Popularity Plus Partiality = J DJ & Ekta - Page 2

Meena

You have so aptly put forth the wildcard scenario in a very adult intellectual and mainly OBJECTIVE way. Now if only the "junior" members would understand instead of resorting to mud-slinging!!!

Go Meena!! You've said everything that needed to be said. Everyone is getting so hyped up over the whole wildcard fact and how it's so unfair, but when you think about it, JDJ isn't fair either....

i think Prachi didnot deserve to be out in the first place but its not her fault that sony bought her back

Originally posted by: Chris.Khanna

Ummm did Sudha really really decline the offer cuz sony was asking us to vote for her and they even promoted her. 😕 i think her so called decline was just a comment she made on the concept of the wild card to an IF reporter BEFORE sony actually announced the wild card or even approached her so plz spare us the sermon of how sudhaji with all her maturity refused the offer. ppl need to stop assuming that sudha declined the wild card entry becuz she was being promoted by sony and ppl actually voted for her ME being one of them. so plz spare the personal judgements on dere individual and personal characters.. yes there public figures but that only gives us the right to judge & opine about their careers NOT their personal traits and judge what they think is dignified or not.

and itz not Sudhaji and prachi's problem that sony decided on the wildcard.

andddd plz don't start on wuts fair and not fair. is it fair that ronit roy exaggerated if not straight faced lied about his choeographers injury? is it fair that there are some contestants in the show who have already tried their hand at dancing. For example, Sandhya being a student of shaimak's school.

another thing, know that BBC owns the format of JDJ and not sony and lik someone else said bbc wud have to approve it.

First of all I am not holding Prachi responsible for her entry in The wild card round ...Kindly re read my Thread .. Secondly .. THANKS for voting for The dignified & mature Sudhaji ..even though you dont think of her as such I am not cohercing you to alter your honourable views ..and Pardon ME ..I DO , not because she is my Favourite or I am OH so dazzled by her .as though i am starstruck She is a Good Dancer and her Exit too was very shocking to The same Judges and Public .

As for Ronit.. I do believe his choreographers injuries were Over emphasized coz if she was so seriously injured that her parents were expressing their deep concern how come in a weeks time she was Dancing without those support bands that she wore earlier especially since she must have practiced on her calves all week long.😕personally i fail to comprehend the dramatics of the choreographer and the media .

As for Sandhya being Shiamaks student and how many classes she actually attended there .we dont know .Also Sonali and Prachi may have acquired some dancing skills somehwere we may not know of

Originally posted by: Je_aime

Oh another topic on fairness.

Lets just assess the fairness of each participant and the show:

Sony would not have approved for Nicole Performance had the injury not been very small. So her injury could not have been Severe. But what did she and her Mighty Fairness partner said on the show, they said it is severe, internal injury and internal bleeding in both legs. That is exaggeration and playing a small injury as something so big. That is fair isnt it?

About Sonali, the madam said she is also learning dance for the first time like others, but she has already learnt dance before and she is blatantly lying. Oh that is fair and okay?

About Sandhya, she is actually competing with non-dancers when she has learnt dance in Shaimak's school itself. Having danced before definitely gives edge over others who did not even try dancing before. She fights, cries and accuses the judges of not giving high marks untill the judges get her nothing less than 30. Instead of taking what the judges say and give, she has to make a huge cry about it and that is soooo fair, isnt?

On what basis is negi getting 30 week after week. Extraordinary performance or for his hardwork at this age. If it is about hardwork, then everyone is putting in their hardwork. That is so fair isnt it?

The format of the whole show is not even fair as they are not playing even with some non-dancers and some proffessional dancers.

See, nothing is so fair in this whole game. I absoutely agree to the fact that it is UNFAIR for the wildcard not to be introduced to ALL the elimated participants and the rules being changed suddenly. BUT how can you blame Prachi for it?

Everybody is saying that Prachi fans are bias, so be it and so are other people's fan.

Btw, Is Ekta soo big that she can influence BBC to change the format?

Firstly, can you even believe that Prachi got low votes. Even if it was Diwali while others got votes how is that even possible that PRachi did not. She even won an award for the best actress which happened recently and that award was based on voting. Ppl voted for her on that competiting with other fans but did not vote for her for JDJ. Ppl are making noice about her elimination but did not vote for her. Can you even believe this? Prachi was made a scapegoat in TRP game and she is the one is being blamed if audience want her back.

Since everyone is taking about fairness, fine be fair and fair for one and all. Tell me who has been oh so fair in this JDJ. Nor the Big B of small screen was oh so fair, nor the big screen actress was oh so fair, nor the judge's student was oh so fair. But nobody blames them but everyone has to jump on Prachi when she was not the one who decided on wildcard round. Her ouster did bring the issue of wildcard but SHE DID NOT decide and dictated SOny to have one.

Btw,how do you know that Sudhaji did not participate in WC. If she did not participate, how could Sony be asking for votes for her? Wouldnt she have come up to the media and declined that she is not taking part in WC if she is not?

Instead of seeing this as a post from Prachi's fan, see this in all fairness.

Cheers,
Meena

If i am not mistaken..i did read that Sony went ahead and altered the format of the show without contacting BBC..

😆 Ekta madame may not be big enough to influence BBC.she sure can nudge Sony Via Jeetendra.to cause a huge wave steer things around .

Correction ..I wasnt blaming Prachi.but SONY for being partial with Prachi's elmination ..She was Voted out and Thats the way it should have been Diwali or no Diwali ..What if Jai or Ronit were voted out in Prachi's place ..would the Diwali excuse be given and either would have been brought back via the wild card round ?? 😕

as for negi getting 30 .. well I think its a well desrved score .along with Sandhya ..

In the beginning prachi got high scores compared to Ronit and sandhya where i believed she didnt deserve,.i guess the judges know why they give the scors they give .

Originally posted by: *Eva*

I agree but Prachi deserved to come back!

so did Tapur ,Mini and Cyrus

Originally posted by: Je_aime

Oh another topic on fairness.

Lets just assess the fairness of each participant and the show:

Sony would not have approved for Nicole Performance had the injury not been very small. So her injury could not have been Severe. But what did she and her Mighty Fairness partner said on the show, they said it is severe, internal injury and internal bleeding in both legs. That is exaggeration and playing a small injury as something so big. That is fair isnt it?

About Sonali, the madam said she is also learning dance for the first time like others, but she has already learnt dance before and she is blatantly lying. Oh that is fair and okay?

About Sandhya, she is actually competing with non-dancers when she has learnt dance in Shaimak's school itself. Having danced before definitely gives edge over others who did not even try dancing before. She fights, cries and accuses the judges of not giving high marks untill the judges get her nothing less than 30. Instead of taking what the judges say and give, she has to make a huge cry about it and that is soooo fair, isnt?

On what basis is negi getting 30 week after week. Extraordinary performance or for his hardwork at this age. If it is about hardwork, then everyone is putting in their hardwork. That is so fair isnt it?

The format of the whole show is not even fair as they are not playing even with some non-dancers and some proffessional dancers.

See, nothing is so fair in this whole game. I absoutely agree to the fact that it is UNFAIR for the wildcard not to be introduced to ALL the elimated participants and the rules being changed suddenly. BUT how can you blame Prachi for it?

Everybody is saying that Prachi fans are bias, so be it and so are other people's fan.

Btw, Is Ekta soo big that she can influence BBC to change the format?

Firstly, can you even believe that Prachi got low votes. Even if it was Diwali while others got votes how is that even possible that PRachi did not. She even won an award for the best actress which happened recently and that award was based on voting. Ppl voted for her on that competiting with other fans but did not vote for her for JDJ. Ppl are making noice about her elimination but did not vote for her. Can you even believe this? Prachi was made a scapegoat in TRP game and she is the one is being blamed if audience want her back.

Since everyone is taking about fairness, fine be fair and fair for one and all. Tell me who has been oh so fair in this JDJ. Nor the Big B of small screen was oh so fair, nor the big screen actress was oh so fair, nor the judge's student was oh so fair. But nobody blames them but everyone has to jump on Prachi when she was not the one who decided on wildcard round. Her ouster did bring the issue of wildcard but SHE DID NOT decide and dictated SOny to have one.

Btw,how do you know that Sudhaji did not participate in WC. If she did not participate, how could Sony be asking for votes for her? Wouldnt she have come up to the media and declined that she is not taking part in WC if she is not?

Instead of seeing this as a post from Prachi's fan, see this in all fairness.

Cheers,
Meena

I agree on your every point😳

Originally posted by: klueless

If i am not mistaken..i did read that Sony went ahead and altered the format of the show without contacting BBC.. If I am not mistaken, I read a lot of reports on how Sony needs BBC approval before having wildcard round.

😆 Ekta madame may not be big enough to influence BBC.she sure can nudge Sony Via Jeetendra.to cause a huge wave steer things around .

Correction ..I wasnt blaming Prachi.but SONY for being partial with Prachi's elmination ..She was Voted out and Thats the way it should have been Diwali or no Diwali ..What if Jai or Ronit were voted out in Prachi's place ..would the Diwali excuse be given and either would have been brought back via the wild card round ?? 😕 How are you so sure that Ekta would not have fought for her favourite blue-eyed boy, Big B of small screen? How sure are you that Ekta would not have fought for her one another blue-eyed boy Jay? How sure are you dear. It did not happen so we all cant assume that the "rich mummy" Ekta would not have supported RR and Jay😉

as for negi getting 30 .. well I think its a well desrved score .along with Sandhya ..

In the beginning prachi got high scores compared to Ronit and sandhya where i believed she didnt deserve,.i guess the judges know why they give the scors they give . Sorry I did not even talk about Prachi getting low marks. She always got the marks she deserved and I have no problems with that.