who is nice? - Page 3

Originally posted by: envious_eyes

no purab is not nice although he is oh sooo handsome..he left jassi midway bcoz of some stupid female bhadkaoing him-stupid fellow..whereas nandu has always been there for her..nandu is the best..

Hey i like the word bhadkaoing....lol don mind.......itz funny

Originally posted by: Minnie

😆😆😆 terrific daisy!!

Originally posted by: sneha_09

Hey i like the word bhadkaoing....lol don mind.......itz funny

And how does her interpretation of your definition become 'her' definition?

Does that mean my interpretation of Newton's definition of gravity or motion which I would be kind enough to elaborate for everyone to see,they would cease to be Newton's and become mine???????????

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Purab and Armaan's issue is barely as important as Newton's definition of gravity Minnie😆. It's like you are comparing the sky with the ground. There is a whole universe of difference between them. Come on, chill, it's not that serious of a deal. Gravity is essential, this is just a show. lols😆. We just like to talk about it here and share our views and interpretations of the soap as this is an addictive forum where all of us with different views come together. 😃

But if you want to see it in the educational way, you can look at various literary works where one can interpret things depending on THEIR point of view. There are many ways of seeing things. Daisy sees niceness in Armaan as she likes Armaan (I can't fathom why...but that's the case. Why would anyone like Armaan? 😕. THAT's a different issue. No need to explain it to me because it simply doesn't make sense to me 😆 maybe I am dense here, but then, so is many other people who hate Armaan. SO all these people cannot be dense as they are the majority. Hence, I am not dense).

I repeat, there are different ways of seeing things and interpreting them. I respect Daisy's view, it's her choice to see however she likes and base her opinion on that. That's HER interpretation. So if Armaan or something associated with him is nice in her interpretation, her definition of nice would go along with that character. Not everone necessarily needs to interpret nice the same way.😊

Originally posted by: buli123

hey girls you take two persons to equate with our mr. nice guy 😃. then purav is surely twice good as armaan and raj 😛

absolutely agree with you buli. thanks for the support. 😉

And how does her interpretation of your definition become 'her' definition?

Does that mean my interpretation of Newton's definition of gravity or motion which I would be kind enough to elaborate for everyone to see,they would cease to be Newton's and become mine???????????

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey by the way Minnie, I apoligize for not writing this earlier... Thanks for comparing me with Newton. 😆😉

Originally posted by: MR2006

Come on, chill, it's not that serious of a deal

????????????

😆 Thanks for the concern my dear Mr 6, but it takes a lot more to ruffle my feathers.

Originally posted by: MR2006

And how does her interpretation of your definition become 'her' definition?

Does that mean my interpretation of Newton's definition of gravity or motion which I would be kind enough to elaborate for everyone to see,they would cease to be Newton's and become mine???????????

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Purab and Armaan's issue is barely as important as Newton's definition of gravity Minnie😆. It's like you are comparing the sky with the ground. There is a whole universe of difference between them. Come on, chill, it's not that serious of a deal. Gravity is essential, this is just a show. lols😆. We just like to talk about it here and share our views and interpretations of the soap as this is an addictive forum where all of us with different views come together. 😃

But if you want to see it in the educational way, you can look at various literary works where one can interpret things depending on THEIR point of view. There are many ways of seeing things. Daisy sees niceness in Armaan as she likes Armaan (I can't fathom why...but that's the case. Why would anyone like Armaan? 😕. THAT's a different issue. No need to explain it to me because it simply doesn't make sense to me 😆 maybe I am dense here, but then, so is many other people who hate Armaan. SO all these people cannot be dense as they are the majority. Hence, I am not dense).

I repeat, there are different ways of seeing things and interpreting them. I respect Daisy's view, it's her choice to see however she likes and base her opinion on that. That's HER interpretation. So if Armaan or something associated with him is nice in her interpretation, her definition of nice would go along with that character. Not everone necessarily needs to interpret nice the same way.😊

You missed the point.Everything said and done,it still is your definition she interpreted.Not hers.

Equating things never lessen a value or changes it and examples are just that,examples.And can be taken from anywhere,earth,moon,sky or the universe .And beleive me,passion is hardly ever selective...............so be it the sky or the ground,passionate don't discriminate when defending either.......

😆 Minnie,U r 2 much.😆😆😆

👏 FANTASTIC Daisy👏 Very witty👏.👏 & Very very intelligent😆

BTW,she didn't use Raj in any point for himself,so how does it compare Purab to two of them??😕

????????????

😆 Thanks for the concern my dear Mr 6, but it takes a lot more to ruffle my feathers.

My pleasure entirely.Raising someone stature,deserving or not,always gives indescribable pleasure ..........😉