If not kamal then it's pallavi - Page 2

lol i agree and it does make sense but i dont think there is anything else to be relieved

anything can possible in ekta's series.

A bit offtopic but the women in the asylum may be working with whoever is doing all this but it still doesnt make sense because when all the agarwals went to see parvati, trishna was thinking to herself that parvati has really gone mad but that could be because she wants the nurse to think that parvti has gone mad and report back to teh kidnappers so they can free parvati.

what do you think?

i dont think its suyesh.i think its kamal who has done the kidnapping..lets c

definitely not Suyash. He has been very sincere in trying 2 get Parvati out of the asylum. i hope ekta continues keeping things that way.

I don't think it can be suyash. His only motive would be to get revenge for sheiker, but that seems really unlikely and illogical as it was suyash's testimoney that sent sheiker to jail. And no one forced him to tell the truth, least of all Parvati who did'nt even know that Suyash had proof of his son's guilt. Also Suyash doesn't need to do all this kidnapping stuff, he could just sue the Agarwals for the loss his business suffered, and have them thrown out on the streets. Which he could have done before but he got Trishna's dad to save them. Then again it is true that you never know what Ekta has in store for the viewers. I mean this is the woman that tried to pass off Kammel as a bad guy, who attempts to make Parvati mad. I mean why would he freak out at Parvati, when he spent so many years almost going mad himself when he was married to Pallavi?
And that too over being treated badly?
Anyway what do you all think?