{ Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan & Shri Krishna AT#1 } - Page 92

Originally posted by: arun-deeps

hey guys!! where are u all?? missing u tonnes..😭
Have made a Ramji siggie, this is my fav pic of Arun Govil frm Ramayan😳
Made it in a new style...hope u like it..
FEEL FREE TO USE!

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

Wooow Gunu, beautiful sig! I totally love it. Even I really like this pic of Arun Govil. He looks so calm and has such a pleasing smile on his face.😊

Btw, I have been noticing that you've changed your avi once everyday. Do you not feel satisfied with any of them?😆

Originally posted by: Vedo

Heya peeps, how are you all? 🤗 Am trying to be more active here.

After ages I made a siggy from RS Shri Krishna:

😃

Originally posted by: jklp

I'm here dear. Ur creations are marvellous as usual dear.

Originally posted by: arun-deeps

awww...thank you for liking it😳 means a lot to me😳 Ya his smile is something out of dis world, very divine!
Hey u noticed it☺️ actually I was really missing d song enni janmalaina, so I wanted to use all the avis I have of dat song...n thereby feeling satisfied everyday with a new scene of d same😆
Btw, I personally like keep changing avis n siggies...even I see a change in ur siggie box after two days or so😆🤣 Its really cool😎 n I have been inspired to update siggies n avis frm u only di..🤣But seriously I really adore the habit of u changing siggies in siggie dabba...it gives a feel dat ure active here, u're here with me!😳
Btw..
I dunno if many ppl know dis or not, but RS ji was in a favour of keeping dis look of Arun Govil(that I have siggiefied), which looked younger without the strange mask , but later the selection committee decided not to show him young, n it will look more real if they give him a mature look with that mask, after all d members agreed, RSji decided to go with the majority and used d mask over Arun Govil's face to show some age

Yeah, his smile is so peaceful and serene, just like you'd imagine Ramji to be. I wish there were more such HQ pics like these, especially from the swayamvar and wedding sequences. The new mythological shows have so many HQ pics of almost every scene, but HQ pics of the older ones are so rare. I am grateful for the ones we have, but I want more. I'm so greedy!😆

Yeah, you told me once that RSji was in favor of making Arunji look young. He was around 30 then, right? So it was not too old actually, but I don't know why the selection committee wanted to make him look old.😕 How does that look real??? Ramji was only in his teens during the swayamvar and wedding sequences so it's not at all real to make him look older.😲 I guess the audience back in the 80s preferred older looking actors to play God, but age should not be changed for the audience's interest. When Ram is supposed to be young, he should be shown young. They could have used the mask on Arunji during vanvaas episodes since he grew older during the 14 years, but for Bal Kand and Ayodhya Kand I wish they had made Arunji look his age, like in this pic. He looks really sweet and innocent.

Originally posted by: Vedo

Heya peeps, how are you all? 🤗 Am trying to be more active here.

After ages I made a siggy from RS Shri Krishna:

😃

Originally posted by: arun-deeps

hey guys hv updated my agllery too..plzzz visit there also!!
Btw here's one more siggie which I haven't posted here..
for more plzzz visit
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/avatar-and-signatures-shop/1660162/gunus-maakhan-lokopen-siya-ram-vivah-splupd-pg146

Originally posted by: visrom

At times, Ram did seem vulnerable...even though He's Vishnu, He wanted to undergo the sufferings which a normal human would and in such occasions He would seem vulnerable. There was another scene where he was about to destroy the entire world because Sita was kidnapped and Lakshman had to calm him down. I totally agree with you. This is a special aspect about Ramji's incarnation that makes it different from his other incarnations. In every other incarnation he never hid the fact that he was God, but in Ram avatar he lived and suffered like a human. In fact, I prefer seeing Ramji suffer like a human in shows and movies than to see him all-knowing and omniscent, because it makes us relate to his pain and learn how he dealt with it. At the same time, Ramji lived the life of an ideal human so when I see his character being portrayed as an ordinary man in shows and movies, I don't really like it. Most of the time, RS Ramayan portrayed Ram well but there were some moments/dialogues here and there that made me wince.😳 I mean, no show is perfect so I'm not criticizing RSji or anything, but as a devotee I did not like those scenes. I don't remember all of them off the top of my head, but when I remember them I will definitely post them here so that we can all discuss.

I think this is the dialogue you are talking about ...he says 'maine apni patni ko paane ke liye jo yudh kiya, Urmile, usme tere pati ki aahuti de di' and 'Lakshman jaise bhai ko gavaakar yeh yudh jeet bhi liya toh kis kaam ka'. I think this may have been the dialogue, but I'm not 100% sure. Whatever it was, I just did not like the way he made separation of Sita seem like a little thing.

In the first case, he was thinking about what he would tell Urmila after returning back...the irony of the situation...that in order to get his wife, he sacrificed her husband. This part was not harsh at all. I don't think the part about Urmila was bad, but this remark sounded a bit cynical to me, not really what Ramji would say in my opinion.🤔 Showing grief is one thing, which Ramji did do since he behaved as a human, but he never behaved as an ordinary human. He behaved as an ideal human which is why he is called Maryada Purushotham, so to say something like, "I'm sorry Urmila that I sacrificed your husband for my wife" sounds as if he doesn't think much of Sita Ma's troubles in Lanka. It's almost as if he regrets beginning this war at all, which is wrong since Ram fought Ravan not only for Sita, but for the betterment of the world. Although Ram behaved as a human, he knew in his mind that he was God so I do not think he would have made pitiful comments like that. It would have been better had he left Sita out of the remark and blamed himself, which I can see Ramji doing since he was a humble individual. He should have said something like, "Urmila, I am sorry I sacrificed your husband for my sake." Ramji would never have insulted Sita even in thoughts, then how could he have said "for the sake of my wife I sacrificed your husband"? I don't know, I don't mean to argue with anyone but I just don't like this line from that scene.😔

About the second one...he was replying to Sugreev's anger...Sugreev said that in revenge for killing Lakshman he would destroy Lanka. What Ram said here was that there's no point in having 'revenge' and the loss of Lakshman cannot be replaced by having revenge. I have no problem with this line.😊 What Ramji said was very practical. What was the point of revenge when it would not help Lakshman's condition? At the moment, reviving Lakshman was far more important than getting revenge on Lanka.

I don't know where the 'woman' word came in...as far as I remember he never said that...😕 Can you tell me which dialogue you are referring to? The video link if possible. I'm pretty sure it was the first line you posted, where he compared sacrificing Sita with sacrificing Lakshman. I wasn't sure whether he said "woman" or "sita" but the meaning would be the same i think.