Why has Vikram's acting changed ? - Page 3

Originally posted by: mcdreamy.

You won't get a genuine discussion on this thread cos this is merely your opinion and not everyone thinks the same as you. I have no qualms with Vikram's acting, I think he's doing a fine job. To have a genuine discussion people would have to agree with you first, which not everyone will.

This is just like me opening a thread saying SV cannot act and is literally expressionless cause that's MY OPINION and asking people what's wrong with his acting. That will obviously offend his fans and ignite fan wars not a genuine discussion.

Originally posted by: mcdreamy.

I've said this before to you but you obv missed this on another thread so just repeating here :)

I'm sorry but I always see you make a big deal about how ViTharv fans name call and get personal etc, but don't you do the same? I've seen you do that many times, calling us fans brainless and full of hormones etc etc. Isn't that getting personal too? Fact is that EVERYONE gets personal here, I've probably done that too so this moral policing really needs to stop unless you're actually doodh ka dhula and have never got personal. If you're gonna moral police then at least practice what you preach :)

Originally posted by: anjs

@ bold : that was used for lack of better word. And I have changed it after someone got offended with that word.

You just read the dialogue part ? Or did you read the acting part too, in the topic ? Cause ur reply only tells me how I don't have a right to mention Vikram and also about dialogue.

Isnt he the one acting... ofcourse I will point at him, when he is acting... when its Vividha, i will pose a question for Shivani...

Originally posted by: _innocent_

Thank you for changing that term. However, I was expecting you to explain the differences between the two terms as you appear well verse in it, and it would have worked as an enlightenment to others members who clearly do not understand difference (me included.)

No, i dont know the difference...that is why the topic...clearly my words failed to tell you the reason. I dont know if a man who has been hurt in the head, recovers in phases like this.

I answered each of your questions posed in your thread. I said Atharv is showing differences phases of recovery thus the difference in the acting (I fail to understand why you've overlooked that part and claim am merely stuck on your dialogue query.) And since you've said he is not recovering, I said, there was no point entertaining such query. Maybe, I was unclear...for that I apologise.

No i dont believe a man recovers like that, when he is mentally not stable. Yet you have witnessed such recovery, then i wouldnt query you further.

Secondly, @bold...perhaps you ought to stop assuming things, because I definitely did not ask you restrict your queries in regards to Vikram. Last I checked, I was not his boss and this is a free world.

That is how most of Vitharva fans are... They rather just orders people around.

The dialogue query, with all due respect, was rather dumb, would you not agree? As the actors are not the one coming up with their dialogues. Rather it is served to them on a platter, to voice out. Unless, they were asked to act spontaneously, which am going to assume they were not. I can understand asking why the character is coming up with such dumbness as it does not fit their characterization, and perhaps that's what you meant? Again, lack of clarity from my side perhaps?

No the dialogue question, isnt dumb. Whoever hands over the dialogues, its lame to use that, And I am not even pointing it to Vikram, If you just connect it to Vikram, due to it being in the same topic, then i cannot help it.

And, am glad to know you'll pose similar questions for each actors' when you feel their ability to act are lacking.

Yes, My discussion has mostly been for all actors, and i have my set POV, which i tend to put forth, but just cause I praise Ravish, And pointed to a few things against Atharva and Vividha, which i didnt agree with. I am being called out and even taunted at. But anyways, i rather not care about such comments.

Originally posted by: anjs

No dear...that is not the case... if there are genuine people who believe in your thread, they will reply genuinely... even i will, by stating what i feel at that time...

If you think he is doing fine...then this thread is not for you...or maybe you can reason out the change in his behavior...if you want to, that is...

What is there to get offended by criticism in acting... They are doing their job, we are watching it...this is a forum meant to discuss the show and acting being a part of it, will be discussed.

I am not bashing his personal life...or cursing him or calling out names

Originally posted by: anjs

ok, i will change that word...

but my question remains... the problem with his state seems to have changed

Originally posted by: anjs

show me one thread that i opened to bash vitharva fans...infact it is vitharva fans who started bashing me without any rhyme or reason, and i just state the truth in any thread that opens. I have seen vitharva fans acting so out of line... and i still wonder how they are still around.

anyways...you can do whatever you want... cause you are just pointing at SV to instigate me...and darling, m not gonna take your bait... you dont like SV and his acting skill, fine, good for you...

but my question remains... Vikram's acting was too good when he had entered...now it has changed...what caused it... if you have the answer then comment...else you can kindly ignore...and if you still want to comment, be my guest, but then it will be royally ignored 😛