Zeenat is not going any where - Page 36

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

She doesn't have a right Ela but had Rahim died due to Shehnaaz, would you called Jo a killer for bringing Shehnaaz into the palace? If Jodha is not responsible for the mishaps by Shehnaaz then how is Ruqaiya responsible for the twins death for engaging Zeenat that too when Zeenat entered the palace only in the capacity of a guest and stayed as a guest. Her appointment as a dai was incidental.

Originally posted by: adiana12

Ela, its going to go the way I predicted - Monday Zeenat will poison Hussein - Tuesday Hussein will die - Wednesday Ruqs will ask for justice - Thursday Zeenat and Qasim get caught - and Friday Ruqs gets an earful from Akbar - and No Ela, Akbar will not be confused about Jodha, instead he would be wanting some clue that could prove that the deaths were not due to some stupid curse or negligence or any such thing - and this track will be over the same way as Atifa track was, in a jiffy - and the Diwali week will see Ruqs being relegated to the periphery and a leap to Salim's birth - Srry my dear but na toh Ruqs ka koi bada sa bhandaphod ya punishment hoga na hi koi seperation track of Akbar and Jodha hoga 😛

Originally posted by: vinitaj27

I agree with u that ruqqaiya s responsible for a lot of pain but not Hassan's death n that will be the reason y she would not be killed in case if there is some bhandaphod of any kind. But now we have to see how Hussein is killed coz the reason zeenat has got this close to jodha's room is thanx to her appointment as a caretaker by ruqqaiya. As just a guest she would not be entering jodha's room or spending time there without raising suspicion. It's the distrust of ruqqaiya on jodha that has allowed zeenat to be close to Hussein so yes if zeenat manages to kill Hussein now then ruqqaiya is indirectly responsible for his death.

Zeenat is bhabhi jaan of Jalal shd she would have access to everywhere to the palace. If she wants to kill Hussein when with Jo, she would have stuck to Jo praising her mixing with the Mughals so well and clung to her and sought a chance to carry out her evil intentions. IF Mirza Hakim has access to all rooms of the palace, then Zeenat too would. Again, if Rahim had died due to Shehnaaz then is Jo indirectly responsible for his death? Is Jodha responsible for all the deaths of soldiers killed by Khaiber. NO. Just the same Ruqs too isn't. She did not know what Zeenat was.

Shenaz dint hv intention to kill rahim... I stil believe that while playing with rahim he accidentally has fallen and shenaz to make believ evryone that she is mentally disabled she strtd laughing... If she really wanted to kill rahim she wud not Hv thrown rahim from horse before leaving fort... She wud Hv taken him along with her n kill him n throw him outside fort... Mahamanga also bought benazir not knwing abt ben intentions and jo bought shenaz but nothing happend to jalal or his close ones bcz of them wen they stayed in mahal... But here bcz of zeenat who was bought by ruk as Dai ma two kids were killed unlike previous times which were all failure...

Originally posted by: elasingh

OK Adi but plz tell me why should Ruku ask for justice? What right she has to ask for it? what do you mean by it?

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Zeenat is bhabhi jaan of Jalal shd she would have access to everywhere to the palace. If she wants to kill Hussein when with Jo, she would have stuck to Jo praising her mixing with the Mughals so well and clung to her and sought a chance to carry out her evil intentions. IF Mirza Hakim has access to all rooms of the palace, then Zeenat too would. Again, if Rahim had died due to Shehnaaz then is Jo indirectly responsible for his death? Is Jodha responsible for all the deaths of soldiers killed by Khaiber. NO. Just the same Ruqs too isn't. She did not know what Zeenat was.

Originally posted by: Akdhaparijatluv

Shenaz dint hv intention to kill rahim... I stil believe that while playing with rahim he accidentally has fallen and shenaz to make believ evryone that she is mentally disabled she strtd laughing... If she really wanted to kill rahim she wud not Hv thrown rahim from horse before leaving fort... She wud Hv taken him along with her n kill him n throw him outside fort... Mahamanga also bought benazir not knwing abt ben intentions and jo bought shenaz but nothing happend to jalal or his close ones bcz of them wen they stayed in mahal... But here bcz of zeenat who was bought by ruk as Dai ma two kids were killed unlike previous times which were all failure...

Mirchi war happened due to Shenhaaz. The harem had to be shifted only because Shehnaaz learnt of the passageways of the harem and it was unsafe to leave them there.

Originally posted by: elasingh

bhavana I cant say anything...if kids could not resist to poison due to premature death ? I have no idea of it...but I will say one thing if kids death was to be shown as due to poison then why give so much weightage to MA's curse?...Kids are not dying due to curse but due to poison which is man made...

Yes Ela kids died bcz of poison not bcz of curse... And immediate death is bcz of these r prematured kids

Originally posted by: vinitaj27

Still after the death of Hassan she would never have been left alone with Hussein if not for her position as his milk mother. As a guest she would have to follow certain limits n not enter jodha's room without an excuse everytime. Even Mirza hakim doesn't enter Jalal room.

Then she would have dressed like a baandhi like last time, created a diversion and finished off her task. She is not a mere guest but a family member. Her access to palace rooms is not so difficult afterall.

Originally posted by: divyavm

The point is when do we start the blame game .., why did Ruqs end up getting Hussein in the first place?

Jalal had put his foot down it will not happen ... Jodha insisted otherwise

The farmaan didn't say she would get the child only if she loved it and did not want it for some title ... The farmaan is the farmaan and all parties agreed to it

There was a story I heard once- one man was sent to get medicines in an urgency and an ambulance was also going urgently and they collide

Who is to blame? It is tough. Do we blame the ambulance driver or why he is a rush, do you blame the man walking or who sent him to get the medicine - the chain will go back and back ...

But in no way Am I saying Ruqs is a good person for doing any of this ... But you cannot blame her for the death ...