Posted:
Stop right there.
I assure you I have not watched these actors anywhere before, nor am I biased or prejudiced towards one character. I see the situation for what it is and I do not make vague statements. All my posts and claims are backed by innumerable evidences and points to support my claim for this very reason. It is rather disappointing how many of Neil's mistakes are overlooked and this irritates many members including myself. I argue what I see, not because I have a particular liking of the actors and so on, I have little interest in them, their looks, life, my only focus is their actions in the show. How those characters behave in the show is my priority.
And because you have claimed that I ignore the spur of moments decisions because it's Ragini, please go to my prior posts and reread what I wrote. I asked you to analyze WHY those decisions were made. For many of us as stated, these were concrete reasons for separation and we argued why. Trust is not something that can be belittled again and again however this is again overlooked. I personally believe that the reasons as to why someone take a hasty decision is more important than the decision itself which is why I find that to be the larger problem! If those are fixed, why would make those decisions in the first place! Do you get this? You are arguing that Ragini should've listened, given him a chance and so on just because he loves her?! He has broken her trust innumerable times and you still expect her to listen to him with an open mind.
Once again I have told you we do not look at a male and female differently!!!! I give numerous evidences why I support who I do, I couldn't care less of whatever gender they were, my main focus is their actions. You can argue my evidence but you cannot say I am defending one character meaninglessly when I have clearly provided you evidence. You say you agree to but then you say otherwise.
Hold on again, the renounced apology, as a mature adult would realize this
-her husband who lied on numerous occasions to her finally is trusted again
-she then finds evidence that her husband might be at fault and actually cheated on her.
-husband once again confesses that he hid something from her,
Any normal person would be pissed off. Like I just trusted you again and then you tell me you hid something else. Is this getting to you?
By the way Ragini did give him a chance to explain. But before that, we are defending the fact how her husband is not trustworthy. Her decisions made sense because she was not engaged to him, she was not promised to him, her children knew nothing about their reunion, it did not affect them because they did not know anything in the first place, only Neil and Ragini were aware of what was going on between them. Ragini knew that if this man hid something else from her, it can turn deadly and once again lead to something else. She asked again and again for his honesty and at that point she realized it would be better to end the relationship now then to hurt all of them in the future when they tell the children and then break it up. You see this? Analyze the reason behind the decisions!
As for Aarav, Ragini did not expect anything from Aarav, she knew he would be mad but she promised herself that she would prove to be a better parent to him and mend their relationships.
As for Aman, Ragini already made all the points clear and Aman knew what he was getting in to, she told she couldn't love him in that way. It was all very clear what was happening.
As for rishab, you do realize that Ragini knows she wasn't there for her side of the kids but she doesn't go on claiming rights on Neil's side of the children. Neil has been claiming rights on Ragini's side for a while however Ragini is arguing that he can't claim rights on them because he wasn't there for them just as she can't claim rights on his children!
We do not only defend Ragini's actions, we tell you the other side and how things are still not evened out. You make many statements which we as the audience have evidence for to argue which is why we present them.
I am not pro Neil or pro Ragini, I am simply arguing the case, I present evidence for them however if you cannot argue them, please do not make a statement that I am prejudice or as is any member of the forum. We understand your points but we disagree with them and hence provide you why we do. There is no need to get offended or assume that we are just hell bent on defending Ragini, no we know that both characters are at fault but we are arguing the few statements you made which can be argued however in Ragini's favor.
As for the person who made a claim about belittling woman and using it to argue Ragini's case, look back to the first post and see all our facts and evidences and see if that is included in the statement. No, it isn't! Many of us are arguing that Neil is at fault too and that consideration has to be acknowledged as well. Reread the evidence we provided and understand those.
Hiphop, you cannot say you agree with something but then say but this...
If that statement is true and valid than we already have presented ourselves with a reason that is strong enough to back our case. It is a fact that we used and you cannot claim we're merely being prejudice.
Hiphop, you have no right to say that I am biased when I have provided all evidence to prove my points! If I had made general statements without evidence, you could claim that however you simply are blaming me without proof.
CID
