GHKPM WU & Episode daily discussion thread #116 DT P. 61 - Page 76

Originally posted by: Nirip

Exactly 💯

If a woman is uncomfortable with the touch, she is. Take it. No other reasoning or comparison needed.This logic by quoting the past episodes to mock her is also insensitive.

Haaa....sorry to say this but really few became very insensitive and mocking sai....because she is uncomfortable with their favorite touch.

Originally posted by: msin

If they really wanted to end Pakhi character .. Aishwarya had given notice 1 month ago .. they could have shown patralekha dying after Sai Satya ka marriage in an accident rather than DiG ko rocket .. they could have shown patralekha dying in that rocket scene .. and handing over Vinu to Sai … saying I give back my son to you … now you explain to him how you are his mother .. they did not give it any closure .. so how is Patralekha over in the story

Makers obsession for p character...surrogacy track brought only to make her relevant again in the story..mand she permanently tied to vinu, virat and sai's lives forever

Originally posted by: Micheal_Farzi

https://twitter.com/weekend_firefly/status/1658824709935452160?s=46 aisa wala touch se comfortable humara sai

She never raised her voice against this

Many times , next day she shows same puppy face to virat

Regarding sathya touch, oh come on tell to his face directly tht don't ever touch me and am not comfortable and sathya even after hearing sais uneasiness does it again makes him wrong person. How do another person know without telling?

Did sathya hear sai telling him today. ??

Originally posted by: Thanuj

She said she is uncomfortable with his touch....what is the point of bringing past incidents and mocking sai character to prove satya is innocent. So if suppose a girl faced some kind of physical abuse in the past, so if happens again she should not voice out now..why because she bore it in the past. What kind of logic is this.

Also even if pakhi was worst character we called out samrat when he manhandled pakhi n then tried to close with her when he knows she was behind virat even I also called out when virat manhandled/theatned pakhi after sakhi café meet.

Here Satya just casually put his hand on sai shoulder frdly so definitely he will back off if he heard sai words.

He can also ask sai to not touch him if he's not ok with.

Originally posted by: Bittabuji

Couldn't agree more. Whoever it is whether men or women if they aren't comfortable with their touch it should be respected. Even in past after harini birthday people bashed pakhi n defended virat when she tried to touch him n made him uncomfortable n didn't left him alone unless he drink turmeric milk but when the actor who played virat defended the pakhi character n ok with her actions we never defended virat infact after that he had no problems with pakhi touching him.

Also even if pakhi was worst character we called out samrat when he manhandled pakhi n then tried to close with her when he knows she was behind virat even I also called out when virat manhandled/theatned pakhi after sakhi café meet.

Here Satya just casually put his hand on sai shoulder frdly so definitely he will back off if he heard sai words.

He can also ask sai to not touch him if he's not ok with.

🙂definitely

I thought ppl saw sathya touching sai even after hearing sai words of discomfort.....🤐

Originally posted by: Micheal_Farzi

Sai is so used to get skin turned red wala touch now she is feeling uncomfortable with gentle casual touch of Satya virat please give proper training to Satya and us how to twist the hand and touch it 😎

I have been refraining myself from commenting in the EDT... but had to butt in after reading this!!!

So now just because Sai is rejecting advances from Satya he should force himself like V???? Is that what you want for a female character????

No one justifies V's harmful abusive behaviour that borders on physical violence (not talking about mental harassment since the comparison at this point is between V and Satya and Satya hasn't done anything like that).

So limiting to the physical abuse aspect.... why should Satya fall to V's levels???? if V is so wrong that he gets bashed in every alternate Comment why would anyone want Satya to be like him?

What kind of weird manifestation this is???? Even as a joke????

Didn't knew all this was allowed in the name of humour😳

Also... what happens to consent now????

Sai maybe okay with Satyas touch few days/months/years down the line(like she was with V) ... at this point she is not... at this point she is uncomfortable... at this point she is not ready for that kind of intimacy....

How and why is she wrong?????

Moreover Sai and Satya had clarified the terms... he was witness to V's outburst that led to Sai asking him to marry.... she confessed on the wedding night that she is not happy... he knows why she asked him to marry.

After all this Satya is the one changing the rules or expecting a change in dynamics without even asking for Sais consent.

How is Sai at fault???

He genuinely seems like a good fellow... but it's not the behaviour expected out of him .

Even in arranged marriages in India... men and especially sensible educated men don't do this.... they understand and respect boundaries and consent.

This is so not done!!!!!

Not even as a joke.

When P was called names... it led to huge outrage... how is Satya behaving differently if he is expecting more from the original set of conditions?????

Yes...if Satya is changing rules of pretense marriage without taking Sai into confidence, where is her fault?

How much insensitive is this to make fun of her pain like this???

Originally posted by: Haalim

Your last line. Why do you think he needs a relevance with respect to Sai or Satya? It's his show as well. He's as important as Sai's character.

exactly another truth bomb from the one and only Haalim....

https://tenor.com/9NvP.gif

Originally posted by: Haalim

Aapka alag hi rona hai.

Main Virat the character ki baat kar rahi thi Neil ki nahi.

Mujhe Neil ko yahan defend ya hype karne ki zarurat nahi hai. He's doing it himself on screen.

Bawaaaal hai aaaap, chaagaye ho

https://tenor.com/bAUXK.gif

What a crass story-

Yesterday’s episode Sai told Satya she wants to move on when he asked her to go back to Virat- he got ‘hope’

Just like Virat gave PL after well- many countless incidence- but this is same as post accident.
Just another parallel.

Only difference we are seeing is- Virat was never shown uncomfortable with PL’s touch- here Sai is.
Not sure what to infer from that comparison.

May be they show how Virat was right in trying to stay ‘true’ to his deal marriage? He chose jimmedari while Sai is leaning towards love (she calls everything he does love so lets ho by that)?
Like we saw difference in PL and Sai for 8 months now we see difference in Virat and Sai- How they both deal with norms of ‘deal’ marriage?

Right now- no character is sane- only because they can not show PL was wrong and hence Virat was wring to Sai. To keep integrity of that they will ruin all characters. Satya will go further and will be ruined for Virat to emerge as hero- and since Sai choose Virat again and again- who are we to criticize!

PS: Satya touching Sai is wrong and also Sai touching Virat is wrong as she is married to someone else.

PPS: Both Sai and Satya are wrong— hummmm wonder why does that happen? Think think!

PPPS: Regardless of Satya - I am disappointed in Sai