SIKKIM: Gangtok sends 50,000 votes for Baichung’s - Page 6

Originally posted by: sakshiluvskaran

do u seriously thnik they didnt vote before that surely they did its like aftersome time they started campaigning and got aggressive but voting they were doing from the start

In that case karan got highest votes in very first episode so how will you justify it? Its karan fdans who kkept voting for him blindly prior to whether he scored good or not.

N-E did vote in beginning but that time they had not planned for a joint support that time. They decided to back him up jointly ONLY after he scored 3 30's and started giving wonderful performances. Why wont they start campaing aggressively when they hav already decided to back him up jointly and have a plan of action? As I said before also that once they come into action noone will be able to stand in front of them. And I can proudly say that Baichung never disappointed them or us as at the end he made us proud when he everytime got compliments from judges and got highest scores of the season similarly N-E showed their support to him by giving Highest votes so its fair support from both the sides.

Originally posted by: anushka143

In that case karan got highest votes in very first episode so how will you justify it? Its karan fdans who kkept voting for him blindly prior to whether he scored good or not.

N-E did vote in beginning but that time they had not planned for a joint support that time. They decided to back him up jointly ONLY after he scored 3 30's and started giving wonderful performances. Why wont they start campaing aggressively when they hav already decided to back him up jointly and have a plan of action? As I said before also that once they come into action noone will be able to stand in front of them. And I can proudly say that Baichung never disappointed them or us as at the end he made us proud when he everytime got compliments from judges and got highest scores of the season similarly N-E showed their support to him by giving Highest votes so its fair support from both the sides.

Originally posted by: mysticwater24

<-----JDJ forum

😆

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu

I would just like to point out some points, in any and every reality show certain parts are scripted which helps in increasing the TRPs and bring in more votes which means more mulla for the channel

1. Every reality shows have some amount of controversy surrounding some participants, some created by them and some confusions raised by VT which is edited. The case holds true with Gauhar

2. They tried their head to toe to associate as much amount of controversy with Karan as possible, implicating him of romantic linkage with Nichole or gay relationship with Ram etc, but he is a smart man so he got out of troubles far more easily which Gauhar could not

3. The channels were very much aware of the voting power of both Karan fans and NE which they were sure BB would get and also the dynamics behind it. Hence more the bashing for Karan more votes for him.

All the above cases holds true for any program and that is how programs are designed. A perfect example is the forum. Most agree that Hard Kaur was the best dancer followed by Gauhar or vise versa but most threads around 90+% were related to either Karan or Bhaichung and I can assure you the case is true with most of simmilar types of forums. So at the end its the channel who is the winner.

Originally posted by: anushka143

As far as dancing is concerned so its NOT all about how good dancer you are rather its all about how good yuu perform on stage ofcouse dancing plays a important role but overall its your performance. Gauhar must be a good dancer BUT performance wise most of her performances were weaker then Baichung thats because Baichung showed terrific growth as a dancer so at the end of the day its all about how good you perform on the stage.

Coming on to controversies so he isnt lucky but with the sort of nature he has its quiet impossible to drag him into controversy. The guy is busy all the time in football sessions and then comes to mumbai to do practice for jhalak and then he is only busy with his practice.

Talking about campaing so those office people had INVITED Baichung to their office as they kept a special meet with him, he didnt go there by himself to beg for votes. They love him so they invited him. He didnt come online in a public forum accessible all over india and said that vote for me cuz I'm hardworking and deserve to win. He never said this, who deserves to win is what janta and judga will decide and NOT participant or his wife.

Originally posted by: nish_k

I agree with anushka143..bhaichung won because of his hard work and the improvemnt he showed was tremendous..

Originally posted by: Dr.KaranSG

Before killing me....please read and try to comprehend my point....some of you will find my post long as an essay...I know so no need to tell me.

I respect that BB won and all the power to him and Sonia. This article proves that whoever lobbies for votes the best wins. Now the lobbying factor for votes may be a celeb's popularity or a celeb's regional affiliation. And I am not complaining as I know that this is the format...it's always 50% judges and 50% votes. So Baichung got more votes and he won....my only problem is that had Karan won....the same voting system would have been a contention of debate....and this dichotomy is quite unbearable to say the least.

I know many will say that BB could dance and Karan cannot.....to that I would say everyone is entitled to their opinion. I think both of them as dancers have good and bad qualities.

My only point is: It is always the voting that decides the winner....so whoever lobbies for votes and has maximum support will win period. And quite frankly the judges knew that Gauhar is far better dancer than BB...again my opinion..you can disagree...so why did they not blame the voting system now?

Also no where does the article mention dance...so I safely conclude that the majority of people from the North East were voting on the basis of regionalism.....isn't that blind voting as well? I am only asking because time and again I have been abused and called a "blind K-babe". So voting for Karan because of his so called "armaan" image is blind voting but voting because someone is from the same region as you is not blind voting?
Again I am not complaining that BB won...I accept the fact that the entire North East came out and voted so he won....no two ways about it. But I am just talking about principals here.

Please try to maintain a civil atmosphere here and refrain from name calling.
Peace.