Posted:
Originally posted by: Drivemecracy
what do u mean by guilty do u believe he is trying to extort or threatening vg.this is what vg says.does this looks believable. I think its the other way actually.Or u r pointing about the grp or audio it is a private conversation.true or not a private conversation.not related to the case at all.i think parth should not open his mouth they are pretty much screwing themselves.i think if he talked ill about niti he should fail in the case niti would file for talking digesting stuff.not for vgs case.
Is it absolutely necessary for VG alone to be the liar? We have to be neutral and see both sides of the coin before jumping to a conclusion. I accept that I was eerily turned off after all accusations came up against Parth. I was like... how can someone go that bad? I felt that there were loose ends to both their stories which is why i feel that both of them r hiding something. The issue is much deeper than what they state it to be.
Anyways, I was talking about the WA controversy. The stuff that was supposedly discussed in the group was pretty nasty and not something which would make him walk around with his head held high. From the way he grew defensive, I feel it cud be true.
Kumkum Bhagya
Anupamaa
