Sa re ga ma pa Singers Vs II3 - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

72

Views

5.3k

Users

45

Frequent Posters

Showbizz thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#11
infact the girls there are so pretty some can become actress's or models
spsharmila thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 18 years ago
#12
If you want to compare the shows on air right now, then I would say that ASVOI has far better singers that both SAREGAMP and II3.
ghetto_princess thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: spsharmila

If you want to compare the shows on air right now, then I would say that ASVOI has far better singers that both SAREGAMP and II3.

well i agree for da girls.. ASVOI's grls r betta dan ii3 n srgmp..! buh styl not superb.. dat wud win..!

behl thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: preethi_p_r

Yesterday for the first time I watched Sa re ga ma pa 2007 as salman khan was called as guest . I was totally spell bound by the singers in that show ! Wat talent !! That is wat talent is !!

I have always watched only II and used to enjoy the show , but now I see the difference , Only emon n Amit maybe good enough as competitors there rest of the singers in II3 are so much below average!!

You are so true. they rock in evevry aspect.those gals like sumedha and poonam and boys like raja aneek amanat mussarat junaid harpreet the list toooooooooooooo strong. thats true true talent.. we can't compare them with anyone or any show

vichanakya thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#15
We can only know who is better if there was a common platform for the singers of all the three competitions with a common set of rules and conditions.

Indian idol contestants can give any singer on the other shows good competition if only they are groomed and trained even a fraction of their counterparts in SRGMP and SVOI.

I have a feeling that SONY tv is harming these talented youngsters by not giving them respite from all those publicity stunts. There is some information that the II contestants are given little time to practice their songs and they are made to toil for other gimmicks. It is told that they are not given even enough time to rest, getting maximum 3 to 4 hrs of sleep, the reason why so many of them are sick and look tired.
*Ajju* thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: spsharmila

If you want to compare the shows on air right now, then I would say that ASVOI has far better singers that both SAREGAMP and II3.


I don't watch ASVOI but SRGM girls are good too ...my fav is Sumedha and poonam but boys are too good in SRGMP
Adorable_Ankita thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#17
i agree wid u.difference is dat srgm singers are basicaly trained even before dey come in de show nd de show polishes deir talent ..dats why deir level is way way higher dan ii contestants..ii singers cant ever b playback singers but in srgm all r ready for de plyback..dey r de true talents but still ii is a good show to watch 😕
A.S.P.I.R.E thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#18
In my opinion all the singers are on the same level .. Since the format is different one automatically feels the other show is better .. I am sure if these guys are given the same traning and everything .. they would perform at the same level ..
SRGMP is such an old show and we all know it's reputation so sometimes one tends to blindly think that it is a better show .. And also because of the panel of judges too .. makes a whole lot of difference .. Takes it to another level ...

Having said that .. I don't think we can compare two shows as the rules of II section .. same goes with SRGMP ... There are two separate sections for some reason .. 😊
val0822 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#19
Talent wise SRGMP singers are way ahead of II. And I am sure we will hear the names of SRGMP singers as mainstream singers.

Having said that, II is fun to watch. Participants are there for fun too. No one has this urge or fire to prove themselves compared to SRGMP participant. Reason for this could be the age. All the participants on II are much younger than the participants of SRGMP.

I enjoy both the shows. SRGMP for talent and II for its rawness.
Showbizz thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#20
SRGMP represents true talent 👏 👏 👏

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".