..::Doubts & Discussions about Historical facts::.. - Page 108

kaash we had time machine yaar. i feel it is really necessary

Lol...you girls are rocking...😆⭐️

As i said Akbar marrying even after his marriage to Jodha does not set the criteria to call JA's love story fake or call him Akbar a womanizer..If having many begums is d criteria to call a man a womanizer,then all kings/men in that era were a womanizer.

As a Rajput princess ,Jodha has been taught from childhood that King has d r8 to marry n have many wives..so there is no question of her stopping Akbar.

About Akbar marrying so many even after his marriage to Jodha,then most of them were political alliance n many among them Rajput princess itself so that he could have Rajputana under him through friendly alliance then going for a blood bath.

U r saying Sahjahan did not marry anyone after Mumtaaz..But i have heard stories of him having a eye on his wives sister ..Another thing is not marrying anyone after mumtaaz d only criteria to decide he is a 1 man women?..How sure r u that he was not physical with other bwgums,concubines or any other women.

Now about Salim,he not only loved Nurjahan but all of the women coming on his way during different stages of life..He fell for Maan bai,Jagat n many others ..He constructed so many monuments for each one of them.
Noorjahan came into his life very much later in his life not when he was young..He already has done everything he could by then so of him not marrying after Noorjahan does not make any difference..He was already under the influence of alchol/drugs so not in his full senses & Noorjahan was a shrewd lady,she made him a puppet.

A man forcefully having a women by killing his husband & a women who made his husband a puppet for her personal gains can not be termed as Two people greatly in love. 😆

Rest i have already made a comment above on Love in polygamy!

Originally posted by: sujaatha

yes what your saying is right. Dont get carried away by media read ancient books to know the truth and facts instead of fighting with people who try to give facts. Media is only a tool for us to go and look back at the real history if we give history as it is in media people may not look at it so fiction is added but please the real history is still there. So please go back and read ancient real books not whats there is internet and argue and waste time . I also visited real pens blog he/she has told some facts. Why not reserach on it instead of fighting.

I hope u understand the difference between a fight & debate..In that case u r trying to fight & forcing ur point on others..I m talking about historian/reasearchers & ur talking about media. 😆

Originally posted by: jojaparijat

As i said Akbar marrying even after his marriage to Jodha does not set the criteria to call JA's love story fake or call him Akbar a womanizer..If having many begums is d criteria to call a man a womanizer,then all kings/men in that era were a womanizer.

As a Rajput princess ,Jodha has been taught from childhood that King has d r8 to marry n have many wives..so there is no question of her stopping Akbar.

About Akbar marrying so many even after his marriage to Jodha,then most of them were political alliance n many among them Rajput princess itself so that he could have Rajputana under him through friendly alliance then going for a blood bath.

U r saying Sahjahan did not marry anyone after Mumtaaz..But i have heard stories of him having a eye on his wives sister ..Another thing is not marrying anyone after mumtaaz d only criteria to decide he is a 1 man women?..How sure r u that he was not physical with other bwgums,concubines or any other women.

Now about Salim,he not only loved Nurjahan but all of the women coming on his way during different stages of life..He fell for Maan bai,Jagat n many others ..He constructed so many monuments for each one of them.
Noorjahan came into his life very much later in his life not when he was young..He already has done everything he could by then so of him not marrying after Noorjahan does not make any difference..He was already under the influence of alchol/drugs so not in his full senses & Noorjahan was a shrewd lady,she made him a puppet.

A man forcefully having a women by killing his husband & a women who made his husband a puppet for her personal gains can not be termed as Two people greatly in love. 😆

Rest i have already made a comment above on Love in polygamy!

Just wnt to add reason of shahjanha's death which i heard in discovery channel's documentary on Taj Mahal is over consumption of Viagra so as TM of this thread has more believe in media,blogs n article so wht this info by discovery make shahjanha great true lover of mumtaz or womanizer till his last breath...
P.S. like jodha akbar i believe in shahjanha mumtaz n other story of that era on the basis of authentic books i read nt wht is media said or wht info some blog or article gv...

Originally posted by: jiya.k

Just wnt to add reason of shahjanha's death which i heard in discovery channel's documentary on Taj Mahal is over consumption of Viagra so as TM of this thread has more believe in media,blogs n article so wht this info by discovery make shahjanha great true lover of mumtaz or womanizer till his last breath...
P.S. like jodha akbar i believe in shahjanha mumtaz n other story of that era on the basis of authentic books i read nt wht is media said or wht info some blog or article gv...

Originally posted by: harshu27

ppl get carried away for shahjahan mumtaz's love jst coz of d taj mahal but i feel he waited for her to die to proclaim his love by building taj mahal whereas JA silently made a love story without any materialistic approach...der was purely spiritual...😳

Originally posted by: -AkDha.Lover-

Exactly di... I believe the same. If ShahJahan gave his wife a beautiful mausoleum, Akbar gave his Mariam-Uz-Zamani a beautiful life! ❤️ And that's what makes all the difference...😳

^^^ Yup true di...and that is why I so love this story. This is the perfect love story! ❤️

Originally posted by: jojaparijat

I hope u understand the difference between a fight & debate..In that case u r trying to fight & forcing ur point on others..I m talking about historian/reasearchers & ur talking about media. 😆