remo gvs 9 to shakti

Remo gvs 9 to both palak and shakti...for him both were of equal standard...ridiculous judging...I understand not gving 10 to shakti...because remo wants her to work doubly harder and gv even more brilliant perf...but same marks to palak...that is totally unjust 😡 😡

I agree.

i slightly disagree...in jhalak...competition is with themselves nd nt others...dusro se hoga to shaks will win with ease...its about how u improve urself

They see the growth of individual dancers dear , so never compare two actors , if you do you will never find justice. They judge based on their growth ONLY

Originally posted by: akankshaArsha

i slightly disagree...in jhalak...competition is with themselves nd nt others...dusro se hoga to shaks will win with ease...its about how u improve urself

Originally posted by: akankshaArsha

i slightly disagree...in jhalak...competition is with themselves nd nt others...dusro se hoga to shaks will win with ease...its about how u improve urself

Agreed Shakti ka was understandable but palak??

Originally posted by: akankshaArsha

i slightly disagree...in jhalak...competition is with themselves nd nt others...dusro se hoga to shaks will win with ease...its about how u improve urself

i dont understand...of course competition is between the contestants...thatz y one person will get the trophy...and thatz y each week one will get eliminated...

as a viewer shakti's dance gv me sheer pleasure and palak irritated the hell out of me...but watching them getting same marks that too from someone who himself is a choreographer...i cant accept that...

i totally agree palak is an entertainer (although he failed to entertain me in any way but for other's sake i am ready to accept palak as a great entertainer)...but then either gv marks for silly antics and gv 10 to palak and 5 to shakti or else gv marks for dance and gv 10/9 to shakti and 5 to palak...

i mean each act has its own essence...dancing, acting, singing, painting and comedy...everything has its own place...palak is a comedian so she is popular in comedy shows...but here she has to be judged for her dancing skills and should be marked accordingly...
but even then if only her entertainment factor has to be judged then she shudnt hv been invited in this show...for that there is eklkbk...

Originally posted by: -Blind.Dance-

They see the growth of individual dancers dear , so never compare two actors , if you do you will never find justice. They judge based on their growth ONLY

if that is so then wat growth was there in their very first performance...wat did the judges compare...growth means doing better than prev perf...
and if growth is all that matters then palak may end up getting the trophy...because obviously the worst dancer will learn the most in 3 months while an already established dancer like shakti's growth graph cannot be as much as palak...

like u know 0 to 100 is a greater leap than 90 to 100...