I have few more questions!! - Page 4

Originally posted by: Akash005

@ Surya_krsnbhakt

Now that my Radha question has been answered , it automatically answers my Vaishno Devi question..

Moreover, questions related to Krishna's and Draupadi's marriages have been answered nicely..

N that's all of my questions.. so thank you so very very much..

Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt

I don't understand. How does this answer Vaishno Devi question?

Vaishno Devi is the combined energy of Lakshmi Sarasvati and Parvati. So, it doesn't dampen Shiva-Vishnu relations in any way. And Parvati-Vishnu relations.. well you have already seen the Jambavati story..😆

Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt

Get ready for one wacky fact:

Lord Shiva incarnated as Radha and 16108 princesses and Kaali Devi as Krishna.

Originally posted by: Akash005

Huh?????????😲😲..

Well its perfectly in tone keeping with what I have been able to understand so far, but still, 😲😲??

Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt

So once Kali and Shva were in Kailasa and remembering how she had jumped on SHiva in her fury and stuck her tongue out.

And Lord Shiva said that he wants to see how Kali feels and Kali said she wants to see how Shiva feels. ANd they decided to take avataras with the opposite gender. Since it was time for the Krishnavatara of the Kalpa, Goddess Parvati incarnated as Krishna, and Lord Shiva as Radha, with his eight Murtis as the eight princesses and also as the other 16100 princesses. Vishnu became Arjuna.. and Kali also became Draupadi. Kali-Vishnu once again. Vishnu was also born as Balarama. This is getting strange...

This is in.. Mahabhagavata Purana (don't ask).

But actually the part about Bhagavati blessing them before agyatvas is there in Mahabharata.

Ah, read the articles..

I read it in Boloji.com and also Devdutt Pattanaik.

Here: http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Articles&ArticleID=1362

And here: http://devdutt.com/articles/from-kali-to-krishna-a-love-song.html

Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt

Oh, and that universal conclusion you arrived at? Change it.😆

All you said is fine that He is She, She is She, She is he, whatever. The last sentence: All the gender n role differences were only created for understanding of mere mortals like us.. Change this sentence. This is like saying actually there is no God called Krishna or Radha, its just to make us understand they have created these names.. t gives a message like that, which can be counted as Nama Aparadha (offence to His name).

Therefore change it to: All the different forms and gender taken by God is all his own leela.

Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt

So I ask all of you to read Lalita Madhava and Vidagdha Madhava which are available here:

Under Rupa Goswami:

http://www.harekrsna.com/philosophy/bmgs/goswamis/writings.htm

Once you read it, for a while, other stories may seem little pheeka. Then if you are lucky, that feeling will continue for the rest of your life. If you are unlucky, (like me), you might need two three readings of it..