Need better story - Page 2

Originally posted by: myviewprem

yup I feel sad Jeannie that a historical which had so much scope is going down the dumps

just watch siyasaat the salim nur jahaan romance just the effort they take to eye lock hiding from world looks so believable of that 16th century

here lovers only fight like some street fight first Jodha with her ghrina now anarkali with her nafrat uff where is decent love scenes

That's what happens when the head chef cooks something with lots of love but then leaves the pot simmering and under the eyes of the cleaners instead of sous chefs. I know weird example but that's what happens with all EK shows. She comes up with good shows & great concepts and calls them her babies and then after 6months runs off creating new shows for other channels. This female has the most neglected soap babies in this world. Aur abhi to her other show is doing well enough on zee, another show is doing good on SP and another show is doing okay on colors, to what does she care about JA, in June 2years will be completed and after 45 or so epis 500 epis will be done... thoda effort daalke she will end it this year bcoz of the stupid leap bacha kya hai dikhane 😡

Actually I started watching JA for MUZ/Akbar, their love story, their history pulls me in & well also for Rajat... not really bothered about Salim's love story which again seems like more NR but maybe with the royal aura 😆 EK show Prem... hate turns to love turns to Brahmacharya is the way it goes 😆

i think right now they are writing the script after being drunk

why siyasat comes in many post of JA forum.. siyasat fans must commnt on siyasat forum, dis forum is all abt JA I thnk.

prem royal aura must needed in a historical shw bt I thnk 1 of the reason JA is the most hit historical shw among all in dis genera, coz its sumhw lacks formalities decorum,, normal common viewers can feel attachd wid ths easy go chrctrs. I personally wouldn't lyk if they shw soo much formal mationary chrcterisation,, dis shw is fr common people entertainment, nt only fr history genius,, evn fr those who don't knw a bit of history. decorum, formality can hindrence common man language. bt yah I too feel sum tyms dey go far a bit,, cvs must pay attetion sum tym.

Originally posted by: myviewprem

yes but atleast ela there dignity of a emperor and prince is maintained

salim is not threatening Akbar of a war or lusting after women

ruqaiah is not shouting and screeching at Akbar

Akbar is head of family who makes all decisions and all follow it whether they like it or not even a salim

here salim hates Akbar and Jodha so much from childhood hard to digest

and Jodha used to have least scant respect for Akbar or his position and now anarkali has least scant respect for a prince is that believable?

and why all love story should start with an hate so many books/movies are there on this love story where was hate ever there bet salim anarkali? Was it not love at first sight case even if its a folklore and fiction

Very valid points,even in 21 century nothing of this sorts happen ,imagine akbar the great doing arti and sending his begum to do social work,son hating parents ,even rich and famouse people do social work trough ngo,not going to street or living among people,and that was mughal sultanat,one of the richest na,rest in peace ja

Originally posted by: ghalibmirza

sara today's ruqlal scene was good and both the actors compliment each other in terms of acting! paridhi is great in emotional scenes but scenes that need some feelings of deep love emoted in action she lacks in those scenes hence the closeness of akhda lacks something!

I'm sorry but I don't agree with you. Paridhi has fantastic chemistry with rajat n that is one of the primary reasons the show was a success in the first place. Rukaiya ! There was nothing except plotting going on in rukaiya mind when she came with jalal. N even as per story jalal knows she loves her power more than she loves him. Closeness of Akdha is what has brought fans from over the world to see the show. N let's face the fact no one Wants to see a documentary of akbar. N even if the show does show some of jodha achievements it does not undermine akbars achievements in any way nor does it make him look less great. When one falls the other helps that's how love is. Akbar was no superman that he did all by himself. He achieved it with support. Political matters with help of his navratnas n religious tolerance n change in nature cause of jodha. Remember bairam Khan n maham hated Hindus n they were treated poorly during that era. A postive influence is a must n jodha was that influence. Akbar was not great from day one. He realised mistakes n became great. So jodha has a lot of achievements n credits to her name. So why do people think that jodha doing any political work will undermine akbar achievement. N about rukaiya. She has not loved jalal only her power. She wanted to maintain control over jalal n that's why she hates jodha cause jodha took jalal's heart. Jalal always wanted a wife who cared fr him not his position. Even before jalal married jodha he had asked rukaiya whether she gets jealous of he goes to another wife. Rukaiya clearly said she did not bother. Jalal found that love in jodha. N secondly no one drugs a child of someone you supposedly love. So rukaiya n jalal have nothing as per the show. N for the real rukaiya in akbarnama only the marriage with jodha has been discussed over chapters n ruk is just mentioned in a line. Plus in din e ilahi akbar was not in favour of marriage with cousins. Who would he do that if rukaiya was his love? N talking about Khurram. Why did jalal not give his own kids to ruk ? He did it cause it was her who was without a child and she was his freind from childhood. But giving children to raise was a custom n no way it proves that the real ruk was the love of jalal . Siyaasat is about noorjahan n as you know that book is fictional. This is a drama n some NR is believable n needed. Agree some have been too much. But you can't have a documentary. Like insects could b used to signify things. It's a show fr entertainment also n some symbolism is ok. U don't need to relate everything to history all the time. Every little thing. Salim anarkali had ruined the show. Makers have realised that people want to see jodha Akbar n so have brought the change.

Originally posted by: karishma.s

I'm sorry but I don't agree with you. Paridhi has fantastic chemistry with rajat n that is one of the primary reasons the show was a success in the first place. Rukaiya ! There was nothing except plotting going on in rukaiya mind when she came with jalal. N even as per story jalal knows she loves her power more than she loves him. Closeness of Akdha is what has brought fans from over the world to see the show. N let's face the fact no one Wants to see a documentary of akbar. N even if the show does show some of jodha achievements it does not undermine akbars achievements in any way nor does it make him look less great. When one falls the other helps that's how love is. Akbar was no superman that he did all by himself. He achieved it with support. Political matters with help of his navratnas n religious tolerance n change in nature cause of jodha. Remember bairam Khan n maham hated Hindus n they were treated poorly during that era. A postive influence is a must n jodha was that influence. Akbar was not great from day one. He realised mistakes n became great. So jodha has a lot of achievements n credits to her name. So why do people think that jodha doing any political work will undermine akbar achievement. N about rukaiya. She has not loved jalal only her power. She wanted to maintain control over jalal n that's why she hates jodha cause jodha took jalal's heart. Jalal always wanted a wife who cared fr him not his position. Even before jalal married jodha he had asked rukaiya whether she gets jealous of he goes to another wife. Rukaiya clearly said she did not bother. Jalal found that love in jodha. N secondly no one drugs a child of someone you supposedly love. So rukaiya n jalal have nothing as per the show. N for the real rukaiya in akbarnama only the marriage with jodha has been discussed over chapters n ruk is just mentioned in a line. Plus in din e ilahi akbar was not in favour of marriage with cousins. Who would he do that if rukaiya was his love? N talking about Khurram. Why did jalal not give his own kids to ruk ? He did it cause it was her who was without a child and she was his freind from childhood. But giving children to raise was a custom n no way it proves that the real ruk was the love of jalal . Siyaasat is about noorjahan n as you know that book is fictional. This is a drama n some NR is believable n needed. Agree some have been too much. But you can't have a documentary. Like insects could b used to signify things. It's a show fr entertainment also n some symbolism is ok. U don't need to relate everything to history all the time. Every little thing. Salim anarkali had ruined the show. Makers have realised that people want to see jodha Akbar n so have brought the change.

COMPLETELY AGREE WITH U N WELL WRITTEN

Originally posted by: myviewprem

yes but atleast ela there dignity of a emperor and prince is maintained

salim is not threatening Akbar of a war or lusting after women

ruqaiah is not shouting and screeching at Akbar

Akbar is head of family who makes all decisions and all follow it whether they like it or not even a salim

here salim hates Akbar and Jodha so much from childhood hard to digest

and Jodha used to have least scant respect for Akbar or his position and now anarkali has least scant respect for a prince is that believable?

and why all love story should start with an hate so many books/movies are there on this love story where was hate ever there bet salim anarkali? Was it not love at first sight case even if its a folklore and fiction

ela, siyaasat is not a complete fiction..after reading books on akbar i have realized how much truth they have shown and in the best possible way presentation wise...and yes it does have fiction too..on the other hand JA too has some historical facts but the problem is in the way its being presented..Akbar if you read about him had a larger than life persona and no tom dick and harry could make a noise in front of him let alone insulting him and in the show a keeda too doesn't care about the emperor😆..ab aisi presentation pe kya trp increase hogi..ekta thinks she will please the masses with her cliched low budgeted bakwaas but even the masses have a choice if they find something more entertaining they will switch the channel and think oh god same old crap being shown again..if ekta wants trp then she has to give a dhamaakedaar promo and some major twist that can pop the eyes and not some repetitive tracks which the audience have already seen..right now entertainment is missing..it looks repetitive and boring..akbar is unrecognizable..the basic royal aura that was the usp of the show is missing..the sets look cheap and the script direction everything is shaky..no consistency in characterization..instead of smooth transition in story abrupt changes are being made which is confusing the viewers!

Prem, JA by EK has nothing to do with history and the Emperor Akbar, the Emperor of Hindustan - this is a Hatim Tai and Lal Pari ishtory with names borrowed from history - toh aise mei aisi betuki sub plots hi milengi.