Posted:
Originally posted by: showstruck
That poem did not apply to all women then and it does not apply to all women now.
The question is the women to whom it applies to then and now. How much has the percentage changed?In my country it depends a lot on the social class of the particular person. Social class that is financially defined.Behaviour from khushi's family was expected for me...if they could say you are not my blood to an orphan before, I knew they will say it again. Thinking it would be Garima not buaji. She is the one who forced her to get engaged to Shyam and never said sorry. Khushi never said you could do this to me cos you are not my blood...
Thanks for commenting showstruck.
I mentioned the same ...that poem did and does not apply to all women. But it does apply to most of the societies be it eastern or western. And I believe till date the number it applies to is quite big. It has not much to do with the financial bracket initially.
Ofcourse later financial freedom comes into play.
Take for e.g it applies to Anjali ( high social class) --she is pregnant, husband cheating...in the end will be left alone with tears and a baby to bring up. It applies to Khushi (middle class) Used by a male of high social class, will be left after 6 months, crying and no where to go, financially broke, baby or no baby to bring up..who knows...I mean its just an e.g. we see many such stories every other day. esp. in western world, every other home is a broken home. The lady is single mom, husband cheated or got bored or didn't find her compatible and left. (There is vice-versa too but that's another topic.)
Ofcourse now the lady in question is financially independent but the heartbreak, tears and kids were hers then and are hers now.
P.s we are talking generalized e.g. here,not specific.
And you are right...Khushi never said to buaji you did this to me...cuz im not ur blood. a very valid point.👍🏼
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
Anupamaa
