Murad to enter in JA as salima son - Page 9

Originally posted by: history_geek

1. There is a difference between the so-called Historians and researchers. Historian ONLY reads and writes. Researchers tries to verify a fact from many sources. A historian knows about a lot of things about various events, but a researcher SPECIALIZES only in a few topics, but he/she may know about that SINGLE topic more than the historian. As we say, "Jack of all trades, master of none".. I would mention Dirk Collier here. :)

2. And as i know something, so let me write it here. Dirk Collier is a Belgium historian cum researcher who spoke with GreaT Authority , after spending 7 years of his life researching ONLY on Akbar in India.. He OPENLY said in a press conference in 2011, that Salima was respected by Akbar and she was CHILDLESS. This video can be located in the National Archives.

3. His PRICELESS research of those 7 years{2003 to 2010-11} can be found in the National Archives of India / The National Museum, at New Delhi. To access it, one needs to register him/herself with them. The service is paid... He also got some Imperial Documents about Akbar and MUZ's trade talks as well during his research which i mentioned in my posts... :)

Yes Akbar was not a one man women, we all know it, BUT Salima did not have Murad as a son with Akbar...

I don't know what the CV's are upto now. Neither they have shown the daughter Fatima, nor they have shown the Fatehpur Sikri and Ajmer trips of JJ, and now this NONSENSICAL stunt of CV's..!!. They themselves said last year in VO that Akbar married Salima ONLY for giving him safety.?. And now they are going totally opposite..!!!.

Originally posted by: history_geek

1. There is a difference between the so-called Historians and researchers. Historian ONLY reads and writes. Researchers tries to verify a fact from many sources. A historian knows about a lot of things about various events, but a researcher SPECIALIZES only in a few topics, but he/she may know about that SINGLE topic more than the historian. As we say, "Jack of all trades, master of none".. I would mention Dirk Collier here. :)

2. And as i know something, so let me write it here. Dirk Collier is a Belgium historian cum researcher who spoke with GreaT Authority , after spending 7 years of his life researching ONLY on Akbar in India.. He OPENLY said in a press conference in 2011, that Salima was respected by Akbar and she was CHILDLESS. This video can be located in the National Archives.

3. His PRICELESS research of those 7 years{2003 to 2010-11} can be found in the National Archives of India / The National Museum, at New Delhi. To access it, one needs to register him/herself with them. The service is paid... He also got some Imperial Documents about Akbar and MUZ's trade talks as well during his research which i mentioned in my posts... :)

Yes Akbar was not a one man women, we all know it, BUT Salima did not have Murad as a son with Akbar...

I don't know what the CV's are upto now. Neither they have shown the daughter Fatima, nor they have shown the Fatehpur Sikri and Ajmer trips of JJ, and now this NONSENSICAL stunt of CV's..!!. They themselves said last year in VO that Akbar married Salima ONLY for giving him safety.?. And now they are going totally opposite..!!!.

Originally posted by: Birdiee

It's like MUZ gave him some kind of vigra pill to Akbar and his wives b/c they started shooting kids out like some rockets. Besides there was a strong held belief that a woman who had given just birth would be very fertile so something in tells me Murad was her son. Her being the mother with a timeframe can fit in.

Originally posted by: history_geek

1. There is a difference between the so-called Historians and researchers. Historian ONLY reads and writes. Researchers tries to verify a fact from many sources. A historian knows about a lot of things about various events, but a researcher SPECIALIZES only in a few topics, but he/she may know about that SINGLE topic more than the historian. As we say, "Jack of all trades, master of none".. I would mention Dirk Collier here. :)

2. And as i know something, so let me write it here. Dirk Collier is a Belgium historian cum researcher who spoke with GreaT Authority , after spending 7 years of his life researching ONLY on Akbar in India.. He OPENLY said in a press conference in 2011, that Salima was respected by Akbar and she was CHILDLESS. This video can be located in the National Archives.

3. His PRICELESS research of those 7 years{2003 to 2010-11} can be found in the National Archives of India / The National Museum, at New Delhi. To access it, one needs to register him/herself with them. The service is paid... He also got some Imperial Documents about Akbar and MUZ's trade talks as well during his research which i mentioned in my posts... :)

Yes Akbar was not a one man women, we all know it, BUT Salima did not have Murad as a son with Akbar...

I don't know what the CV's are upto now. Neither they have shown the daughter Fatima, nor they have shown the Fatehpur Sikri and Ajmer trips of JJ, and now this NONSENSICAL stunt of CV's..!!. They themselves said last year in VO that Akbar married Salima ONLY for giving him safety.?. And now they are going totally opposite..!!!.

Originally posted by: aashyagh

But where is it saying that they aer showing Murad as salima's son?