Director Santram Verma 'abuses' and 'hits' actor on the set of Naagin - Page 3

Tfs!

Originally posted by: mehaksingh13

Arey ani paridhi is married actress why do u sing her bhajan😡 mistake is hers only as a married actress for santu's fault also. she is unprofessional😡. in thrashing the senior artiste on nagin set also pari's mistake and unprofessionalism🤢 she encouraged others to be unprofessional and complain or behave like this according to santu bhajan mandal 😭he he.

😆😆

Originally posted by: mehaksingh13

Atleast people realise what is paridhi and how much toture she faced in the hands of this worst director who is not at all a boss who can work intandom with his team nd extract result from them. cinta shd take serious action nd kick him out of the profession for sometimes till his mental status becomes alright.

Originally posted by: mehaksingh13

Arey ani paridhi is married actress why do u sing her bhajan😡 mistake is hers only as a married actress for santu's fault also. she is unprofessional😡. in thrashing the senior artiste on nagin set also pari's mistake and unprofessionalism🤢 she encouraged others to be unprofessional and complain or behave like this according to santu bhajan mandal 😭he he.

true mehak Pari is really Superwoman, evn nt being a part of the show, she influence a senior actor to go against Santu The Great, wow to begumsa lol. Bt I'm proud of my brave begumsa.

Originally posted by: indudolai

Tfs!

I can't waste my precious comment on sv the grt!

I jst want to say pari was never at fault. ...and this forum always speak bad abt her...unprofessional huh...ya ryt... calling chutiya, holding some1's throat , hitting on chest is professionalism👍🏼

Aurat aurat ki dhusman and that to without reason

godbless pari and be urself always!

Indu me too have no comments. I guess now people know that paridhi was correct. I still remember the hurtful words spoken to paridhi in this very forum that because of paridhi the great director SV had to leave n that pari throws tantrums and what not. They even said success got to her head!! Really pari was right to stand up to him. N people give him credit for success of JA? It was coincidence that he directed JA at a time when story and acting was perfect. I wonder where his expertise went when he directed ETR and TEI which are both flops

Originally posted by: karishma.s

Indu me too have no comments. I guess now people know that paridhi was correct. I still remember the hurtful words spoken to paridhi in this very forum that because of paridhi the great director SV had to leave n that pari throws tantrums and what not. They even said success got to her head!! Really pari was right to stand up to him. N people give him credit for success of JA? It was coincidence that he directed JA at a time when story and acting was perfect. I wonder where his expertise went when he directed ETR and TEI which are both flops

i think it is a sad situation, SV has been working with ekta for many years and has directed many shows and actors but never was he a controversial director, it all began with JA, but i must say he did a great job with the actors and made the sets look grand, especially i loved the way Rajat's jalal shaped up initially and what acting!..i guess he needs help with anger management and more than that he needs a break if his financial situation permits otherwise his career will be at stake with such controversies!

Originally posted by: ghalibmirza

i think it is a sad situation, SV has been working with ekta for many years and has directed many shows and actors but never was he a controversial director, it all began with JA, but i must say he did a great job with the actors and made the sets look grand, especially i loved the way Rajat's jalal shaped up initially and what acting!..i guess he needs help with anger management and more than that he needs a break if his financial situation permits otherwise his career will be at stake with such controversies!

1ST GRANDEUR OF SET DEPENDS ON D MONEY SPENT N THAT DEPENDS ON PRODUCTION TEAM N CHANNEL TEAM..SV HAS NO ROLE IN IT BEING A TV SHOW DIRECTOR..

Originally posted by: jojaparijat

1ST GRANDEUR OF SET DEPENDS ON D MONEY SPENT N THAT DEPENDS ON PRODUCTION TEAM N CHANNEL TEAM..SV HAS NO ROLE IN IT BEING A TV SHOW DIRECTOR..

2ND JALAL'S CHARACTERIZATION DEPENDS ON D SCRIPT N SV HAS NO ROLE IN IT.

3RD BY SAYING RAJAT'S ACTING WAS AMAZING DURING SV'S DIRECTION...UR QUESTIONING HIS TALENT N CALIBER TOO.

4TH SV'S CHARACTER IS LYK THAT.. HIS CHARACTER DIDN'T CHANGE SUDDENLY DURING JA...HE WAS LYK THAT ONLY..IT BECAME A NEWS ONLY DURING JA WHEN 90 MEMBERS WERE OUTSED N EK WAS QUESTIONED IN TIGER TRACK PROMOTIONS..IT BECAME A NEWS..OTHERWISE EVN THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN UNDER WRAPS.

5TH HIS PROBLM IS NOT ONLY ANGER MANAGEMENT BUT SOMETHING MORE THN THAT.. HE HAS SUPERIORITY COMPLEX.

AFTR ALL THIS PLS TELL ME WHO IS UNPROFESSIONAL...IS IT PARIDHI OR SV?

Originally posted by: jojaparijat

1ST GRANDEUR OF SET DEPENDS ON D MONEY SPENT N THAT DEPENDS ON PRODUCTION TEAM N CHANNEL TEAM..SV HAS NO ROLE IN IT BEING A TV SHOW DIRECTOR..

2ND JALAL'S CHARACTERIZATION DEPENDS ON D SCRIPT N SV HAS NO ROLE IN IT.

3RD BY SAYING RAJAT'S ACTING WAS AMAZING DURING SV'S DIRECTION...UR QUESTIONING HIS TALENT N CALIBER TOO.

4TH SV'S CHARACTER IS LYK THAT.. HIS CHARACTER DIDN'T CHANGE SUDDENLY DURING JA...HE WAS LYK THAT ONLY..IT BECAME A NEWS ONLY DURING JA WHEN 90 MEMBERS WERE OUTSED N EK WAS QUESTIONED IN TIGER TRACK PROMOTIONS..IT BECAME A NEWS..OTHERWISE EVN THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN UNDER WRAPS.

5TH HIS PROBLM IS NOT ONLY ANGER MANAGEMENT BUT SOMETHING MORE THN THAT.. HE HAS SUPERIORITY COMPLEX.

AFTR ALL THIS PLS TELL ME WHO IS UNPROFESSIONAL...IS IT PARIDHI OR SV?

How aptly written jojaparijath!. a common viewer who is not an intellect & intelligent in analyzing tv shows and industry like me also could understand easily all the points u mentioned -- how a show becomes popular nd successful!!!!!.
in fact i feel santu's suppressed feelings over something might have turned him into a sadist.

i too worked with oracle corp on people soft platform in U.S after my M.S directly from u.s university but our boss always used to coordinate with all employees of our team(a Big tem) experienced as well as freshers like me and , people from different countries in the team nd the output he used to get our of is remarkable. we never felt stressed under that boss. he never showed his supremacy. He never showed disparity between freshers and experienced.

A director who is supposed to be like a leader having so short temper nd culturless brute like using abusive language what type of director he is?whether an actor is senior or junior he has to treat them first properly. guide them patiently even if they r not very talented actors. with highly talented actors what is his greatness to direct???
Even for JA what he did in direction all the script ,cvs who left because him nd actors did it to bring name to him.

Ekta as she is producing somany shows at a time she might have retained him for some episodes thinking tht known devil is better . any way she never continued some director through out the show.

i don't understand why he is thrown out of etr-2 after some episodes nd another director was brought in?

why Ekta never continued him for all episodes in any of her shows?

This man needs perfection first in man management nd he is not a superb director as per many nd i can point out a lot many faults in his direction. he needs immediately counseling nd needs to sit at home for some years to prevent further damage to the industry.

Rajath worked with many other directors too from his childhood nd earned name. he is not because of santu sadist became popular. for some more months if rt had worked with santu he too might have become a sick actor like some others.

why JA was a success initially was not because of santu nd even 10% credit doesn't go to him.

I think along with him if anybody is supporting him even after these incidents (CINTA chairman also feeling he is wrong in his behaviour) they also shd visit nd get treated by a psychiatrist for mental well being.