Bajaj's murderer. And, she slapped Bajaj's real daughter. Obivously, he was as hurt as anurag was , and he was really misled into thinking all the wrong things. He would have never said it, had he known the truth. still Anurag, Prerna and Sneha made him literally cry and beg for a 'maafi'. He immediately accepted his mistake. But look at Anurag and Prerna....they go on taunting Shravan on his blood, and they don't even feel guilty. They are lead pair of the serial. But neither of them has any morality left now. Bajaj ofcourse, is no saint. Though I support him these days, one cannot ignore his wrong deeds in the past. All three of them are SO WRONG.
Shravan is being negative because he has aparna-debu's bad blood. Shravan is being negative in spite of the righteous upbringing Anurag gave him.
But in case of Udi, Udi is being negative because of the wrong upbringing that Aparna gave him.
So- Shravan is bad because BLOOD is thicker than PARVARISH.
But UDI is bad because PARVARISH is thicker than BLOOD.
How convenient na ! If ur parvarish goes wrong, blame it on his blood. If your blood is doing horrible crimes, blame it on his parvarish !!!
Aparna's blood and her parvarish, both are bad. Anurag's blood and parvarish both are good. He is not to be blamed for Shravan and UDI's wrong behaviour, because he is Anurag Basu.
During the kasak-shravan affair, they run away from home. Prerna, Anurag and Bajaj go to police station. I clearly remember that Prerna spoke about Shravan's blood. She said Shravan is like this because of his blood- his mother.
Last week, Anurag also spoke about Shravan's blood.
When Prerna and Anurag talk about Shravan's blood, it is justified because Shravan's behaviour is wrong, hence they are compelled to say all that.
Now when Bajaj spoke about Sneha's blood, he was drunk, and hurt. Sneha had supported her real parents in the court case. From Bajaj's point of view, Sneha was supporting her real father(anurag)- the man who tried to kill her foster father(bajaj). In spite of all the love that Bajaj gave her, she had chosen to support Bajaj's murderer. And, she slapped Bajaj's real daughter. Obivously, he was as hurt as anurag was , and he was really misled into thinking all the wrong things. He would have never said it, had he known the truth. still Anurag, Prerna and Sneha made him literally cry and beg for a 'maafi'. He immediately accepted his mistake. But look at Anurag and Prerna....they go on taunting Shravan on his blood, and they don't even feel guilty. They are lead pair of the serial. But neither of them has any morality left now. Bajaj ofcourse, is no saint. Though I support him these days, one cannot ignore his wrong deeds in the past. All three of them are SO WRONG.
