marks Warning on PG 41 READ everyone - Page 17

Originally posted by: danceismyworld

Healthy discussion..huh!!

Originally posted by: tannipartner

Originally posted by: TheRowdiest

and ppl want this thread to get close bcz we r Criticizing GC's dance ??????

yah they must be expecting rude replies so that they can report and make this thread close

mission successful

yes healthy discussion ...read whole thread u will understand ... there is no bashing in this thread ... if u guys find any criticism of GC is bashing its not my problem but urs 😛

Originally posted by: quarky

Red - my replies.

Thanks for pointing out the mistakes! I feel like kicking myself for the Mayurbhanj Chau and DID. 😆

Originally posted by: quarky

I still haven't seen a proper critique of his dance. His "flaws" that Shampa "hid", All you say is he sucks. That surely can't be a great topic for discussion now, can it? Someone else mentioned that his ending was raw and rough.. well I'm not sure if you've watched DID1, the dance with Vrushali and Mayuresh's tribal dance. According to me that seemed a bit raw, and that was choreographed by Terence (who im sure you'll agree is a fantastic choreographer) but sometimes going with the theme, you need to exude a bit of rawness. Imo, a wild lion cannot be expected to be graceful, some movements have to be jumpy and aggressive. I shouldnt even compare Vrushali-Mayuresh with GC because they are trained dancers - but you get the gist.

so u mean to say we shld know each and every small aspect of a dance form only then we r allowed to criticize ? I am not a dance expert and i will go what i see and what i feel , and for small technique flaws or strength i go with judge's comments ...i go with what i enjoyed and what not ... without being expert i can say there were lots of flaws and it was NOT at all a perfect performance for which they did not deserve 30 ...if he was so perfect then why judges did not mention it, like they do most of the time that this step was perfect , this was like this and that, GC has improved and etc etc etc ...there was not a single comment abt it , it was all abt his makeup and roaring act thats it ... my main topic is saying that its a biased marking bcz judges did not point out a single mistake , which is their duty ...and there were so many flaws and they just went ahead and gave them 30 ...

u r generalizing me as his hater by saying I m doing all this bcz i feel he sucks ... i can also say same abt u that u r doing all this bcz u r blind hmmm shampa fan ? or even GC fan 😉 ... as far as i know not each and every member is dance expert and only experts r not the audience ...

And if you think that in this performance, shampa has successfully "hid" GC's flaws, then that means his dance was good, but what bothered you was that his "flaws" weren't visible?

I never said she successfully HID his flaws , if this was the case then why except his fans all other r feeling he didn't deserve 30 ? ...I said bcz of his makeup and those actions , roaring act , flaws took BACKSEAT ...judges just ignored bcz they just supposed to give him 30

Next time you want to open a thread that involves a dance and say this was bad, be sure to let us know if the dance is bad, choreography was bad or the fact that you don't like the celebrity. Will avoid a lot of comments from neutrals like me (although I have no problem with GC and I think he's working pretty hard).

I will open a topic next time too abt dance ofcourse as its JDJ and comments will be abt dance only and i don't need anyone's permission ... i mentioned everything u said I shld have mentioned , but u want to ignore those or ignored or didn't read the thread properly 😉 ... for u shampa is perfect and can't choreograph bad ...and frm no way u r neutral dear just bcz u r not criticizing them u became neutral and i and other became Hater bcz we didn't like their performance 😆 ...btw how many times GC fans mention why he Deserved 30 or good marks when they open threads like i M dead, it was perfect and etc etc ect ?????? 😉 and abt this thread ...reasons why i didn't like their performance r very well mentioned and many other members too mentioned those and frm no way i said he deserved ZERO as i feel u r assuming that i meant to say his performance was totally crap ...its just he did not deserve 30 ... 27 or may be 28 wld have fine

I found somewhere else that you wrote Prathyusha deserved a 26 ATLEAST. Well, let me give you a "critique" of her performance. Where she was supposed to portray fire, she was really weak, her elbows were constantly drooping throught the performance, her back was slouched. Her movements weren't complete and she seemed very nervous. Her expression was sort of blank, and I thought in that 30 second intro before the dance, she was much better.

yes she had flaws thats why i did not say she deserved 30 but 26 ...24 were too less and if GC cld have get 30 why not 26 for her ?

I love Prathyusha and she has the body to be very good, so lets hope her choreographer finds her strength and uses it to her. 24 itself was a little too much for me for this dance. I thought Giaa deserved the 24-25 rather than Prathyusha but hey. thats just my opinion.

yes Gia too deserved more marks than what she got

You have all the rights to think the marks are scripted, its definitely possible. But seems to me that your point was to prove GC was incapable of churning out a good performance - and I like to politely disagree. Anyone can be good with practice and he showed that last week.

now if he is doing bad , i didn't like his performance and I am not his fan i am not allowed to criticize him ? everyone has their own views , some biased some not ... i have no problem u being a fan and defending them unlike u having a problem with me for saying their performance bad 😛...but saying other r just not allowed to comment on him or open threads and just Generalize them as " haters" or that they have some problem with GC is absolutely not right thing ... chk first 4-5 pages ...so u mean to say all those ppl r having some problem with GC only thats why they didn't like his performance ?

if anyone wanna defend him do it just like ppl r criticizing them ...but labeling them as Haters or biased is not done ...I can also do the same ...but i don't want this thread to get close ...as some even tried to do so