Is Ekta really Right?

Hey All

I know protestors are wrong for protesting just for a show when they have so many other issues to protest about but are thy wrong?

Isn't this assasinating Akbar's character and History?
Are all viewers of JA mature enough to differentiate what is reality and what is fiction being shown?

Just for sake of increasing activity!

P.S: follow my signature and join JA forum!

Kind Regards,
Alina.

Originally posted by: I-Luv-Rashi

Hey All

I know protestors are wrong for protesting just for a show when they have so many other issues to protest about but are thy wrong?

Isn't this assasinating Akbar's character and History?
Are all viewers of JA mature enough to differentiate what is reality and what is fiction being shown?

Just for sake of increasing activity!

P.S: follow my signature and join JA forum!

Kind Regards,
Alina.

no. as far as , i have read, till the time Akbar was under influence of Bairam khan and MA he was cruel, ruthless, the way it's shown in JA. (not 100% but mostly). later when they were nomore with him he became independent , and then it was the way he changed to become Akbar the Great.

of course, it's what i have read. there can be other views also.

right now i m reading 'Samrat Akbar' in marathi. according to author it's based on both 'Akbarnama' and a book from famous writer in Akbar's era 'Badayuni'. and Badayuni is said to be against Akbar. coz Akbar started his own religion later.

Originally posted by: sweet_diksha

no. as far as , i have read, till the time Akbar was under influence of Bairam khan and MA he was cruel, ruthless, the way it's shown in JA. (not 100% but mostly). later when they were nomore with him he became independent , and then it was the way he changed to become Akbar the Great.

of course, it's what i have read. there can be other views also.

right now i m reading 'Samrat Akbar' in marathi. according to author it's based on both 'Akbarnama' and a book from famous writer in Akbar's era 'Badayuni'. and Badayuni is said to be against Akbar. coz Akbar started his own religion later.

Thanks for knowledge Dearo!

nope...Akbar was far more crueller than what is being shown actually. Ekta is not even showing 30% of his brutality...he changed eventually...but he was a very ruthless, cruel emperor at the beginning.

Originally posted by: I-Luv-Rashi

Hey All

I know protestors are wrong for protesting just for a show when they have so many other issues to protest about but are thy wrong?

Isn't this assasinating Akbar's character and History?
Are all viewers of JA mature enough to differentiate what is reality and what is fiction being shown?

Just for sake of increasing activity!

P.S: follow my signature and join JA forum!

Kind Regards,
Alina.