Jodha Akbar 210: Shakespearian heights DT 50 - Page 2

Originally posted by: RTPSFanatic

👏

Originally posted by: sashashyam

As usual, Adiana, I agree with you completely. If I had been Jalal, I would never have felt the same towards Jodha again. There would have been a crack in the glass that could never have been repaired.

But neither the CVs nor the bulk of the audience would have room for these subtleties, nor the sensitivity to understand them. So you and I and all those of like mind will have to mull over this matter, and others like, it on our own.

Shyamaal

Originally posted by: aashyagh

Unres

Your post completed RT's performance, it is splendid👏

Jodha didn't have to utter why Sujamal was in harem, even if she had told Jalal that it was her bhaisa, Jalal wouldn't have been shattered, at that point of time, for him it only mattered who was that man, and Sujamal had asked her not to mention about their meetings, he didn't ask to hide his identity? As Jodha was surprised, when Jalal accused her of adultery and asked who was that man?

For me, as I said in my earlier post, nothing can justify jodha's silence, many questioned in the forum, how can you choose between your brother and husband, ( I have a brother and ofcourse I understand, both relation holds it's separate importance). but here it was definitely not an option, by her truth, her husband can be saved by the pain he has to suffer for lifetime and her brother' slice would be saved+ her honour would be intact. And for a Rajvanshi women it does matter and is it right by her dharma, to make your husband suffer lifelong? Which vachan tells you to do that?

Jalal made me cry yesterday. He was so helpless in her love, all he wanted to know was, if Jodha loves another man, even if Jodha had told, no shehensha "hum apse prem karte hain", Jalal would have let go everything.

Originally posted by: adianasr

The only way I see here is the total and abject surrender from Jodha that may actually go in healing this particular wound and it will take years - and perhaps something like this must have happened in their lives becoz Jodha never ever left Akbar's corner even for her children - infact it is recorded that she was also his travel companion even during the wars after 1575 that he fought personally and in all his travels across the Sultanate even before that. She must have put him above everyone, including her children and that cannot have happened just like that - All I can say is that the real Queen was lucky to get such a man who was capable of living his life so totally and completely - and yes Akbar would also be called lucky if she reciprocated in the same manner.

Originally posted by: divyavm

Loved every inch of his post Shyamala Aunty! Thank you so much for writing it.

You captured every emotion of Rajat/Jalal in that scene, My favorite was when first he said that my heart is not willing to distrust you ... Please tell me who he is! Even in all this pain... His heart was telling him to still trust her.

I was shocked more than anything by Jodha's silence especially when the purpose of the vachan was rendered useless. For a second, I was wondering, why / to who is Jalal pouring his heart?

My biggest hurt was when she answered "yes" to the "do you love him" question

- First, he obviously mentioned a different mohabbhat ... Things are not so black and white in life

- Second, even if she thinks she has mohabhat for Sujamal, if she can lie to Jalal for a vachan to her brother, can she not "lie" to save her husband from self-destructing

I know you don't like blaming the CVs- but the only logic in Jodha's behavior and the vachan was dragging the actual MU. Jodha was more responsive when he accused her for Ruqs' MC.

Thanks Aunty- hope another miracle comes soon that you are forced to post again 😊