Popularity Plus Partiality = J DJ & Ekta

Talk about breaking the concept of a show ... JDJ has done it ..and Unfairly ..

First of all Much Respect to Sudha Chandran For honourably declining the Wild card Nonsense ... Where everyone who was Voted out should have been given a chance to perform again and put on voting and Only PD and Sudha were given this oportunity???

If Folks didnt choose to Watch Balaji telefilms -Ladli bahu .., Ekta's blue eyed doll ..That's Their fault ..If they adored her so much they should have voted for her regardless of having watched her performance .?????

lets hope If Ronit or Jay, sandhya sonali, Negi are voted out They are voted back in by Wild card round .Fair for One fair For all ...

Thought Sony Television would be Fair and maintain the concept of the original Format of the Show .

klue dear i agree that it was unfair to only include sudhaji and prachi for WC entry, but dear sudhaji has accepted that offer and it was prachi who has won 😉 on the basis of number of votes.

i think that format of this show of sony is not right and some of the contestants are professional dancers and while others are new to this, so they shld have chosen the contestants on the basis either all nondancers or all dancers.

sandya is a product of shamak's own school so why she was allowed to compete with people new to dancing.

swati

Originally posted by: swatinarang

klue dear i agree that it was unfair to only include sudhaji and prachi for WC entry, but dear sudhaji has accepted that offer and it was prachi who has won 😉 on the basis of number of votes.

i think that format of this show of sony is not right and some of the contestants are professional dancers and while others are new to this, so they shld have chosen the contestants on the basis either all nondancers or all dancers.

sandya is a product of shamak's own school so why she was allowed to compete with people new to dancing.

swati

I agree That a few contestants know how to dance .Like Sudha ..? and Sandhya ..But Sandhaya isnt a complete profesional Like Nicole ,bindi the choreographers her first performance contained flaws..and Sudha is a Classical dancer .but with an artificial limb/leg she is impaired ..Jhalak's compttion isnt based on Classical dancing . Salsa, tango,jives etc are worlds apart compared to Indian classical dance .Shiamak himself has opined about this

Ummm did Sudha really really decline the offer cuz sony was asking us to vote for her and they even promoted her. 😕 i think her so called decline was just a comment she made on the concept of the wild card to an IF reporter BEFORE sony actually announced the wild card or even approached her so plz spare us the sermon of how sudhaji with all her maturity refused the offer. ppl need to stop assuming that sudha declined the wild card entry becuz she was being promoted by sony and ppl actually voted for her ME being one of them. so plz spare the personal judgements on dere individual and personal characters.. yes there public figures but that only gives us the right to judge & opine about their careers NOT their personal traits and judge what they think is dignified or not.

and itz not Sudhaji and prachi's problem that sony decided on the wildcard.

andddd plz don't start on wuts fair and not fair. is it fair that ronit roy exaggerated if not straight faced lied about his choeographers injury? is it fair that there are some contestants in the show who have already tried their hand at dancing. For example, Sandhya being a student of shaimak's school.

another thing, know that BBC owns the format of JDJ and not sony and lik someone else said bbc wud have to approve it.

I think this unfair Wild Card Round has created quite a storm in the forum 😉

Well this time JDJ is looking quite partial right from the beginning

First was the Mika issue ..Still its a mystry as to from where he got so many votes until he was eliminated 😕

Then comes Judges favouring some of the contestents like Negiji because of the Chak De effect 😉 and also Sandhya sinse she once was a student of Shiamak's dancing school 😉

Then of course comes this Unfair Wild Card Round where only two eliminated contestents r considered while the rest r simply ignored

I think Mr.Siddharth Basu who is the producer of this show needs to answer all these Queries asked by the General Public 😊

this is ok with me
if they would bring all contestants for the wild card then may be it would happen tht someone who came back was not a nice dancer and they have nominated sudha and prachi on the basis of judges points and viewers choice so it is ok

I am in two minds - should there have been a wild card round for all the contestants? One one hand Prachi would have won even if the wild card round would have been for all the contestants. So the channel spared the other contestants from working too hard for something that they would probably not have won anyway. On the other hand, it is clearly unfair, and I would have welcomed seeing other contestants, especially Cyrus, back. It would have also put Sony in a better light because of fairness. Anyway, what is done is done.

Oh another topic on fairness.

Lets just assess the fairness of each participant and the show:

Sony would not have approved for Nicole Performance had the injury not been very small. So her injury could not have been Severe. But what did she and her Mighty Fairness partner said on the show, they said it is severe, internal injury and internal bleeding in both legs. That is exaggeration and playing a small injury as something so big. That is fair isnt it?

About Sonali, the madam said she is also learning dance for the first time like others, but she has already learnt dance before and she is blatantly lying. Oh that is fair and okay?

About Sandhya, she is actually competing with non-dancers when she has learnt dance in Shaimak's school itself. Having danced before definitely gives edge over others who did not even try dancing before. She fights, cries and accuses the judges of not giving high marks untill the judges get her nothing less than 30. Instead of taking what the judges say and give, she has to make a huge cry about it and that is soooo fair, isnt?

On what basis is negi getting 30 week after week. Extraordinary performance or for his hardwork at this age. If it is about hardwork, then everyone is putting in their hardwork. That is so fair isnt it?

The format of the whole show is not even fair as they are not playing even with some non-dancers and some proffessional dancers.

See, nothing is so fair in this whole game. I absoutely agree to the fact that it is UNFAIR for the wildcard not to be introduced to ALL the elimated participants and the rules being changed suddenly. BUT how can you blame Prachi for it?

Everybody is saying that Prachi fans are bias, so be it and so are other people's fan.

Btw, Is Ekta soo big that she can influence BBC to change the format?

Firstly, can you even believe that Prachi got low votes. Even if it was Diwali while others got votes how is that even possible that PRachi did not. She even won an award for the best actress which happened recently and that award was based on voting. Ppl voted for her on that competiting with other fans but did not vote for her for JDJ. Ppl are making noice about her elimination but did not vote for her. Can you even believe this? Prachi was made a scapegoat in TRP game and she is the one is being blamed if audience want her back.

Since everyone is taking about fairness, fine be fair and fair for one and all. Tell me who has been oh so fair in this JDJ. Nor the Big B of small screen was oh so fair, nor the big screen actress was oh so fair, nor the judge's student was oh so fair. But nobody blames them but everyone has to jump on Prachi when she was not the one who decided on wildcard round. Her ouster did bring the issue of wildcard but SHE DID NOT decide and dictated SOny to have one.

Btw,how do you know that Sudhaji did not participate in WC. If she did not participate, how could Sony be asking for votes for her? Wouldnt she have come up to the media and declined that she is not taking part in WC if she is not?

Instead of seeing this as a post from Prachi's fan, see this in all fairness.

Cheers,
Meena

Originally posted by: Je_aime

Oh another topic on fairness.

Lets just assess the fairness of each participant and the show:

Sony would not have approved for Nicole Performance had the injury not been very small. So her injury could not have been Severe. But what did she and her Mighty Fairness partner said on the show, they said it is severe, internal injury and internal bleeding in both legs. That is exaggeration and playing a small injury as something so big. That is fair isnt it?

About Sonali, the madam said she is also learning dance for the first time like others, but she has already learnt dance before and she is blatantly lying. Oh that is fair and okay?

About Sandhya, she is actually competing with non-dancers when she has learnt dance in Shaimak's school itself. Having danced before definitely gives edge over others who did not even try dancing before. She fights, cries and accuses the judges of not giving high marks untill the judges get her nothing less than 30. Instead of taking what the judges say and give, she has to make a huge cry about it and that is soooo fair, isnt?

On what basis is negi getting 30 week after week. Extraordinary performance or for his hardwork at this age. If it is about hardwork, then everyone is putting in their hardwork. That is so fair isnt it?

The format of the whole show is not even fair as they are not playing even with some non-dancers and some proffessional dancers.

See, nothing is so fair in this whole game. I absoutely agree to the fact that it is UNFAIR for the wildcard not to be introduced to ALL the elimated participants and the rules being changed suddenly. BUT how can you blame Prachi for it?

Everybody is saying that Prachi fans are bias, so be it and so are other people's fan.

Btw, Is Ekta soo big that she can influence BBC to change the format?

Firstly, can you even believe that Prachi got low votes. Even if it was Diwali while others got votes how is that even possible that PRachi did not. She even won an award for the best actress which happened recently and that award was based on voting. Ppl voted for her on that competiting with other fans but did not vote for her for JDJ. Ppl are making noice about her elimination but did not vote for her. Can you even believe this? Prachi was made a scapegoat in TRP game and she is the one is being blamed if audience want her back.

Since everyone is taking about fairness, fine be fair and fair for one and all. Tell me who has been oh so fair in this JDJ. Nor the Big B of small screen was oh so fair, nor the big screen actress was oh so fair, nor the judge's student was oh so fair. But nobody blames them but everyone has to jump on Prachi when she was not the one who decided on wildcard round. Her ouster did bring the issue of wildcard but SHE DID NOT decide and dictated SOny to have one.

Btw,how do you know that Sudhaji did not participate in WC. If she did not participate, how could Sony be asking for votes for her? Wouldnt she have come up to the media and declined that she is not taking part in WC if she is not?

Instead of seeing this as a post from Prachi's fan, see this in all fairness.

Cheers,
Meena

g8 behna, u have said it all.