kudos to u.!
i like when ppl do work that pleases others. when ppl know about music. and aren't afraid to share 'em.
here only 10% ppl really know how to judge. but 100% judge!
so this should be good for all.
it is very difficult to judge with any kind of formatted criteria.
the best performace is always that brings our tears in the eyes or the
song that initiates hyteria in the floor. (though i prefer the first one)
in these situations the points do not add up.
everything is taken by the 'performance' thingy.
differnt circumstance, differnt level of participants, differnt judges, differnt voice textures,
different song quality/difficulty..makes uniform judging impossible.
does any reality show brings out the best contestant as a winner . no..
there are lots of other factors there. the emotional side. the partiality side.
i always had this 'dil' and 'dimag' list.
dil wants some one to win. emotioanl reason.
dimag says the more correct thing. sur and tal thing. performance on the day.
what ends up, some thing else.
we have seen it all in VOI. the tempers and the tantrums.
and good renditions have been thrashed by temperamental judges and Ok song have been praised too much..
inspite of all this, your performance and personality and consistency.. are v good points to judge with.
but does any of these work? no.
i would give following v v simplified criteria (if i had only 4 choices/criteria):
and yes this will also not work....if used by anyone other than me..
1. nearness to the original: 10% (no matter how newness one brings, i feel a touch of the original rendering brings that 'essence' ....)
2. consistency: 20 % (karunya can have 2 off songs, but other 8 songs more than make up that)
3. performance/ease/confidence: 30% it really can change judges judging criteria. differnt stylish input to a song? everyone will like.
4. sur and tal: all should have mastered by now. but still 40%. (judging can vary with the difficulty level of the song)