LOST IN CASE 3.1.26
STRUCK IN CASE 4.1.26
7 year leap for Yeh Rishta
Lokah fame Kalyani Priyadarshan cast opp Ranveer in Pralay
Chipka chipki 🙄🙄
Kjo to direct a grand family drama for his next movie
Deepika Padukone’s 40th birthday celebration thread
Happy 300 Manvikians.....
I'm loving Munni-Hrithik encounters and pair
How Many More Indo Pak Movies Will Be Made
Originally posted by: *Rashmi*
I don't know if you'll remember, but JKR said in an interview also that a wizard cannot come back to life is properly dead. What does properly dead mean? Is it just a slip, or is she hinting something? A lot of people that that this was referring to Sirius, and that he's not properly dead, hence he is alive or something... I mean disappearing behind a veil isn't much proof of death...
Anyway. Sirius is dead. Not alive. But Dumbledore? Any comments?
Originally posted by: Draco_Luver
Maybe she was kinda talking about Voldemort and the horcruxes, because Voldemort was stripped from his power and wasnt 'properly' dead therefore he was able to come back.
i feel that he's dead for sure
JKR's words: she had to kill off dumbledore because Harry (like all heroes) has to go the road alone
annnd...i think the Unbreakable Vow is gonna kno if Snape killed dumbledore or not...if dumbledore is still alve...and bye bye snape (he should've died or will die) so to fulfill the the Vow...dumbledore needs to be dead..u can't fool the Vow
those r just my views..and i'm happy with dumbledore's portrait as long as he's there (a reason i think harry WILL go back to Hogwarts..to talk to the portrait)...as much as i want him to be alive...i don't think he will *sigh*
I agree with you Ish.
I also feel that Dumbledore is truly dead as:
1) JKR has never resurrected any character who died - Harry's parents, Sirius, etc. So it is unlikely that she will resurrect Dumbledore except through a Portrait of old headmasters or the Chocolate Frog Cards
2) You are absolutely right about the Unbreakable Vow. If Dumbledore was still alive, Snape would have definitely died as he would not have fulfilled the terms of the contract...
Like the Goblet of Fire, the Unbreakable vow is a powerful magical contract and its not an object which can be confunded.
Originally posted by: *Rashmi*
Omg, you're so right!! I can't believe I didn't think of that before. lol. Thanks for clearing it up!!
Originally posted by: Draco_Luver
haha~your welcome, but I could be wrong~
Originally posted by: *Rashmi*
I feel so embarassed now, to tell you the truth😳 Haha.
Originally posted by: MysticaMagic
I agree with you Ish.
I also feel that Dumbledore is truly dead as:
1) JKR has never resurrected any character who died - Harry's parents, Sirius, etc. So it is unlikely that she will resurrect Dumbledore except through a Portrait of old headmasters or the Chocolate Frog Cards
2) You are absolutely right about the Unbreakable Vow. If Dumbledore was still alive, Snape would have definitely died as he would not have fulfilled the terms of the contract...
Like the Goblet of Fire, the Unbreakable vow is a powerful magical contract and its not an object which can be confunded.
yup...i'm pretty sure he's dead, but that doesn't mean harry can't talk to him...there's always the portrait
yup...i'm pretty sure he's dead, but that doesn't mean harry can't talk to him...there's always the portrait