Heyy...I am sorry for having to say this but can we please be a little kind and patient. If the topic maker believes he
(Arnav) is
negative, we can justify why we don't think he is negative, but why drag words such as
disgusting and
get the hell...when we can argue it out with sense and proof? This forum is really starting to get mean. We will come across people who we completely disagree with, but is it right to take away their right to speak their mind? I-F is here so we can share our opinions and thoughts, as long as its within the codes of I-F. If it bugs you, just ignore! I obviously mean no offense to any, just trying to show we have other options then to write mean stuff.
@TM: I don't agree with the post because where Arnav has flawed here, he has also proven to be kind, and sensible. Every human possess good and bad traits. Arnav's actions may not be justified completely, but his intention is not to ruin an innocent life. He thinks he is punishing the bad and bringing justice to the good (his Sister). As someone who has seen Arnav in his good and bad, I find it quite harsh to compare him and Shyam. To term someone negative that early, is being a bit too irrational and quick. The story is yet to unfold and I am sure Arnav will provide many more reasons why he can never be compared to Shyam. What he is doing is completely selfless. Shyam is on the other extreme, completely selfish. One who has no value of human life, relationships and honesty. Arnav, on the other hand, who even though has been betrayed (as per Shyams revelation) still feels Kushi's pain (when she cries at her helplessness, and when Garima slaps her), respects the relationships around him (thats why he remained so quiet when people were questioning him left, right, center and that is why he is so out to protect his sister). Give him a chance, he errs like any human, but he mends fast too😳
Edited by Teesha - 13 years ago
CID
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
65