How can Rishi ????????? - Page 6

Originally posted by: Surbhi123

i am glad u are getting positive vibes🤗...hope something positive happens and everything just become fine...😊

Originally posted by: 100raj

sanjai already said in todays episode--

vidith chal phir raha hai--

but sameer did not know this..

and always seeing indira vidith reacted.

so vidith can stand up on this own on monday.

but he should not defend rishi.that is my humble request.

Originally posted by: Surbhi123

ya exactly...how many struggles for her ???????...even she deserved a happy marriage...buttt cvsss

Originally posted by: Surma

Actually freedom of speech comes with responsiblities. It is not a one way road and not absolute. For example, if you say you deny holucast , you will go to prison in the most free speech loving countries i.e Germany, Switzerland.

The reason why I told her not to write anything because even if she writes something even in good faith, some members will take it different way. They will start bashing each other and make the whole atmosphere of this forum totally unbearable.

If free speech helps only to anatogonize whole environment. what's the point using it ? Beside that, I didn't say you can't write , all I said just wait , gather all the fact and then write.

Originally posted by: Surbhi123

raj - u dont want rishi action toget justified in any way ?????
u want indira to accept rishi with his mistake...???...am i right...????
but don';t u think that will be quiet difficult for here...as the person concerned here is her brother ????

Originally posted by: Surbhi123

awww pariii...🤗
i so agree with u...ratiii diii meansss everythinggg...❤️

Originally posted by: Surbhi123

agar vidit khada hua...to side toh lega hi...i mean that';s obvious...😕
i dont think indira maaf kar payegi bina vidit ke kuch kahe.,...she will be in a shock ...💔...

Originally posted by: nikki1591

the core of free speech is protecting unpopular opinions. the civil war in the us was based on people who were pro and anti slavery. if we had denied people in the us the opportunity to free speech because it antagonizes people, slavery would have existed a lot longer. so no free speech isn't limited because it might create a negative image. much of civil rights came from discourse from popular opinion which created a negative environment. yes. its not absoulte. you can't threaten someone or spread lies about a person's opinion or shout fire in a crowded opinion. but i saw no clear danger or slander here. but i have noticed many times that a post gets shut down bc people don't agree with it. this is usually why i don't post here bc unpopular opinion gets shut down and i feel like it restricts my freedom of speech without a valid reason. in fact, i'll be surprised if my reply isn't taken down