Who has gained and who has lost? - Page 7

Originally posted by: rima4ever

she wants to use the baby for a title
but if she does not harm the baby intentionally
she technically is not that wrong may be
her intention to hire zeenat was good as u said

Originally posted by: divyavm

But Jodha believed Ruq's sadness at being childless and she could not see Jalal break her promise

I would not have done what Jodha did ... but I see where Jodha is coming from

Originally posted by: ..Anusha..

Is everybody sad today? Ruks fans and then everybody else. 😆

Nobody is happy today

and Magal you have to do double duty comforting both. So many twins analogies here. Are you rocking two cradles at the same time.

Chitti ... you know me so well 🤗


By the way Sandhya nailed the perfect song for this situation between Jodha and Jalal- Nilave Mugam Kaatu from Ejamaan ... Rajni was awesome in that movie: https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/jodha-akbar/4188905/who-has-gained-and-who-has-lost?pn=6

Originally posted by: rima4ever

thats what i said
she did what she felt was good at that point
now she is getting the karma phal
i mean the fruit of her karma
there is a proverb in bengali
wise people learn after hearing and seeing
foolish people learn after learning it the hard way

Originally posted by: divyavm

But is separating a newborn from her mother ... harming?

There lies the million dollar questio n

Originally posted by: divyavm

Ya ... but she gave the child in a world where she assumed that she would have one child

Who would have known she would lose her child?

Originally posted by: rima4ever

it is a question in a loop
if separating a mother from a baby is a sin / crime
then both jo and ruq are guilty in different aspects

Originally posted by: rima4ever

see why do u do insurance
because calamities can come anytime na
accidents mishaps happen anytime
u cannot just assume all will be ok always