Originally posted by: geetmaanluv
i agree with geet.. i would not characterize its as all out bashing but i think khushi character was under a very very critical eye. the way arnav and his actions are not analyzed but i thought... an this is what i thought.. people were not happy with sanaya performance of khushi but instead of saying that people kept talking abt khushi. so it got a little over board .. imo. for me khushi is a as interesting as arnav but her character development is not given the same treatment as arnav.
Ruks,
I have not said that Khushi was treated like a satin flower , what I have said is that many were disppointed with Khushi's PORTRAYAL n expressed what they wanted to see ...
Na, SI was not the issue here, the way Khushi was conceived was the issue here ..SI is always impeccable in comedy ... I do not think we commented on SI * Don't put a bomb n say that we commented on SI too 😊**
Ur last line is what we were discussing , Ruks and wondering WHY is Khushi not paid the same attention as Arnav?? it came out in tones of anger, frustration, disappointment, sadness, logic... but the underlying theme was same..WHY IS KHUSHI BEING NEGLECTED??
16