About the show in general
Today episode was also very specific. I like Tv shows being objective and specific instead of going haywire and open to lot of meaning
If a story writer has written a scene straightforward, i dont want to put in my own interpretation to the scene.
I want to believe what the story writer wants to tell the viewers.His/her view point.
For example- If laali is shown talking nonsense about meera to mrs roma kapoor. The meaning is straight and simple. Laali dislikes Meera.Thats the message of the story writers and prodcution team
wants to pass to the viewers through the scene. Now if a viewer suppose interpretes it as- no, laali has loved meera lot and since meera never reciprocated that love and silky got ignored. thats why she is unhappy or else laali is not bad.
So this interpretation may not be what the production house wants to tell.
Similaly if Meera and Vivaan are interacting or have some tender moments looking at each other we have to understand that they are not in love and the concern they show is subjective to situations. The concern is not out of love. Because the show and the Production team has not given any scene to explain the feelings of Meevan.
So if a scene of meevan happens i dont think it can be assumed they are head over heels in love or are having silent communication. We have to follow the interpretation of the story makers because its them who are developin the characters and show.Like the laali example given above i feel, its best if we follow what the creatives have interpreted it as
and not reading too much between the lines.
we can question logic, continuity thats ok.
but if the showmakers want to tell us through the show that, No.meevan are not even having undercurrents at present, so Just seeing meevan scenes we cant assume that love has started.
We have to wait for scenes that will tell that Yes their undercurrents have started. Officially we have to wait for dialogues to substantiate that.
Because even in todays episode meevan are stil not at same page and their vision ahead is different.Vivaan wants to wrap up the issue and go back london. He wants closure. As what makers have shown us.
And meera? Since she is showing interest in vivaan's mom related issues again we cannnot interprete that she wants to ignore divorce and stop vivaan. Unless the makers clarify what is meera going to do, we have to wait and watch.
Whenevr there is trips and falls, getting entangled and staring at each other the makers may be want to tell us that viewers look its a daily show we have to build up moments of eye contact, momentary attraction.
dont build dreams that they are in process of developing love so soon.wait for us to show some elaborate scenes to show that they have started falling for each other.
Not before that,
why iam telling this because few years back rajan shahi had a show on sony TV which was a remake of a pakistani drama.Somefans sent him some questions asking why the doctor character is behaving like the lead of an XYZ show? his charcater seems to have shifted like the businessman heroes of other shows.
Rajan shahi replied that who told you to interprete the character you deemed fit? i had always envisioned that my character may be a doctor but he is the typical brooding hero too who has a different side.
so reading such instances from tv stalwarts make me think that we have to see kaleerein from the eye glasses of the Cvs not on whims and fancies.
Films whether hollywood or bollywood does have chance for viewers to interprete a scene and characters.But this luxury is not in Tv. Tv is meant to be specific. Allaudin Khilji in Padmaavat can be seen as either an utterly disgusting savage or an obsessed lover to win his posession. Interpretaion is open to viewers.
Vivvan and Meera have been created by Triangle films. We have to see how the makers have interpreted their characters .Does it match with how we see them or not, time will tell.
so not hurrying for any conclusion as of now.
Edited by clairvoyance - 7 years ago
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
Book Talk
