Let's talk morals!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

prettypri

@prettypri

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: rima
you nailed it
the so called emancipated lo miss the simple fact that even in emancipated societies illegitimte children are sad sufferers
the family disintegrates
there is no 'happily ever after for such couples
there are so many choices to make
as to what is the right thing to do

I worked in a child support project for my organization in US
And I can tell you all this romaticisation of casual sex is bull
The reality is ugly
And this is not about morality

Very true...I don't know why It is even considered liberal or progressive thinking to be n favour of casual sex...something that has the potential to cause such imbalances and suffering is never a good thing...morals and values don't come into this...it's a question of responsible choices in life..

Edited by prettypri - 12 years ago

Quote

207shikha

@207shikha

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

#12

If they show Aarav as Arnav's son then it is the end of ArShi.
Khusi will have no place in Arnav's life then.
[/QUOTE

exactly.! 'cuz that fact alone will shatter many hearts.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Flora3333

@Flora3333

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#13

A wonderful post! 👏

Agree with u on the point that Khushi should leave ASR and his son's mother alone after knowing the truth! Because the kid deserves to be with both of his parents. And that will destroy/end the story.
Sigh. Many people don't understand that.
"We live in 21st century and premarital sex is not a big deal these days"/ "let Arshi deal with it" / "Arshi bond will get stronger by this" kind of statements make no sense to me.

Quote

GodhuliLogon

@GodhuliLogon

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: Flora3333
A wonderful post! 👏

Agree with u on the point that Khushi should leave ASR and his son's mother alone after knowing the truth! Because the kid deserves to be with both of his parents. And that will destroy/end the story.
Sigh. Many people don't understand that.
"We live in 21st century and premarital sex is not a big deal these days"/ "let Arshi deal with it" / "Arshi bond will get stronger by this" kind of statements make no sense to me.

@ bold .. I really dont have idea how some of the sensible TMs are talking like this.. I still cant understand.. :(

Quote

nafisa

@NAFISA09

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: Afya
If Arav was indeed his son...Then his commitment should be to his son in addition to Khushi. And not to the son's mother.

I fail to see why Arnav should leave Khushi to be with Arav's mother. Which son would want their parents to be in an unhappy relationship forcefully for his sake? And that too, a son who never knew his father all this while?

Arnav can still be a father to Arav and husband to Khushi.

But having said all of this, I don't want any of this to happen.

I want Arnav's first child to be Khushi's.

i don want the kid to b Arnav's child...

Edited by NAFISA09 - 12 years ago

Quote

Frigate

@Frigate

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: rima
you nailed it
the so called emancipated lo miss the simple fact that even in emancipated societies illegitimte children are sad sufferers
the family disintegrates
there is no 'happily ever after for such couples
there are so many choices to make
as to what is the right thing to do

I worked in a child support project for my organization in US
And I can tell you all this romaticisation of casual sex is bull
The reality is ugly
And this is not about morality

Rima, the west is now awakening to the difference a 2 parent household makes to a child's upbringing! This is one of the biggest things Obama has been asking of the African-American community (since they have the largest numbers of single parent families; mostly mother). Glad to know you agree, because morally, I find it wrong that Arnav would want to have the cake (Khushi) and eat it too (Arav).

I am a mother and under all circumstances feel the child comes before any adult; parent or other wise. If Arnav loves Khushi so he wants her to stick around while he plays house with Arav and his mother few hours a week, what good is it doing to anyone?

Quote

Frigate

@Frigate

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: godhuli12

@ bold .. I really dont have idea how some of the sensible TMs are talking like this.. I still cant understand.. :(

That is what prompted me to make the post. Because, there seem to be 2 extremes in opinions of forum members. Either they were delusional that Arnav was a virgin, hence Arav can't be his son or Arnav was a philanderer and should be acceptable in this day and age. I would not have a problem with Arnav's intimacy with other women if there was no child on hand.

Quote

Frigate

@Frigate

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: prettypri

All good points...however I Don't agree tat Khushi shild walk away if Aarav is Arnavs son...Arnav would then have a responsibility towards the child and nt the mom...he didn't knw about the child and it's been so many years...it's not hs fault he moved on and certainly not Khushis fault that she is now in his life...
It's an unfortunate situation...and the kid is an innocent victim agreed but all will have to compromise in that case...I don't think he would have a normal life even if Arnav were to build a life with his mom as he doesn't love her..so Khushis sacrifice would have no meaning then...

Anyway ths is conjecture... Don't think we are heading for this in the show as it would be too complicated..

But, what good will it do for Khushi? She will suffer a different way. I am tired of that! Is it too much to expect Khushi will have a few moments of untainted bliss in her marriage? First it was he Di ka problem solve karo, now an illegitimate child her husband fathered? Frankly, this may even have been acceptable, if the CVs had spent a few weeks dedicated to Arhi's relationship; brought back the passion and shown strength via small gestures from both Khushi and Arnav.

Quote

Frigate

@Frigate

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: Afya
If Arav was indeed his son...Then his commitment should be to his son in addition to Khushi. And not to the son's mother.

I fail to see why Arnav should leave Khushi to be with Arav's mother. Which son would want their parents to be in an unhappy relationship forcefully for his sake? And that too, a son who never knew his father all this while?

Arnav can still be a father to Arav and husband to Khushi.

But having said all of this, I don't want any of this to happen.

I want Arnav's first child to be Khushi's.

@GREEN: I am saying Khushi should leave Arnav it the other way round! If she stays, all she will get is more suffering. Just not worth it IMO.

Quote

rvarier

@rvarier

Navigator

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#20

I think the CV's should not introduce any talk of Arnav and Sheetal being together at all. Maybe they were just classmates.

The child could just be a catalyst for Khushi and ASR realizing that they want to have a kid together. Especially Khushi would feel the need to have Jr. ASR in her life too.

Maybe Sheetal and her husband who is also like ASR can be estranged and Khushi and Arnav can help unite them. Maybe the only reason she is uncomfortable with Arnav and Khushi is becox she has had an unhappy marriage herself and she does not want Arnav to know she has been a failure. All of us have felt the same many times, when we meet old friends after sometime and we do nt want them to know about our failures.

In such case no issue of morality will arise and no repetition of storyline of any other serial will occur.

Quote

1 2 3

Let's talk morals! - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics