Where is the trust? - Page 3

Originally posted by: AreYaar

Too late...should have trended for THAT specifically in time then😆...cuz there were never any guarantees of a SENSIBLE storyline for Manik's return😛...Aam khaao, guthliyon ko kyun ginte ho😆

Originally posted by: shar1988

But I don't trend,I just suffer the consequences of others' trending

So let me rant na because I never got to eat any of these aams😭

Originally posted by: AreYaar

Aams are coming in the form of romance soon, no doubt...so don't worry...tab yeh sab "logic" and "sensibility" ke naare bhool jaayenge sab...end mein sirf ek hi aam se matlab hai sabko😆

Originally posted by: shar1988

Offscreen drama ke baad ab toh sabko shadow romance jaise khokle aam ke saath hi guzara karna padhega.😆

Aamsutra toh ab fans ke sapnon mein hi hoga😳

Originally posted by: AreYaar

So you do admit then ki wait toh romance ki ho rahi hai😛

Why crying over "logic" then? Pshhht😆

Originally posted by: Samilicious..

Anuuu 🤗 🤗 Haha I just got excited to see you here... Seeing you after a very long time. Kaise Ho? I had a VM request for you *hidesface*


Sorry TM I have no idea what's happening in the show... But don't expect any logic in S2 because S1 itself ended illogically. Damn it I miss S1. The good old days which, can't come back no matter how much they try.

Originally posted by: sanjana

Well written Gypsy. You are unbiased to accept there is some flaw. Otherwise I find that many consider Manik as flawless character. I am reposting the message which I had posted in another thread.

I always want CVs to explore this angle. I have always felt Manik as a very passionate lover. In real life people who are so passionate are obsessive and possessive people as well. If Nandhini thinks that he wanted to achieve and when her priorities seemingly change will Manik be able to handle the same on his own or he needs support from Nandhini to make him understand. He is not able to tolerate a simple thing of she being happy without him. CVs instead of continuously portraying as a doting lover as was shown in season 1 can explore different shades if they want to show something different. But let them not make the character a psycho type but the passionate has got a different side also. So CVs pls explore the same and show something different and make it interesting

Originally posted by: priakachan

<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4" color="#0000ff">It's not the trust factor. Manik knows that Fab 3 members love him...he knows that Nandini loves him. But when we return to our loved ones, we always want to see a happiness on their face on seeing us. Think from Manik's perspective. What if we were in his place?? The girl he loved and who always runs to him...even to check if he is there in real or hallucination..was not even leaving the stage and looked at him coldly and turned back to look at Maddy and smiling and talking to them. Aise cold reaction tho Manik expect nahi kar rahe the. He is not sad coz he misunderstood that she is in love with Maddy or something ...Manik is upset that she reacted that way. He wanted her to run upto him to atleast check if he was hallucination or something...touch him...and ask..."Manik ye tum hi ho? tum zinda ho?" He expected a warm hug..and happiness on her face to see him alive. Magar aisa kuch nahi hua!😆</font>

<font color="#0000ff" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4">I can totally understand why Manik reacted that way.😛</font>

Originally posted by: shar1988

How can Manik, even angry and disappointed question Nandu's love for him. It is not about trust, it is about the basic foundation of their love.

Manik's reaction shows that he thinks that Nandu's love for him is so weak that she forgot about him in a span of 4 months. This throws a spanner on everything they had built for a year. How can he doubt Nandu's love for him after all they have been through?? This was not supposed to be the same impulsive, temperamental Manik we started with, his character underwent tremendous growth atleast with regards to his relationship with Nandini, which they have just negated.