conspiracy against prashant in II3 - Page 5

Judges are biased but people not. Conspiracy is made against Prashant but People will shatter such kinds of conspiracies. Yes, biases and prejudices were visible.

Prashant is Far better than Amit. Please vote for Prashant, this will be fair against biased Sony and Judges

Prashant,you deserve and will win.

Originally posted by: musicmantra

😡** the conspiracy against prashant by influencing public and trying to make them beleive that PRASHANT is not as good as Amit was and is seen clearly in tonight final gala**

The very first thing i want to say is that ALISHA is not a kind of person to judge in any kind of competition...a person should not be a judge when he/she can't be fair to the descision...she just speaks for the person she likes...not for the talent. and it was clear when she used to take side of sohit in the begining and it was crystal clear again in tonight's gala when amit forgot his lines and the discuss with Anu mallik.

there is so much conpiracy to make amit paul an india idol and not prashant...

1. when judges gives comment to Amit paul, they r so happy n joyfull and speaks so many good things regarding him, but when its time to comment for Prashant they speak a line or two ( except Anu mallick who sometime do speak for prashant)...and the tone and expression while commenting on Prashant's performance changes so much then in Amit's.

2. when Amit sang his first song in final gala, Anu mallick said," .....dhol bajao, indian idol tu hi banega amit banki sab hatt jaao." How can he say that thing so directly when Prashant was yet to sing...it was all to influence public to vote for amit not to prashant.

3. when Prashant missed a bit in his first song " aashiq banaya aapne"...all 4 judges pointed directly to the mistake by saying he forgot the line...though he only missed a bit but even after then he didn't stop singing...he continued his lines and came back so well in the antara....but when Amit missed the bit he was not even able to catch it up so soon and he missed a whole stanza...

But then that was not that much big mistake for amit according to judges..." har gunah maff"....why should that be...IN MISSING A BIT AND MISSING A WHOLE PARAGRAPH IS A LOT DIFFERENT THING...and how could Javed akhtar say that they both are even now..

those all points were again to influence public to vote for amit not PRASHANT....

4. Most of the time the camera was focused to amit not to PRASHANT. this was again done intentionally so that when public will see amit more than prashant then they will think of him more and vote him more....what a trick huh....

Prashant is always getting more votes than any other constestant and this all thing were said and one just because judges and Sony II3 team wants amit to get the title not the prashant.....

But its PRASHANT who deserves the title....and i hope all the viewers noticed these things. and can see this conpiracy against prashant very cleary...and want to tell them don't get influecne with such things..and KEEP VOTING FOR PRASHANT......

Prashant was so amazing today...and was much better than amit...the song amit sang " hamma..hamma"..listen to the orginal song and u will find the difference...the orginal song is in more high scale than amit sang...he voice not suiting the song so much but still judges gave him so good comments...Javed also said his voice was for this song...crap. listen to orginal u will find the difference....those all comments was also said intentionally to boost up amit's performance....

PRASHANT MUST BE THE INDIAN IDOL 3...vote for him...

________________________ ________________verma.

I agree with you! All da judges "f*** them" espically Alisha! Damnnnnnnnn I hate her so much! 🤢

Originally posted by: Selena Black

'racism' is a concept that's used too lightly nowadays. basically, if a minority does not get when he or she wants, they cry 'racism', without considering that maybe they are actually lacking in that particular skill.

in this case, should prashant not win, people will cry racism. never mind that he is a poor singer compared to his competition. if he doesn't win, obviously 'racism' is to blame.

vote for a SINGER, not for a race.

👏 bravo!!!!
agree with u completly...

Originally posted by: Isha789

go on.. challenge him. he will def accept the challenge! Amit is not a versatile singer whereas prashant can sing any type of songs.

Originally posted by: Selena Black

HAHAHHAHAHA. that made my day.

prashant is the LEAST versatile singer in indian idol. all he can sing are easy two-sur numbers like 'apki duwaan', and if he tries for more complexity, he falls flat on his face. that time he sang 'ek haseena' is proof of this.

oh hello.. !! Prashant is the one who chooses very hard song. You guys are stuck on the same non-versatile song forever.

Definition Of Racism: a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

Here is the deal - people from different states of India think they are better than the people from the other states. Based on skin color, religion, caste, language, history and believe it or not eating habits. That's how India is. Punjabis are considered dumb, Tamilians are derisively called Madrasis, Biharis are considered rural illiterates, Kashmiris don't even want to be part of India, Tamilians hate Kannadigas, Andhrites don't like Telangana, Maharastrians want every non-maharastrian out of their precious Mumbai and so on.

To say racism doesn't exist in India (or for that matter in the entire world) is hogwash!

Originally posted by: ChicksDigMe

Definition Of Racism: a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

Here is the deal - people from different states of India think they are better than the people from the other states. Based on skin color, religion, caste, language, history and believe it or not eating habits. That's how India is. Punjabis are considered dumb, Tamilians are derisively called Madrasis, Biharis are considered rural illiterates, Kashmiris don't even want to be part of India, Tamilians hate Kannadigas, Andhrites don't like Telangana, Maharastrians want every non-maharastrian out of their precious Mumbai and so on.

To say racism doesn't exist in India (or for that matter in the entire world) is hogwash!

Racism exists but that is because certain people in the states still have these ancient stigmas as you mentioned. If you believe everyone is equal, racism won't exist. I don't even understand why it matters, who is from which state. It angers me when certain Prashant fans call Prashant Nepali, they themselves are causing the division. He is an Indian period.

In Saregama there is a Pakistani singer Amanat who sings brilliantly and has got the highest votes many a times. It is mostly the Indian people voting for him. So discrimination is not always at work. If someone is not from your country but has talent, I'd rather support the talented one then cry about patriotism unless it was a cricket match.

huh..?? please stop spreading such baseless rumors!!..

i absolutely agree wid u but how to vote prashant 4m china?

u know wot ... ive been readin abt how ppl r racists n biased ag prashant n not complimenting him coz he is a nepali
u guys r the ones with racism on ur minds...u have a chip on ur shoulder n it just shows up in every post supporting prashant... u r the ones harping on abt makin prashant the II coz he is a nepali n no nepali has cum this far in any show n therefore he has to win (prashant also said it himself)...(check out the msg on II website n read sum of the msg for prashant... reflects the thinkin behind votin 4 prashant)...
dont have selective memory...think back ...if there was indeed a case of bias ag prashant coz he is nepali (n this point 2 has been brought up by prashant fanz...sony has always promoted him as desh ka sepoy) he wudnt b here...till the piano rounds he was one of the contestants supported by the judges (JA wanted to save him over amit when they were in the bottom 4)...but in the galas his perf dipped (prashant himself admitted it) n he cud not maintain the std set by him in the piano rounds... sum of the other contestants improved leaps n bounds...so were praised more than him...
i know 4 one that had prashant been a gud singer i wud have voted 4 him without any thots abt where he cums frm...
n i have never seen ppl who dont support prashant say anything abt his backgrd... they just talk abt his singin n not frm where he is... so dont jump to conclusions n draw inferences which r false... it is an insult to all of us who dont let such petty thots affect r outlook...

The judges are biased against Prashant because they don't want another dud to become the indian idol like what happened last year. 😊

[Prashant belongs to a family of poor financial background, in the age he should be studying and living his life fully he is working in the place of his father, working hard for his family, he is the only one to take care of his family. and going through all these ups and down he is still holding on to himself...and working hard and hard for the title with hope and dream to give a better life to his family...he is the true idol in a sense... ]

mayb then we can make up a new idol category of idol, the best sob story idol. Prashat has an ok voice, his voice is not as deep as Amit's and he has faltered the last few weeks, in fact if it was a fair competition and there was no 'racism or jobism' involved, Emon or Deepali would have been in the top two. Prashant has had the luck to have storng support from the Nepali people as well as the police force people.

And now you guys want to cry wolf and make him out to be a pitiful case, what a laugh